Intraoperative neural monitoring in thyroid cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neural monitoring (IONM) has increasingly garnered the attention of the surgeons performing thyroid and parathyroid surgery around the world. Current studies suggest a majority of general and head and neck surgeons utilize neural monitoring in their thyroid surgical case load in both the US and Germany. PURPOSE: We aim to present an up-to-date review of the application of IONM specifically focusing on its utility in thyroid cancer surgery. Neural monitoring is discussed particularly as it relates to neural prognosis, the issues of staged thyroid surgery for thyroid cancer, and new horizons in the monitoring of the superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) and prevention of neural injury through continuous vagal neural monitoring. CONCLUSION: IONM, as it relates to thyroid surgery, has obtained a widespread acceptance as an adjunct to the gold standard of visual nerve identification. The value of IONM in prognosticating neural function and in intraoperative decision making regarding proceeding to bilateral surgery is also well-known. Initial data on recent extensions of IONM in the form of SLN monitoring and continuous vagal nerve monitoring are promising. Continuous vagal nerve monitoring expands the utility of IONM by providing real-time electrophysiological information, allowing surgeons to take a corrective action in impending neural injury.

Quantity and three-dimensional position of the recurrent and superior laryngeal nerve lower motor neurons in a rat model.

OBJECTIVES: We sought to elucidate the 3-dimensional position and quantify the lower motor neurons (LMNs) of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) and the superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) in a rat model. Quantification and mapping of these neurons will enhance the usefulness of the rat model in the study of reinnervation following trauma to these nerves. METHODS: Female Sprague-Dawley rats underwent microsurgical transection of the RLN, the SLN, or both the RLN and SLN or sham surgery. After transection, either Fluoro-Ruby (FR) or Fluoro-Gold (FG) was applied to the proximal nerve stumps. The brain stems were harvested, sectioned, and examined for fluorolabeling. The LMNs were quantified, and their 3-dimensional position within the nucleus ambiguus was mapped. RESULTS: Labeling of the RLN was consistent regardless of the labeling agent used. A mean of 243 LMNs was documented for the RLN. The SLN labeling with FR was consistent and showed a mean of 117 LMNs; however, FG proved to be highly variable in labeling the SLN. The SLN LMNs lie rostral and ventral to those of the RLN. In the sham surgical condition, FG was noted to contaminate adjacent tissues--in particular, in the region of the SLN. CONCLUSIONS: Fluorolabeling is an effective tool to locate and quantify the LMNs of the RLN and SLN. The LMN positions and counts were consistent when FR was used in labeling of either the RLN or the SLN. Fluoro-Gold, however, because of its tendency to contaminate surrounding structures, can only be used to label the RLN. Also, as previously reported, the SLN LMNs lie rostral and ventral to those of the RLN. This information results in further clarification of a rat model of RLN injury that may be used to investigate the effects of neurotrophic factors on RLN reinnervation.