Sequencing projects will screen 200,000 newborns for disease.

U.K. and New York City efforts face cost and ethical issues.

Ethical Issues in Newborn Sequencing Research: The Case Study of BabySeq.

The BabySeq Project is a study funded by the National Institutes of Health and aimed at exploring the medical, behavioral, and economic impacts of integrating genomic sequencing into the care of both healthy newborns and newborns who are sick. Infants were randomly assigned to receive standard of care or standard of care plus sequencing. The protocol and consent specified that only childhood-onset conditions would be returned. When 1 child was found to carry a BRCA2 mutation despite a negative family history, the research team experienced moral distress about nondisclosure and sought institutional review board permission to disclose. The protocol was then modified to require participants to agree to receive results for adult-onset-only conditions as a precondition to study enrollment. The BabySeq team asserted that their new protocol was in the child's best interest because having one's parents alive and well provides both an individual child benefit and a "family benefit." We begin with a short description of BabySeq and the controversy regarding predictive genetic testing of children for adult-onset conditions. We then examine the ethical problems with (1) the revised BabySeq protocol and (2) the concept of family benefit as a justification for the return of adult-onset-only conditions. We reject family benefit as a moral reason to expand genomic sequencing of children beyond conditions that present in childhood. We also argue that researchers should design their pediatric studies to avoid, when possible, identifying adult-onset-only genetic variants and that parents should not be offered the return of this information if discovered unless relevant for the child's current or imminent health.

Ethical issues with testing and treatment for Krabbe disease.

Early-infantile Krabbe disease (EIKD) is an autosomal recessive, progressive, neurodegenerative disorder that usually leads to death in infancy. A study published in 2005 indicated that hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) was effective in the treatment for EIKD when used before the onset of symptoms. This finding suggested that newborn screening for EIKD, which would allow earlier diagnosis, might lead to earlier treatment and better outcomes. In 2006, New York was the first state to implement newborn screening for Krabbe disease; however, the results were not as good as proponents had hoped. In this paper, we present the history of efforts to diagnose and treat EIKD. Based on our findings, we question the efficacy of newborn screening for Krabbe disease. We present two arguments. First, testing itself is too imprecise. Even with the most rigorous testing standards, such as those used in New York, many of the children who are identified as being 'at risk' for EIKD remain asymptomatic. It is unclear if they will remain asymptomatic forever and, thus, whether the tests should be considered 'false positives', or whether they will eventually develop the disease. Second, we question the efficacy of early HSCT. We recommend placing a moratorium on mandatory newborn screening for EIKD. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Current tests to identify which children are likely to develop Krabbe diseased are inadequate. Many children identified as being 'at risk' for early infantile Krabbe disease remain asymptomatic. Psychosine appears to be more specific than low galactosylceramidase levels for diagnosing early infantile Krabbe disease.

Bioética y políticas públicas de tamización neonatal en los Estados Unidos, el Reino Unido y Colombia / Bioethics and public policies in neonatal screening in the United States, United Kingdom, and Colombia

Resumen Introducción. La reflexiónsobre cómo deber ser la tamización neonatal requiere revelar la relevancia de los factores bioéticos involucrados. Objetivo. Comprender la relación de las consideraciones bioéticas con la forma en que se efectúa la tamización neonatal e indicar la relevancia de esta actividad en las normas colombianas. Materiales y métodos. Se hizo un estudio comparado de las políticas públicas en Estados Unidos y el Reino Unido, las cuales representan casos extremos de la tamización neonatal. Con base en las similitudes y las diferencias, se interpretó la influencia de los principios bioéticos. Con esta información, se indicaron en la normatividad colombiana sobre tamización neonatal las consideraciones bioéticas pertinentes. Resultados. En el Reino Unido prevalece la autonomía de los padres, lo que ocasiona riesgos al no cumplirse con las acciones obligatorias de beneficencia. En los Estados Unidos prevalece la beneficencia, con un amplio y obligatorio cubrimiento de anomalías sujetas a tamización, lo cual incrementa la probabilidad de falsos positivos y ocasiona un alto costo de oportunidad. Hay similitudes entre los procedimientos de los dos países que también están parcialmente contemplados en Colombia, como la pretensión de equidad en el acceso. Otras, como el asesoramiento profesional especializado o la posibilidad de rechazar la tamización, no se tienen en cuenta en la normatividad colombiana sobre tamización neonatal. Además, hay diferentes enfoques de justicia frente a la inclusión de las anomalías en la tamización y falta de armonía entre las normas, lo que impide una detección eficaz. Conclusión. Las consideraciones bioéticas no solo explican las diferencias entre países, sino que algunas veces prevalecen en la concepción de las políticas públicas de tamización neonatal. En Colombia, se propone su inclusión en las normas de mayor jerarquía para hacerlas más efectivas.

Abstract Introduction: Thinking about how neonatal screening should be done requires explaining the relevance of the bioethical factors involved. Objective: To understand the relationship between bioethical considerations and the way neonatal screening is done and to identify its relevance in the Colombian legislation. Materials and methods: A comparative study of public policies in the United States and the United Kingdom was done, as they exemplify extreme cases of neonatal screening. The influence of bioethical principles was interpreted based on similarities and differences. With this information, locally affected bioethical considerations were identified in the Colombian legislation on neonatal screening. Results: In the United Kingdom, paternal autonomy prevails allowing parents to deny obligatory beneficence. In the USA, beneficence prevails and a significant number of anomalies must be screened for. This increases the likelihood of false positives and causes a high opportunity cost. Both countries have similarities which are also partially accepted in Colombia, suchas the demand for equity of access. Others, suchas specialized professional advice or the right to refuse screening, are not considered in the Colombian legislation on neonatal screening. Additionally, there are circumstances in Colombia such as different perspectives on what respecting justice means and how to apply that in choosing which abnormalities are screened for and lack of harmony between norms that prevents efficacious detection. Conclusion: Bioethical considerations explain the differences between countries and sometimes prevail in the development of public policies on neonatal screening. Their inclusion in high-level norms in Colombia for effective screening is proposed.

Single-Gene Sequencing in Newborn Screening: Success, Challenge, Hope.

Some state-based newborn screening programs in the United States already use sequencing technology, as a secondary screening test for individual conditions rather than as a broad screening tool. Newborn screening programs sequence an individual gene, such as the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator, which causes cystic fibrosis, after an initial biochemical test suggests that a baby might have a condition related to that gene. The experiences of state public health departments with individual-gene sequencing illustrate both the usefulness of the technology and its complexities. Here I discuss how newborn screening programs investigate cystic fibrosis and, as another example, adrenoleukodystrophy through individual gene sequencing.

ETHICS EVALUATION REVEALING DECISION-MAKER MOTIVES: A CASE OF NEONATAL SCREENING.

OBJECTIVES: This paper aims to describe the added value of combining cost-effectiveness and ethical evaluations when the preferences of the decision maker toward cost-effectiveness evaluation outcomes are not known, with the French national neonatal screening of cystic fibrosis (CF) as a case-study. METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing four CF neonatal screening strategies, with or without DNA testing, was performed. Ethical positions toward their outcomes were described. In addition, a post-hoc analysis of the ethical issues being considered relevant from the decision-makers' perspective was conducted. RESULTS: Two strategies were found equally cost-effective. Among them, choosing the non-DNA or a DNA-based strategy constrains the decision maker to render a judgement between different ethical issues or disagreements associated with the screening program. CONCLUSIONS: The analysis supports the relevance of combining cost-effectiveness and ethics evaluation in developing health policy, as a way to reveal or clarify the motives associated with health. The choice of the decision maker to favor the DNA-based strategy, which was not originally recommended, creates the opportunity to make explicit the role played by ethical issues in the decision.

Implementing carrier screening for cystic fibrosis outside the clinic: ethical analysis in the light of the personalist view.

BACKGROUND: Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive genetic disease. Two models for screening CF are normally used: newborn screening and population-based CF carrier screening. In turn, there are three main models of population-based CF carrier screening: prenatal carrier screening, preconception carrier screening, and carrier screening outside clinical settings. AIM: To evaluate, in the light of the personalist view, the use of carrier screenings for CF outside the clinic, i.e. in non-clinical settings, such as school and workplaces. METHODS: Analysis has been carried out according to the "Personalist approach" (also called "Triangular model"), an ethical method for performing ethical analysis within HTA process. It includes factual, anthropological and ethical data in a ''triangular'' normative reflection process. FINDINGS: Implementing carrier screening for cystic fibrosis outside the clinical settings allows acquisition of knowledge for informing reproductive choices, that can be considered as valuable; benefit-risk ratio seems to be not much favorable; autonomous and responsible decisions can be taken only under certain conditions; economic advantage is difficult to determine; therefore, from a personalist view, implementing carrier screenings outside the clinic seems not to be ethically justified. CONCLUSIONS: In accordance with the personalist perspective, public health programs providing carrier screenings outside the clinic should not be implemented.

New tools and approaches to newborn screening: ready to open Pandora's box?

The landscape of newborn screening (NBS) is changing as new tools are developed. We must acknowledge that NBS is a very important and extraordinarily positive initiative especially for rare and serious inherited disorders; however, lessons learned from current NBS should guide the future of NBS as we enter the era of "omics" that will expand NBS for many other genetic disorders. In this article, I will first discuss new tools such as genomics and metabolomics for NBS. I will then turn to assessing how best to take advantage of new technical developments while considering the best interests of patients and the success of newborn screening.

Ethnicity impacts the cystic fibrosis diagnosis: A note of caution.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is by consensus based on the same parameters in all patients, yet the influence of ethnicity has only scarcely been studied. We aimed at elucidating the impact of Asian descent on the diagnosis of CF. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the CFTR2 and UK CF databases for clinical phenotype, sweat chloride values and CFTR mutations and compared the diagnostic characteristics of Asian to non-Asian patients with CF. RESULTS: Asian patients with CF do not have a worse clinical phenotype. The repeatedly reported lower FEV1 of Asian patients with CF is attributable to the influence of ethnicity on lung function in general. However, pancreatic sufficiency is more common in Asian patients with CF. The diagnosis of CF in people with Asian ancestry is heterogeneous as mean sweat chloride values are lower (92±26 versus 99±22mmol/L in controls) and 14% have sweat chloride values below 60mmol/L (versus 6% in non-Asians). Also, CFTR mutations differ from those in Caucasians: 55% of British Asian patients with CF do not have one mutation included in the routine newborn screening panel. CONCLUSIONS: Bringing together the largest cohort of patients with CF and Asian ethnicity, we demonstrate that Asian roots impact on all three CF diagnostic pillars. These findings have implications for clinical practice in the increasingly ethnically diverse Western population.

Saving Deaf Children? Screening for Hearing loss as a Public-interest Case.

New-born screening programs for congenital disorders and chronic disease are expanding worldwide and children "at risk" are identified by nationwide tracking systems at the earliest possible stage. These practices are never neutral and raise important social and ethical questions. An emergent concern is that a reflexive professionalism should interrogate the ever earlier interference in children's lives. The Flemish community of Belgium was among the first to generalize the screening for hearing loss in young children and is an interesting case to study the public justification of early interventions for families with deaf children. This article uses a critical lens to study the archive of the government child healthcare organization in Flanders in order to uncover underlying constructions of childhood, deafness, and preventive health. We focus on two interrelated themes. The first is the notion of exclusion of the human factor through the mediation of technology. The second is the idea of deafness as endangering a healthy development, an impairment that can nevertheless be treated if detected early enough. It is argued that, since deafness cannot be viewed as a life-threatening condition, the public interest which is implicitly defended is not the rescue of deaf children rather the exclusion of otherness.

Patients' perspectives on newborn screening for later-onset lysosomal storage diseases.

Lysosomal storage diseases (LSDs) are an individually rare but collectively common group of hereditary, progressive, multi-systemic disorders. Recent technological advances have brought newborn screening (NBS) for LSDs to attention in the United States. However, many LSD symptoms present in later childhood or adulthood, with a wide spectrum of severity. Because late-onset symptoms stray from the traditional NBS model, healthcare providers have expressed concerns about potential harm to patients and/or their families. In this study, 47 individuals with Fabry disease (FD), 22 with Gaucher disease (GD), and 22 with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) were surveyed regarding how their life might have been impacted by NBS. Of the 91 participants, none had symptoms at birth and 42 (46.7%) were symptom-free until adulthood. Over half (52.8%) were diagnosed ≥5years from symptom onset; of these, significantly more had FD (60%) or LOPD (63.6%) than GD (23.8%). However, length of diagnostic odyssey was not significantly correlated with opinion on NBS. Most participants either strongly agreed (45%) or agreed (33.3%) with NBS for their condition, with no significant differences between diseases. Opinions on NBS were correlated with participants' opinions on whether NBS would have resulted in better current health, but uncorrelated with disease severity or current life satisfaction. Significantly more participants with FD (42.6%) and LOPD (63.6%) than GD (13.6%) felt they would have greater life satisfaction had they been diagnosed as a newborn (p=0.007). Almost half (41%) of participants would have made different life decisions, including lifestyle, financial, and reproductive decisions. Regarding potential harm, participants were most concerned about insurability and least concerned about removal of children's autonomy. In conclusion, NBS is highly approved of among individuals with LSDs themselves, as it would significantly eliminate diagnostic odysseys and potentially alter life planning.

Newborn screening for SCID: lessons learned.

INTRODUCTION: Newborn screening (NBS) for Severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID)/severe T cell lymphopenia (sTCL) is being increasingly used worldwide. AREAS COVERED: In this manuscript we will discuss the following: 1) The rationale for screening newborns for SCID/sTCL; 2) The scientific basis for the use of the T cell receptor excision circle (TREC) assay in screening newborns for SCID/sTCL; 3) The published outcomes of current NBS programs. Expert commentary: 4) Some of the ethical dilemmas that occur when screening newborns for SCID. Finally, we will discuss the future directions for expanding NBS to include other primary immunodeficiencies.

Fifty years of newborn screening.

Newborn screening has evolved fast following recent advances in diagnosis and treatment of disease, particularly the development of multiplex testing and applications of molecular testing. Formal evidence of benefit from newborn screening has been largely lacking, due to the rarity of individual disorders. There are wide international differences in the choice of disorders screened, and ethical issues in both screening and not screening are apparent. More evidence is needed about benefit and harm of screening for specific disorders and renewed discussion about the basic aims of newborn screening must be undertaken.

To know or not to know, disclosure of a newborn carrier screening test result for cystic fibrosis.

PURPOSE: Most newborn screening (NBS) strategies for Cystic Fibrosis (CF) also identify carriers. However, it is unclear if parents want to be informed about their child's carrier status or not. METHODS: Focus group discussions with pregnant couples to explore their opinions about disclosure of a carrier result for CF of their newborn. RESULTS: All (n = 30) wanted to be informed when newborn screening would show their newborn being a CF-carrier. Their main reason was the implication of this knowledge for further family planning. Other family members could be informed and children within the family could be tested. Parents stated they have the right to know, but others also expressed that the choice of not being informed should be offered as well. CONCLUSION: Most parents want to be informed when NBS for CF reveals that their child is a CF-carrier, but the choice of not being informed should also be offered.

Ethical implications of newborn screening, life-limiting conditions, and palliative care.

While the first few days of an infant's life usually involve incorporation into a joyous family, this period can also be fraught with conditions that affect and potentially threaten survival. This article explores the ethical components of neonatal conditions such as disorders of sex development and metabolic disorders. Ethical issues surrounding futility, requests for unwarranted care, palliative care, and neonatal hospice are also discussed. Helping parents through the grief process and ensuring that they are provided opportunities to participate in important decisions for their neonate are key components of the nursing role. Implications for clinical practice are provided in the form of a case study and practical suggestions for assisting parents through these difficult situations.

Newborn screening: what pediatricians should know.

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on the current situation of neonatal screening worldwide and in Brazil. To define the role of pediatricians in neonatal screening programs. SOURCES: Scientific articles selected by means of searches run on the medical websites MEDLINE, Cochrane, PubMed (MeSH) and MD Consult, using the keywords newborn screening, neonatal, pediatrics, diagnosis, primary care, ethics and their equivalents in Portuguese, in isolation and in combination, in addition to medical textbooks on genetics and inborn errors of metabolism, published between January 1998 and December 2007, the National Neonatal Screening Program technical standards and routines manual, and Ministry of Health decree 822/2001. SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS: Published data demonstrate a great diversity in the number of diseases included in the neonatal screening programs of different countries. In Brazil, the National Neonatal Screening Program was set up in 2001, to screen for phenylketonuria, congenital hypothyroidism, sickle-cell anemia and cystic fibrosis. Screening for a wider range of conditions using mass spectrometry is currently the subject of disagreement and discussion of financial and ethical issues. CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal screening is one of the most important advances for the prevention of pediatric diseases. Nevertheless, implementation is complex, multidisciplinary and dependent on public health policies and, to date, there is no consensus on which diseases should be included. A large number of scientific and ethical questions need to be discussed in order to better define the screening panels to be implemented. Pediatricians have important roles to play in all stages of neonatal screening programs.

Is newborn screening for cystic fibrosis a basic human right?

Because it is clearly in the best interests of children with cystic fibrosis to be diagnosed early at <2 months, which can only be achieved routinely by newborn screening, it can be argued that this should be a human right. However, if more harm than good is likely, or if regional "readiness" does not exist, newborn screening should be deferred.

Newborn screening by tandem mass spectrometry: ethical and social issues.

Emerging technologies like Tandem Mass Spectrometry (TMS) enable multiple tests on a single blood sample and allow the expansion of Newborn Screening (NBS) to include various metabolic diseases. Introducing TMS for NBS raises important social and ethical questions: what are the criteria for adding disorders to screening panels? What evidence justifies expansion of screening? How can equity in NBS access and standards be ensured? How can policy standards be set, given the multiplicity of stakeholders? To address emerging issues, policy-makers, patient advocates, clinicians and researchers had a workshop during the 2005 Garrod Symposium. The participants received a summary of the discussion and understood the workshop's goal was to provide a basis for further discussion. This article contributes to this ongoing discussion. Several proposed recommendations assert the centrality of including social and ethical issues in the assessment of whether or not to introduce TMS. The article outlines five key recommendations for advancing the NBS agenda: national public health leadership; transparency; increased national consistency in NBS strategy, including minimum standards; collaboration between the federal and provincial/territorial governments and diverse stakeholders; and supporting research and/or programs based on effectiveness, which integrate ethical and social issues into assessment.