Challenges in the Head and Neck Department in the Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Patients Presenting to a Single Tertiary Hospital of Somalia With Extreme War Injuries.

In this study, the authors aimed to share their experience with 46 patients who were wounded due to terrorism and war in Somalia. The authors also evaluated the etiological diversity of terror-related and war-related injuries. The study included 46 patients treated at the 150-bed Turkey-Somalia Tertiary Hospital between 2019 and 2021. The authors reviewed medical records including data regarding age, sex, trauma etiology, and type of fracture and trauma. For all patients, surgical technique and plate and screw applications were recorded. The authors also assessed complications and outcomes for the patients. The study included 5 women (10.9%) and 41 men (89.1%). The mean age was 30.36 years. It was found that 2 patients (4.35%) presented to the emergency department with stab injuries, 33 patients with blast injuries from improvised explosive devices (71.73%), and 11 patients with firearm injuries. There were 31 patients with maxillary and mandibular fractures, 17 of which had both maxillary and mandibular fractures. There were 14 patients with maxillary fracture alone, including 3 patients with tripod fracture and 7 patients with inferior and lateral rim fracture. There was a mandibular fracture in 17 patients, including 5 patients with parasymphysis fracture, 7 patients with ramus fracture, and 5 patients with multifocal comminuted fracture. It is a challenging process to treat terror-related injuries in our tertiary hospital in Somalia, where all resources are imported from foreign countries. In such settings, authorities should make protective equipment obligatory to prevent civil and military casualties. Trauma hospitals and experienced trauma surgeons should be available.

Lower Extremity Sandblast Injury: A Rarely Seen Injury Mechanism in the Civilian Population.

Blast injuries are both complex and rare in the civilian population. This combination can often lead to missed opportunities for early, effective intervention. This is a case report of a 31-year-old male who suffered a lower extremity blast injury while using an industrial sandblaster. This blast injury presented as a closed degloving, or Morel-Lavallee lesion, which can easily be mistreated and lead to infection and further disability. Following assessment, identification, and confirmation of the Morel-Lavallee lesion via radiographic imaging, this patient underwent debridement surgery, wound vac therapy, and antibiotic treatment before being discharged home with no major physiologic or neurologic deficits. The purpose of this report is to highlight the importance of assessing for closed degloving injuries when presented with blast injury traumas in the civilian trauma setting, and outlines the process utilized for assessment and treatment.

Self-reported respiratory outcomes associated with blast exposure in post 9/11 veterans.

BACKGROUND: Blast lung overpressure has received interest as a cause of chronic respiratory disease in Service members who deployed in support of U.S. military operations in Southwest Asia and Afghanistan since 2001. We studied whether veterans who experienced blast exposure report more chronic respiratory symptoms and diagnoses compared to deployed veterans who did not. METHODS: 9,000 veterans included in the Department of Veterans Affairs Toxic Embedded Fragment Registry were invited to complete a survey assessing chronic respiratory symptoms, diagnoses, and exposures. Blast exposure was assessed using the Brief Traumatic Brain Injury Screen and by presence of other symptoms such as blast-induced loss of consciousness. RESULTS: Participants (n = 2147) were predominantly <40 years old, served in the Army, and injured on average 12.8 years previously. 91% reported blast exposure. Blast-exposed veterans were significantly more likely to report cough (OR 1.8), wheeze (OR 2.4), and dyspnea (OR 1.8), even after adjustment for covariates including smoking and occupational exposures to dust, fume, and gas. Veterans reporting higher severity of blast impact, such as traumatic brain injury or loss of consciousness, were more likely to report cough, wheeze, or dyspnea. Veterans with higher severity of blast impact by multiple measures were also more likely to report having COPD. Those reporting a physician-diagnosis of traumatic brain injury were significantly more likely to report having both asthma (OR 1.5) and COPD (OR 1.5). CONCLUSIONS: Blast exposure is associated with respiratory symptoms and COPD. Respiratory system evaluation may warrant inclusion as a standard part of barotrauma health assessment.

Plasma biomarkers associated with deployment trauma and its consequences in post-9/11 era veterans: initial findings from the TRACTS longitudinal cohort.

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is among the most common injuries sustained by post-9/11 veterans; however, these injuries often occur within the context of psychological trauma. Blast exposure, even in the absence of a diagnosable TBI, leads to changes in neural connectivity and congitive functioning. Therefore, considering clinical comorbidities and injury characteristics is critical to understanding the long-term effects of mTBI. Research is moving towards identifying diagnostic and prognostic blood-based biomarkers for TBI; however, few studies include other prevalent clinical and medical comorbidities related to deployment. Here, we present the initial cross-sectional relationships between plasma biomarkers, clinical, and medical comorbidities in a well-characterized longitudinal sample of 550 post-9/11 veteran men and women. We examined biomarkers associated with inflammation (interleukin 6 and 10, tumor necrosis factor α, and eotaxin) and neurodegeneration (neurofilament light, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), tau, brain derived neurotrophic factor, amyloid ß 40 and 42, phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain, and neuron specific enolase). Univariate analyses of covariance (ANCOVA) were conducted to determine mean level differences between close blast (blasts that occur within 0-10 meters) and mTBI groups. Our primary findings were twofold: (1) Inflammatory markers were consistently higher in participants exposed to close blasts and were strongly related to deployment-related psychopathology. (2) GFAP was consistently lower in participants exposed to blast and mTBI and lower GFAP was associated with more severe psychological symptoms. More research is clearly needed; however, our findings indicate that chronic increased inflammation and decreased GFAP may be related to close blast exposure.

[Atypical blast injury of the left hand : Multiple trauma with severe injury especially of the left hand]. / Atypische Explosionsverletzung der linken Hand : Polytrauma mit schwerer Verletzung insbesondere der linken Hand.

There is an accumulation of blast injuries on New Year's Eve due to fireworks.During an attempt to manufacture a firework the substances being mixed in a mortar exploded. The left hand of the patient was severely injured.During the operative treatment with radical débridement and generous amputation without osteosynthesis, a basic hand function according to Entin could initially be preserved; however, at a later stage the fourth finger could not be preserved, so that a prosthesis became necessary.This case report shows the importance of expertise in hand surgery in the treatment of such severe injuries. A toe-to-hand transplantation represents an additional treatment option.

Epidemiology, patterns of care and outcomes of traumatic brain injury in deployed military settings: Implications for future military operations.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is prevalent and highly morbid among Service Members. A better understanding of TBI epidemiology, outcomes, and care patterns in deployed settings could inform potential approaches to improve TBI diagnosis and management. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis of Service Members who sustained a TBI in deployed settings between 2001 and 2018 was conducted. Among individuals hospitalized with TBI, we compared the demographic characteristics, mechanism of injury, injury type, and severity between combat and noncombat injuries. We compared diagnostic tests and procedures, evacuation patterns, return to duty rates and days in care between individuals with concussion and those with severe TBI. RESULTS: There were 46,309 service members with TBI and 9,412 who were hospitalized; of those hospitalized, 55% (4,343) had isolated concussion and 9% (796) had severe TBI, of whom 17% (132/796) had multiple injuries. Overall mortality was 2% and ranged from 0.1% for isolated concussion to 18% for severe TBI. The vast majority of TBI were evacuated by rotary wing to role 3 or higher, including those with isolated concussion. As compared with severe TBI, individuals with isolated concussion had fewer diagnostic or surgical procedures performed. Only 6% of service members with severe TBI were able to return to duty as compared with 54% of those with isolated concussion. Traumatic brain injury resulted in 123,677 lost duty days; individuals with isolated concussion spent a median of 2 days in care and those with severe TBI spent a median of 17 days in care and a median of 6 days in the intensive care unit. CONCLUSION: While most TBI in the deployed setting are mild, TBI is frequently associated with hospitalization and multiple injuries. Overtriage of mild TBI is common. Improved TBI capabilities applicable to forward settings will be critical to the success of future multidomain operations with limitations in air superiority. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiologic; Level III.

[Surgical treatment of a patient with mine blast abdominal injury complicated by damage to the duodenum]. / Khirurgicheskoe lechenie patsienta s sochetannymi povrezhdeniyami pri minno-vzryvnoi travme.

The authors describe successful treatment of a patient with consequences of a mine-explosive wound of the right thigh and abdomen, including damage to the duodenum. Staged surgical treatment made it possible to identify and eliminate defects in primary surgical treatment in time. Thus, favorable treatment results were obtained.

Electronic Cigarette-Related Injuries Presenting to Five Large Burn Centers, 2015-2019.

Electronic cigarettes are advertised as safer alternatives to traditional cigarettes yet cause serious injury. U.S. burn centers have witnessed a rise in both inpatient and outpatient visits to treat thermal injuries related to their use. A multicenter retrospective chart review of American Burn Association burn registry data from five large burn centers was performed from January 2015 to July 2019 to identify patients with electronic cigarette-related injuries. A total of 127 patients were identified. Most sustained less than 10% total body surface area burns (mean 3.8%). Sixty-six percent sustained second-degree burns. Most patients (78%) were injured while using their device. Eighteen percent of patients reported spontaneous device combustion. Two patients were injured while changing their device battery, and two were injured modifying their device. Three percent were injured by secondhand mechanism. Burn injury was the most common injury pattern (100%), followed by blast injury (3.93%). Flame burns were the most common (70%) type of thermal injury; however, most patients sustained a combination-type injury secondary to multiple burn mechanisms. The most injured body region was the extremities. Silver sulfadiazine was the most common agent used in the initial management of thermal injuries. Sixty-three percent of patients did not require surgery. Of the 36% requiring surgery, 43.4% required skin grafting. Multiple surgeries were uncommon. Our data recognize electronic cigarette use as a public health problem with the potential to cause thermal injury and secondary trauma. Most patients are treated on an inpatient basis although most patients treated on an outpatient basis have good outcomes.

Point-of-care ultrasound for treatment and triage in austere military environments.

BACKGROUND: Assessment and triage in an austere environment represent a major challenge in casualty care. Modern conflicts involve a significant proportion of multiple wounds, either superficial or penetrating, which complicate clinical evaluation. Furthermore, there is often poor accessibility to computed tomography scans and a limited number of surgical teams. Therefore, ultrasound (US) represents a potentially valuable tool for distinguishing superficial fragments or shrapnels from penetrating trauma requiring immediate damage-control surgery. METHODS: This retrospective observational multicenter study assessed casualties treated for 8 months by five medical teams deployed in Africa and Middle East. Two experts, who were experienced in military emergency medicine but did not take part in the missions, carried out an independent analysis for each case, evaluating the contribution of US to the following five items: triage categorization, diagnosis, clinical severity, prehospital therapeutic choices, and priority to operation room. Consensus was obtained using the Delphi method with three rounds. RESULTS: Of 325 casualties, 189 underwent US examination. The mean injury severity scale score was 25.6, and 76% were wounded by an improvised explosive device. Ultrasound was useful for confirming (23%) or excluding (63%) the suspected diagnosis made in the clinical assessment. It also helped obtain a diagnosis that had not been considered for 3% of casualties and was responsible for a major change in procedure or therapy in 4%. Ultrasound altered the surgical priority in 43% of cases. For 30% of cases, US permitted surgery to be temporarily delayed to prioritize another more urgent casualty. CONCLUSION: Ultrasound is a valuable tool for the management of mass casualties by improving treatment and triage, especially when surgical resources are limited. In some situations, US can also correct a diagnosis or improve prehospital therapeutic choices. Field medical teams should be trained to integrate US into their prehospital protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series (no criterion standard), level V.

Hindfoot blast injuries caused by improvised explosive devices: long-term functional assessment in French military personnel.

PURPOSE: The chosen treatment and long-term evaluation of hindfoot blast injuries are not well-represented in the literature. The first objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate functional outcomes in French service personnel who had sustained such injuries caused by improvised explosive devices. The second objective was to compare the results for patients who had amputations with those who did not. The hypothesis was that amputee recovered better function. METHODS: Long-term functional evaluations were carried out using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scale (AOFAS), the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), and the Short Form 12 health survey (SF-12). RESULTS: Eight servicemen with ten hindfoot blast injuries were reviewed at a mean follow-up time of seven years. Primary management was always conservative although half of the patients required late amputation for chronic pain. The patients who underwent amputation reported significantly lower levels of pain than those who did not have an amputation, with higher FAAM and SF-12 scores. CONCLUSION: In this series, long-term functional results appear better in the amputated group.

Characteristics and treatments of ocular blast injury in Tianjin explosion in China.

BACKGROUND: To document characteristics and treatments of ocular blast injury from a fire and explosion. METHOD: Authors retrospectively evaluated 116 patients with 166 eye injuries from six hospitals. Terminology of ocular injury referred to Birmingham Eye Trauma Terminology, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was categorized with the ocular trauma score (OTS) grading system. Incidence, preoperational and follow-up BCVA, treatment of severe ocular blast injuries were surveyed. RESULTS: Oculoplastic injuries accounted for the majority of eye injuries, while globe injuries were presented in 52 eyes with median baseline OTS 70 ranging from 26 to 100. No endophthalmitis occurred. The mean timing of the first-stage operations was 9.4 ± 6.4 h after blast, while second-stage operations were performed on average 14.7 ± 0.9 days post blast. Final BCVA of 68.8% of eyes achieved 20/200 or better as followed, 7 open globe injuries had a BCVA of no light perception. Additionally, eyes presenting rupture, retinal detachment, vitreous hemorrhage, choroidal injury and initial BCVA less than 20/200 had worse final visual outcomes, while globe penetration was not associated with poor visual acuity. CONCLUSION: Various ocular injuries were commonly in the casualties of blast, in which open-globe injuries have worst visual prognosis. OTS is a valid approach for evaluation of prognosis and optimizing the therapeutic strategies subsequently in the massive casualty. Intense rescue and careful examination, proper surgery should be performed correctly to rescue patients.

Pelvic injury patterns in blast: Morbidity and mortality.

BACKGROUND: Pelvic trauma has emerged as one of the most severe injuries to be sustained by the victim of a blast insult. The incidence and mortality due to blast-related pelvic trauma is not known, and no data exist to assess the relative risk of clinical or radiological indicators of mortality. METHODS: The UK Joint Theater Trauma Registry was interrogated to identify those sustaining blast-mediated pelvic fractures during the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, from 2003 to 2014, with subsequent computed tomography image analysis. Casualties that sustained more severe injuries remote to the pelvis were excluded. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-nine casualties with a 36% overall mortality rate were identified. Pelvic vascular injury, unstable pelvic fracture patterns, traumatic amputation, and perineal injury were higher in the dismounted fatality group (p < 0.05). All fatalities sustained a pelvic vascular injury. Pelvic vascular injury had the highest relative risk of death for any individual injury and an associated mortality of 56%. Dismounted casualties that sustained unstable pelvic fracture patterns, traumatic amputation, and perineal injury were at three times greater risk (relative risk, 3.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.27-7.09) to have sustained a pelvic vascular injury than those that did not sustain these associated injuries. Opening of the pubic symphysis and at least one sacroiliac joint was significantly associated with pelvic vascular injury (p < 0.001), and the lateral displacement of the sacroiliac joints was identified as a fair predictor of pelvic vascular injury (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.73). CONCLUSION: Dismounted blast casualties with pelvic fracture are at significant risk of a noncompressible pelvic vascular injury. Initial management of these patients should focus upon controlling noncompressible pelvic bleeding. Clinical and radiological predictors of vascular injury and mortality suggest that mitigation strategies aiming to attenuate lateral displacement of the pelvis following blast are likely to result in fewer fatalities and a reduced injury burden. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic, level III.

Nonfatal motor vehicle related injuries among deployed US Service members: Characteristics, trends, and risks for limb amputations.

BACKGROUND: Motor vehicle-related (MVR) incidents are important causes of morbidity among deployed US service members (SMs). Nonbattle MVR injuries are usually similar to civilian MVR injuries, while battle MVR injuries are often unique due to the blast effects from precipitating explosive mechanisms. Our primary objective was to describe the characteristics and trends of nonfatal MVR injuries sustained by deployed US SMs. A second objective was to assess the association between mechanism of injury (i.e., explosive vs. nonexplosive) and limb amputation. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis using data from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry collected from October 2001 to December 2018. Descriptive statistics were reported stratified by mechanism of injury (explosive vs. nonexplosive). The association between mechanism of injury and limb amputation was assessed using logistic regression models. RESULTS: There were 3,119 US casualties who sustained nonfatal MVR injuries, 2,380 (76.3%) SMs sustained nonexplosive MVR injuries while 739 (23.7%) sustained explosive MVR injuries. Of all MVR casualties, 2,085 (66.9%) were in Iraq or Syria and 1034 (33.1%) in Afghanistan. The annual prevalence of nonfatal MVR battle casualties was highest in Iraq and Syria from 2003 to 2009 and Afghanistan from 2009 to 2014, ranging overall 15 to 50 MVR casualties per 1,000 wounded in action. There were 92 limb amputations associated with MVR incidents. Compared with nonexplosive MVR mechanisms, explosive MVR mechanisms had higher association with limb amputation (adjusted odds ratio, 2.6; confidence interval, 1.7-3.9), even after adjusting for injury year and Injury Severity Score (AOR, 2.1; confidence interval: 1.4-3.4). CONCLUSION: Motor vehicle-related incidents are an important cause of injury in US military operations. Compared with nonexplosive MVR incidents, explosive MVR incidents result in more severe injuries, and have a higher associated risk of limb amputation. Continued efforts to improve injury prevention through protective equipment and medical training specific to MVR injuries are needed. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and epidemiological study, Level III.

Diagnosis and treatment of traumatic vascular injury of limbs in military and emergency medicine: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic vascular injury is caused by explosions and projectiles (bullets and shrapnel); it may affect the arteries and veins of the limbs, and is common in wartime, triggering bleeding, and ischemia. The increasing use of high-energy weapons in modern warfare is associated with severe vascular injuries. METHODS: To summarize the current evidence of diagnosis and treatment for traumatic vascular injury of limbs, for saving limbs and lives, and put forward some new insights, we comprehensively consulted literatures and analyzed progress in injury diagnosis and wound treatment, summarized the advanced treatments now available, especially in wartime, and explored the principal factors in play in an effort to optimize clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Extremity vascular trauma poses several difficult dilemmas in diagnosis and treatment. The increasing use of high-energy weapons in modern warfare is associated with severe vascular injuries. Any delay in treatment may lead to loss of limbs or death. The development of diagnose and treat vascular injury of extremities are the clinical significance to the tip of military medicine, such as the use of fast, cheap, low invasive diagnostic methods, repairing severe vascular injury as soon as possible, using related technologies actively (fasciotomy, etc). CONCLUSION: We point out the frontier of the diagnosis and treatment of traumatic vascular injury, also with a new model of wartime injury treatment in American (forward surgical teams and combat support hospitals), French military surgeons regarding management of war-related vascular wounds and Chinese military ("3 districts and 7 grades" model). Many issues remain to be resolved by further experience and investigation.

Lung injury risk assessment during blast exposure.

Blast pulmonary trauma are common consequences of modern war and terrorism action. To better protect soldiers from that threat, the injury risk level when protected and unprotected must be assessed. Knowing from the literature that a possible amplification of the blast threat would be provided by some thoracic protective systems, the objective is to propose an original approach to correlate a measurable parameter on a manikin with a pulmonary risk level. Using a manikin whose response is correlated with the proposed tolerance limits should help in the evaluation of thoracic protective system regarding injury outcomes. A database including lung injury data from large mammals have been created, allowing the definition of iso-impulse tolerance limits from no lung injury to severe ones (∼60% of ecchymosis). As the use of this metric is not sufficient to evaluate the performance of protective systems on a manikin, the iso-impulse tolerance limits were associated with the thoracic response of post-mortem swine under blast loading. It was found that the lung injury threshold in terms of incident impulse is 58.3 kPa·ms, corresponding to a chest wall peak of acceleration/velocity/displacement of 7350 m/s2, 3.7 m/s and 6.4 mm respectively. Lung injuries are considered as severe (30-60% of ecchymosis) when the incident impulse exceed 232.8 kPa·ms, leading to a chest wall peak of acceleration/velocity/displacement of 79.7 km/s2, 14.7 m/s and 30.1 mm respectively. The defined lung tolerance limits are valid for a 50 kg swine (unprotected) exposed side-on to the blast threat and against a wall.

Management and outcome of 597 wartime penetrating lower extremity arterial injuries from an international military cohort.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular injury is a leading cause of death and disability in military and civilian settings. Most wartime and an increasing amount of civilian vascular trauma arises from penetrating mechanisms of injury due to gunshot or explosion. The objective of this study was to provide a comprehensive examination of penetrating lower extremity arterial injury and to characterize long-term limb salvage and differences related to mechanisms of injury. METHODS: The military trauma registries of the United States and the United Kingdom were analyzed to identify service members who sustained penetrating lower limb arterial injury (2001-2014). Treatment and limb salvage data were studied and comparisons made of patients whose penetrating vascular trauma arose from explosion (group 1) vs gunshot (group 2). Standardized statistical testing was used, with Bonferroni corrections for multiple comparisons. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 568 combat casualties (mean age, 25.2 years) with 597 injuries (explosion, n = 416; gunshot, n = 181). Group 1 had higher Injury Severity Score (P < .05) and Mangled Extremity Severity Score (P < .0001), required more blood transfusion (P < .05), and had more tibial (P < .01) and popliteal (P < .05) arterial injuries; group 2 had more profunda femoris injuries (P < .05). Initial surgical management for the whole cohort included vein interposition graft (33%), ligation (31%), primary repair with or without patch angioplasty (16%), temporary vascular shunting (15%), and primary amputation (6%). No difference in patency of arterial reconstruction was found between group 1 and group 2, although group 1 had a higher incidence of primary (13% vs 2%; P < .05) and secondary (19% vs 9%; P < .05) amputation. Similarly, longer term freedom from amputation was lower for group 1 than for group 2 (68% vs 89% at 5.5 years; Cox hazard ratio, 0.30; P < .0001), as was physical functioning (36-Item Short Form Health Survey data; mean, 39.80 vs 43.20; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of wartime lower extremity arterial injuries result from an explosive mechanism that preferentially affects the tibial vasculature and results in poorer long-term limb salvage compared with those injured with firearms. The mortality associated with immediate limb salvage attempts is low, and delayed amputations occur weeks later, affording the patient involvement in the decision-making and rehabilitation planning. We recommend assertive attempts at vascular repair and limb salvage for service members injured by explosive and gunshot mechanisms.

Intrawound Antibiotic Powder Decreases Frequency of Deep Infection and Severity of Heterotopic Ossification in Combat Lower Extremity Amputations.

BACKGROUND: Amputations sustained owing to combat-related blast injuries are at high risk for deep infection and development of heterotopic ossification, which can necessitate reoperation and place immense strain on the patient. Surgeons at our institution began use of intrawound antibiotic powder at the time of closure in an effort to decrease the rate of these surgical complications after initial and revision amputations, supported by compelling clinical evidence and animal models of blast injuries. Antibiotic powder may be useful in reducing the risk of these infections, but human studies on this topic thus far have been inconclusive. PURPOSE: We sought to determine whether administration of intrawound antibiotic powder at the time of closure would (1) decrease the risk of subsequent deep infections of major lower-extremity combat-related amputations, and (2) limit formation and decrease severity of heterotopic ossification common in the combat-related traumatic residual limb. METHODS: Between 2009 and 2015, 252 major lower extremity initial and revision amputations were performed by a single surgeon. Revision cases were excluded if performed specifically to address deep infection, leaving 223 amputations (88.5%) for this retrospective analysis. We reviewed medical records to collect patient information, returns to the operating room for subsequent infection, and microbiologic culture results. We also reviewed radiographs taken at least 3 months after surgery to determine the presence and severity of heterotopic ossification using the Walter Reed classification system. We grouped cases according to whether limbs underwent initial or revision amputations, and whether the limbs had a history of a prior infection. Apart from the use of antibiotic powder and duration of followup, the groups did not differ in terms of age, mechanism of injury, or sex. We then calculated the absolute risk reduction for infection and heterotopic ossification and the number needed to treat to prevent an infection. RESULTS: Overall, administration of antibiotic powder resulted in a 13% absolute risk reduction of deep infection (14 of 82 [17%] versus 42 of 141 [30%]; p = 0.03; 95% CI, 0.20%-24.72%). In revision amputation surgery, the absolute risk reduction of infection with antibiotic powder use was 16% overall (eight of 58 versus 17 of 57; 95% CI, 1.21%-30.86%), and 25% for previously infected limbs (eight of 46 versus 14 of 33; 95% CI, 4.93%-45.14%). The number needed to treat to prevent one additional deep infection in amputation surgery is eight in initial amputations, seven in revision amputations, and four for revision amputation surgery on previously infected limbs. With the numbers available, we observed no reduction in the risk of heterotopic ossification with antibiotic powder use, but severity was decreased in the treatment group in terms of the number of residual limbs with moderate or severe heterotopic ossification (three of 12 versus 19 of 34; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that administration of intrawound antibiotic powder reduces deep infection in residual limbs of combat amputees, particularly in the setting of revision amputation surgery in apparently aseptic residual limbs at the time of the surgery. Furthermore, administration of antibiotic powder for amputations at time of initial closure decreases the severity of heterotopic ossification formation, providing a low-cost adjunct to decrease the risk of two complications common to amputation surgery.Level of Evidence Level III, therapeutic study.

Calculated Decisions: Blast Lung Injury Severity Score

The Blast Lung Injury Severity Score stratifies primary blast lung injuries into 3 categories to guide ventilator treatment.