A systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome, recurrent thromboembolism, and bleeding after upper extremity vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Data on complications after upper extremity vein thrombosis (UEVT) are limited and heterogeneous. METHODS: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the pooled proportions of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence, bleeding, and post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) in patients with UEVT. A systematic literature review was conducted of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases from January 2000 to April 2023 in accordance with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. All studies included patients with UEVT and were published in English. Meta-analyses of VTE recurrence, bleeding, and of PTS after UEVT were performed to compute pooled estimates and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analyses of cancer-associated UEVT and catheter-associated venous thrombosis were conducted. Patients with Paget-Schroetter syndrome or effort thrombosis were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 55 studies with 15,694 patients were included. The pooled proportions for VTE recurrence, major bleeding, and PTS were 4.8% (95% CI, 3.8%-6.2%), 3.0% (95% CI, 2.2%-4.0%), and 23.8% (95% CI, 17.0%-32.3%), respectively. The pooled proportion of VTE recurrence was 2.7% (95% CI, 1.6%-4.6%) for patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), 1.7% (95% CI, 0.8%-3.7%) for patients treated with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and 4.4% (95% CI, 1.5%-11.8%) for vitamin K antagonists (VKAs; P = .36). The pooled proportion was 6.3% (95% CI, 4.3%-9.1%) for cancer patients compared with 3.1% (95% CI, 2.1%-4.6%) for patients without cancer (P = .01). The pooled proportion of major bleeding for patients treated with DOACs, LMWH, and VKAs, was 2.1% (95% CI, 0.9%-5.1%), 3.2% (95% CI, 1.4%-7.2%), and 3.4% (95% CI, 1.4%-8.4%), respectively (P = .72). The pooled proportion of PTS for patients treated with DOACs, LMWH, and VKAs was 11.8% (95% CI, 6.5%-20.6%), 27.9% (95% CI, 20.9%-36.2%), and 24.5% (95% CI, 17.6%-33.1%), respectively (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study suggest that UEVT is associated with significant rates of PTS and VTE recurrence. Treatment with DOACs might be associated with lower PTS rates than treatment with other anticoagulants.

Novel Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy Device for Treating Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis in Patient With Paget-Schroetter Syndrome.

Paget-Schroetter Syndrome (PSS) is a form of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) caused by the external compression of the subclavian vein at the thoracic outlet. Here we describe a complex PSS case in a 43-year-old female who experienced multiple recurrent DVTs and a right-sided hemothorax following two continuous aspiration thrombectomy procedures and a first rib resection. Rapid and complete symptom resolution was achieved with the InThrill Thrombectomy System (Inari Medical), a novel, thrombolytic-free, percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy device that removed all recurrent acute and subacute thrombus in a single session without significant blood loss.

Central venous catheter associated upper extremity deep vein thrombosis in cancer patients: Diagnosis and therapeutic management.

Catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) is a relatively frequent and potentially fatal complication arising in patients with cancer who require a central catheter placement for intravenous treatment. In everyday practice, CRT remains a challenge for management; despite its frequency and its negative clinical impact, few data are available concerning diagnosis and treatment of CRT. In particular, no diagnostic studies or clinical trials have been published that included exclusively patients with cancer and a central venous catheter (CVC). For this reason, many questions regarding optimal management of CRT remain unanswered. Due to the paucity of high-grade evidence regarding CRT in cancer patients, guidelines are derived from upper extremity DVT studies for diagnosis, and from those for lower limb DVT for treatment. This article addresses the issues of diagnosis and management of CRT through a review of the available literature and makes a number of proposals based on the available evidence. In symptomatic patients, venous ultrasound is the most appropriate choice for first-line diagnostic imaging of CRT because it is noninvasive, and its diagnostic performance is high (which is not the case in asymptomatic patients). In the absence of direct comparative clinical trials, we suggest treating patients with CRT with a therapeutic dose of either a LMWH or a direct oral factor Xa inhibitor, with or without a loading dose. These anticoagulants should be given for a total of at least three months, including at least one month after catheter removal following initiation of therapy.

Informe de un caso clínico con síndrome de Paget-Schroetter / Report of a clinical case with Paget-Schroetter Syndrome

Introducción: El síndrome de Paget-Schroetter (SPS) es una trombosis venosa profunda primaria del complejo venoso subclavio-axilar que ocurre después del uso repetitivo y extenuante de los hombros y los brazos. Muestra una incidencia de 1 por 100 000 personas al año. Se informa con mayor frecuencia en atletas jóvenes. Objetivo: Presentar un caso inusual de síndrome de Paget-Schroetter en un individuo joven no deportista. Caso clínico: Varón militar activo de 24 años de edad, sin antecedentes patológicos personales, que ingresó con inflamación del miembro superior izquierdo de 24 horas de evolución. Presentó una trombosis de la vena cefálica izquierda después de un esfuerzo físico de carga y descarga. Tras descartar trastornos secundarios de hipercoagulabilidad se le diagnosticó un SPS. Se le informó de la opción de intervención quirúrgica, pero la rechazó. El diagnóstico fue confirmado con ecografía Doppler y tratado con anticoagulación endovenosa al inicio y luego por vía oral durante 6 meses. Durante el seguimiento no se evidenció trombosis crónica de la vena cefálica izquierda ni formación de intervalo de colaterales vasculares. Conclusiones: El SPS es una condición clínica que necesita un alto índice de sospecha y un diagnóstico oportuno, por tanto, los médicos deben estar atentos a esta rara entidad para su reconocimiento temprano y derivación oportuna a cirugía vascular(AU)

Introduction: Paget-Schroetter syndrome (PSS) is a primary deep vein thrombosis of the subclavian-axillary venous complex that occurs after repetitive and strenuous use of the shoulders and arms. It shows an incidence of 1 per 100,000 people per year. It is reported more frequently in young athletes. Objective: To present an unusual case of Paget-Schroetter syndrome in a young non-athlete individual. Clinical case: 24-year-old active military man with no personal pathological history is presented, who was admitted with inflammation of the left upper limb of 24 hours of evolution. He presented a thrombosis of the left cephalic vein after a physical effort of loading and unloading. After ruling out secondary hypercoagulability disorders, he was diagnosed with SPS. He was informed of the option of surgical intervention, but he declined it. The diagnosis was confirmed with Doppler ultrasound and treated with intravenous anticoagulation at the beginning, and then orally for 6 months. During the follow-up of the patient, there was no evidence of chronic thrombosis of the left cephalic vein or interval formation of vascular collaterals. Conclusions: SPS is a clinical condition that requires a high index of suspicion and prompt diagnosis, therefore, physicians must be attentive to this rare entity for early recognition and timely referral to vascular surgery(AU)

Single-center experience with catheter-directed thrombolysis and balloon angioplasty for acute upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis: a case series study.

BACKGROUND: Effective treatment of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) is crucial to prevent further complications. Various treatments, including percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT), catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT), decompression surgery, and venoplasty are suggested for UEDVT. However, no prospective study has yet favored any of these treatments. This study presents a review of our experience with CDT followed by balloon venoplasty in patients with acute primary UEDVT. METHODS: We enrolled all patients diagnosed with acute UEDVT from January 2020 to June 2021. Subjects with UEDVT due to secondary causes like malignancies, indwelling catheters, or leads were excluded. CDT was performed through brachial vein access, using a perfusion catheter, and rt-PA administration. Balloon venoplasty was performed if the treated segment had remaining stenosis after CDT. Patients were followed up at the vein clinic for any signs and symptoms in the upper extremity and lifestyle changes. Follow-up ultrasonography was done 12 months after discharge. RESULTS: Twelve patients with a mean age of 41.08 ± 14.0 years were included in the study. The mean duration of CDT was 25.00 ± 10.56 h. After CDT, all patients had remaining occlusions, with seven having more than 50% remaining stenosis. However, after balloon venoplasty, no patient had significant (more than 50%) stenosis. There was no serious complication after both procedures. Patients were followed up for a mean duration of twelve months after their admission, with a mean time of maintenance anticoagulation was 10.73 ± 5.77 months. Only one patient had recurrent symptoms in his target limb which required a decompression surgery, while the rest were free of symptoms in their treated extremity. No subject developed pulmonary emboli (PE) during admission or the follow-up period. There was no evidence of hospital readmission for any reason. Upper extremity color-doppler sonography of the patients at twelve months after their procedure showed normal venous flow without any significant stenosis in 8 (66.7%), and partially normal flow with patent target vein in 4 (33.3%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: CDT followed by balloon venoplasty may be an effective treatment for selected patients with acute primary UEDVT, providing desirable long-term results and potentially avoiding the need for decompression surgery in the short or long term.

Results of a Flexible Patient-Centered Approach to the Timing of Thoracic Outlet Decompression in Paget Schroetter Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Treatment algorithms for subclavian vein (SCV) effort thrombosis (Paget-Schroetter syndrome- PSS) are multiple, ranging from thrombolysis (TL) with immediate or delayed thoracic outlet decompression (TOD) to conservative treatment with anticoagulation alone. We follow a regimen of TL/pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT) followed by TOD with first rib resection, scalenectomy, venolysis, and selective venoplasty (open or endovascular) performed electively at a time convenient for the patient. Oral anticoagulants are prescribed for 3 months or longer based upon response. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of this flexible protocol. METHODS: Clinical and procedural details of consecutive patients treated for PSS from January 2001 to August 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Endpoints included success of TL and eventual clinical outcome. Patients were divided into 2 groups-Group I: TL/PMT + TOD; Group II: medical management/anticoagulation + TOD. RESULTS: PSS was diagnosed in 114 patients; 104 (62 female, mean age 31 years) who underwent TOD were included in the study. Group I: 53 patients underwent TOD after initial TL/PMT (23 at our institution and 30 elsewhere) with success (acute thrombus resolution) in 80% (n = 20) and 72% (n = 24) respectively. Adjunctive balloon-catheter venoplasty was performed in 67%. TL failed to recanalize the occluded SCV in 11% (n = 6). Complete thrombus resolution was seen in 9% (n = 5). Residual chronic thrombus in 79% (n = 42) resulted in median SCV stenosis of 50% (range 10% to 80%). With continued anticoagulation, further thrombus retraction was noted with median 40% improvement in stenosis including in veins with unsuccessful TL. TOD was performed at a median of 1.5 months (range 2-8 months). Rethrombosis of the SCV occurred in 3 patients 1-3 days postoperatively and was managed with MT/SCV stenting/balloon angioplasty and anticoagulation. Symptomatic relief was achieved in 49/53 (92%) patients at a median follow-up of 14 months. Group II: 51 patients underwent TOD following medical treatment elsewhere with anticoagulation alone for an average 6 months (range 2-18 months) with recurrent SCV thrombosis in 5 (11%). Thirty-nine patients (76%) had persistent symptoms; the remaining had asymptomatic compression of the SCV with maneuvers. SCV occlusion persisted in 4 patients (7%); the indication for TOD being residual symptoms from compression of collateral veins, the median residual stenosis was 70% (range 30-90%). TOD was performed at a median of 6 months after diagnosis of PSS. Open venous reconstruction with endovenectomy and patch was performed in 4 patients and stenting in 2. Symptomatic relief was achieved in 46/51 (90%) at a median follow-up of 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: For Paget Schroetter syndrome a management protocol encompassing elective thoracic outlet decompression at a convenient time following thrombolysis is safe and effective, with low risk of rethrombosis. Continued anticoagulation in the interim results in further recanalization of the subclavian vein and may reduce the need for open venous reconstruction.

Risk for recurrence of symptomatic upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis in patients without cancer: Analysis of three RIETE cohorts.

BACKGROUND: The natural history of patients with a pacemaker-related upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) has not been consistently studied. METHODS: We used the RIETE registry data to compare the outcomes during anticoagulation and after its discontinuation in noncancer patients with symptomatic UEDVT associated with a pacemaker, other catheters, or no catheter. The major outcome was the composite of symptomatic pulmonary embolism or recurrent DVT. RESULTS: As of February 2022, 2578 patients with UEDVT were included: 156 had a pacemaker-related UEDVT, 557 had other catheters, and 1865 had no catheter. During anticoagulation, 61 patients (2.3%) developed recurrent VTE, 38 had major bleeding (1.4%), and 90 died (3.4%). After its discontinuation, 52 patients (4.4%) had recurrent acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) and six had major bleeding (0.5%). On multivariable analysis, there were no differences among subgroups in the rates of VTE recurrences or major bleeding during anticoagulation. After its discontinuation, patients with a pacemaker-related UEDVT had a higher risk for VTE recurrences than those with no catheter (adjusted OR: 4.59; 95% CI: 1.98-10.6). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pacemaker-related UEDVT are at increased risk for VTE recurrences after discontinuing anticoagulation. If our findings are validated in adequately designed trials, this may justify changes in the current recommendations on the duration of anticoagulation.

Hybrid Paraclavicular Decompression for Venous Thoracic Outlet Syndrome with Primary Endovascular Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Venous thoracic outlet syndrome (vTOS) is characterized by severe stenosis and potential thrombosis of the axillary-subclavian vein (effort thrombosis) with significant effects on patient mobility, quality of life, and risks associated with possible anticoagulation. Treatment goals are aimed at symptomatic improvement and freedom from recurrent thrombosis. To date, there exist no clear protocols or recommendations on surgical approach that result in optimal outcomes. We highlight our institution's experience with a systematized, paraclavicular approach with intraoperative balloon angioplasty only, if needed. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series identifying 33 patients that underwent thoracic outlet decompression for vTOS from 2014 to 2021 via paraclavicular approach at Trinity Health Ann Arbor. Demographics, presenting symptoms, perioperative details, and follow-up details describing symptomatic improvement and imaging surveillance were obtained. RESULTS: The average age of our patients was 37 years with the most common presenting symptoms of pain and swelling (91%). The average time from diagnosis to thrombolysis for effort thrombosis was 4 days, with an average time to operative intervention of 46 days. All patients underwent a paraclavicular approach with full first rib resection, anterior and middle scalenectomy, subclavian vein venolysis, and intraoperative venogram. Of these, 20 (61%) underwent endovascular balloon angioplasty, 1 required balloon with stent placement, 13 (39%) required no additional intervention, and no patients required surgical reconstruction of the subclavian-axillary vein. Duplex imaging was used to evaluate recurrence in 26 patients at an average of 6 months postop. Of these, 23 demonstrated complete patency (89%), 1 demonstrated chronic nonocclusive thrombus, and 2 demonstrated chronic occlusive thrombus. Almost all our patients (97%) had moderate or significant improvement of their symptoms. None of our patients required a subsequent operation for recurrence of symptomatic thrombosis. The mode length of anticoagulation use postoperatively was 3 months, with an average use of 4.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: A systematized surgical approach of paraclavicular decompression for venous thoracic outlet syndrome with primary endovascular balloon angioplasty carries minimal morbidity with excellent functional results and symptomatic relief.

Ten-year Experience of Surgical Management of Paget-Schroetter Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Paget-Schroetter syndrome (PSS) or effort-induced thrombosis is an acute (<14 days) venous thrombosis of the axillosubclavian vein. Early catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) is required to improve patency rate and avoid postthrombotic syndrome. This study aimed to report the management of PSS in our center across 10 years and compare it to the established guidelines. METHODS: Some of the selected patients were treated with CDT if the diagnosis of acute vein thrombosis was established 6 weeks after the appearance of the first symptoms and if a vascular surgeon was involved in the care and management of the patient. Patients underwent first rib removal 6 weeks after the CDT. Some patients with primary upper limb venous thrombosis were not immediately referred to a vascular surgeon after the initial diagnosis. They were instead discharged home with the prescription of oral anticoagulation therapy (OAT) alone for at least 3 months. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2020, 426 first rib removal procedures were performed for 338 patients with thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) at our center. Among them, 18 (4.2%) patients with PSS were identified. 5 (27.8%) patients underwent CDT. The median duration between first symptoms and thrombolysis was 10 days (range, 1-32). Thirteen (72.2%) patients were discharged home with OAT alone and referred to a vascular surgeon with a median time of 365 days (range, 8-6,422) for TOS diagnosis. Postthrombotic syndrome was noticed in 5 (38%) patients in the OAT group and 1 (20%) patient in the CDT group. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the guidelines being in favor of early CDT in PSS, most patients are discharged home with OAT alone. The study findings demonstrate that better information about this specific complication must be provided to the concerned practitioners who are likely to encounter such patients.

Different diagnostic strategies using D-dimer for peripherally inserted central catheter-related upper extremity deep vein thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the upper extremities caused by a peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) is distinct from the typical DVT. This specific type of mural thrombus might have an effect on the D-dimer levels. In the present study, we aimed to ascertain whether the D-dimer level might be considered an independent diagnostic marker to rule out upper extremity DVT caused by PICCs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case-cohort study of 205 patients who had undergone D-dimer measurement and color Doppler ultrasound within 14 days after placement of a PICC to December 31, 2020, from January 1, 2018. The participants were followed up for 3 months to evaluate for upper extremity DVT. In addition, different D-dimer diagnostic strategies were analyzed. RESULTS: Of the 205 included patients, 53 (25.9%) had had a negative D-dimer level. Of the 53 patients, 10 had had upper extremity DVT attributable to a PICC using color Doppler ultrasound. Of these 10 patients, 3 had developed upper extremity DVT during the 3-month follow-up. Using the various D-dimer diagnostic techniques, the negative predictive value for the D-dimer levels was 81.1%. CONCLUSIONS: The present study has shown that the different D-dimer diagnostic strategies are not effective for safely excluding the diagnosis of suspected PICC-related upper extremity DVT. Adding PICC placement as a special factor in the modified Wells score, in addition to the D-dimer level, could securely rule out PICC-related upper extremity DVT; however, the diagnostic efficacy was low.

Surgical decompression among Paget-Schroetter patients with subacute and chronic venous occlusion.

OBJECTIVE: Management of Paget-Schroetter syndrome (PSS) with first rib resection (FRR) and venoplasty is successful in re-establishing subclavian vein (SCV) patency in most cases. However, in cases with subacute or chronic venous occlusion, SCV patency may not be achieved. Thus, the role for FRR remains controversial in cases of subacute or chronic SCV occlusion. Our goal is to determine whether FRR is beneficial in PSS patients with subacute or chronic SCV occlusion. METHODS: A prospectively maintained thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) database was searched for patients undergoing FRR who were identified as having SCV occlusion on preoperative venography between 2012 and 2021. Preoperative and postoperative venous patency were determined by venography. Standardized functional outcomes were assessed using the Quick Disability Arm, Shoulder, Hand (QuickDASH-QDS) and Somatic Pain Scale (SPS) before and after FRR. The Derkash outcome score was recorded after FRR. RESULTS: Over the study period, 966 TOS operations were performed; of these, 401 were for venous TOS, and 33 patients were identified with subacute or chronic preoperative SCV occlusion verified by venography. The median age was 29 years, with 73% men. Eighteen patients had attempted thrombolysis; eight were performed at our institution, and ten performed at a referring facility. The median time from the symptom onset of SCV occlusion to FRR was 78 days for all patients. For the group that achieved venous patency after FRR, the time from SCV occlusion to FRR was 71 days, and it was 106 days for the group that remained occluded after FRR. All underwent postoperative venography and percutaneous attempt at SCV recanalization. Recanalization was successful in 64% (21) and unsuccessful in 36% (12). All patients experienced improvement in SPS and QDS. For all patients, the average SPS improved from 1.69 preoperatively to 0.25 postoperatively and the average QDS improved from 27.63 preoperatively to 10.19 postoperatively (P > .05). For patients who were successfully recanalized, the final SPS was 0.18 and the final QDS was 11.22 (P > .05). In patients who failed to achieve recanalization, the final SPS was 0.40 and the final QDS was 9.06 (P > .05). All postoperative Derkash outcome scores were excellent and good, with none fair or poor. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with subacute or chronic preoperative SCV occlusion, surgical decompression and postoperative angioplasty resulted in re-establishing SCV patency in 64% of patients. Symptomatic patients clinically improve after surgical decompression regardless of whether venous patency is successfully re-established. These results indicate that symptomatic patients with PSS should be considered for TOS decompression even if their SCV is occluded in the subacute or chronic presentation.

Preoperative thrombolysis is associated with improved vein patency and functional outcomes after first rib resection in acute Paget-Schroetter syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: Most patients with acute Paget-Schroetter syndrome (PSS) present in one of two manners: (1) thrombosis managed initially with thrombolysis and anticoagulation and then referred for surgery, and (2) initial treatment with anticoagulation only and later referral for surgery. Definitive benefits of thrombolysis in the acute period (the first 2 weeks after thrombosis) over anticoagulation alone have not been well reported. Our goal was to compare patients managed with early thrombolysis and anticoagulation followed by first rib resection (FRR) and later postoperative venography with venoplasty (PTA) with those managed with anticoagulation alone followed by FRR and PTA using vein patency assessed with venography and standardized outcome measures. METHODS: We reviewed a prospectively collected database from 2000 to 2019. Two groups were compared: those managed with early thrombolysis at our institution (Lysis) and those managed with anticoagulation alone (NoLysis). All patients underwent FRR. Venography was routinely performed before and after FRR. Standardized outcome measures included Quick Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores and Somatic Pain Scale. RESULTS: A total of 50 Lysis and 50 NoLysis patients were identified. Pre-FRR venography showed that thrombolysis resulted in patency of 98% of veins, whereas 78% of NoLysis veins were patent. After FRR, postoperative venography revealed that 46 (92%) patients in the Lysis group and 37 (74%) patients in the NoLysis group achieved vein patency. Thrombolysis was significantly associated with final vein patency (odds ratio: 17 [4-199]; P < .001). Lysis patients had a trend toward lower QuickDASH scores from pre-FRR to post-FRR compared with NoLysis patients with a mean difference of -16.4 (±19.7) vs -5.2 (±15.6) points (P = .13). The difference in reduction of Somatic Pain Scale scores was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Thrombolysis as initial management of PSS, combined with anticoagulation, followed by FFR and VenoPTA resulted in improved final vein patency and may lead to an improved functional outcome measured with QuickDASH scores. Therefore, clinical protocols using thrombolysis as initial management should be considered when planning the optimal treatment strategy for patients with acute PSS.

Upper Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis Risk Factors, Associated Morbidity and Mortality in Trauma Patients.

BACKGROUND: The literature on upper extremity deep venous thrombosis (UEDVT) is not as abundant as that on lower extremities. This study aimed to identify the risk factors for UEDVT, associated mortality and morbidity in trauma patients and the impact of pharmacological prophylaxis therein. METHODS: A 3-year retrospective review of patients admitted to a Level 1 trauma center was conducted. Patients aged 18 years or older who had experienced a traumatic event and had undergone an upper extremity ultrasound (UEUS) were included in the study. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors that contributed to UEDVT. RESULTS: A total of 6,607 patients were admitted due to traumatic injuries during the study period, of whom 5.6% (373) had at least one UEUS during their hospitalization. Fifty-six (15%) were diagnosed with an UEDVT, as well as three non-fatal pulmonary emboli (PE) and four (7.1%) deaths, p = 0.03. Pharmacological prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin showed a protective effect against UEDVT; among the patients positive for UEDVT, 14 of 186 patients (7.5%) received LMWH, while 42 of 195 (21.5%) did not receive LMWH (p < 0.001). Multiple logistic regression revealed that the presence of upper extremity fractures, peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) lines, and traumatic brain injury (TBI) were independent risk factors for UEDVT. CONCLUSIONS: UEDVT are associated with a higher mortality. The presence of upper extremity fractures, PICC lines, and TBI were independent risk factors for UEDVTs. Further, pharmacological prophylaxis reduces the risk of UEDVT.

Optimal management of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis: Is venous thoracic outlet syndrome underrecognized?

BACKGROUND: Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) accounts for ~10% of all cases of DVT. In the most widely referenced general review of DVT, the American Academy of Chest Physicians essentially recommended that UEDVT be treated identically to that of lower extremity DVT, with anticoagulation the default therapy. However, the medical literature has not differentiated well between DVT in the arm vs DVT in the leg and has not emphasized the effects of the costoclavicular junction and the lack of the effect of gravity to the point at which UEDVT due to extrinsic bony compression at the costoclavicular junction is classified as "primary." METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature review, beginning with both Medline and Google Scholar searches, in addition to collected references. Next, we manually reviewed the relevant citations within the initial reports studied. Both surgical and medical journals were explored. RESULTS: It has been proposed that "effort thrombosis" should be classified as a secondary cause of UEDVT, limiting the definition of "primary" to that which is truly idiopathic. Other causes of secondary UEDVT include catheter- and pacemaker-related thrombosis (the most common cause but often asymptomatic), thrombosis related to malignancy and hypercoagulable conditions, and the rare case of thrombosis due to compression of the vein by a focal malignancy or other space-occupying lesion. In true primary UEDVT and those secondary cases in which no mechanical cause is present or can be corrected, anticoagulation remains the treatment of choice, usually for 3 months or the duration of a needed catheter. However, evidence has suggested that many cases of effort thrombosis are likely missed by a too-narrow adherence to this protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Because proper treatment of effort thrombosis would decrease the long-term symptomatic status rate from 50% to almost 0% and because these are healthy patients with a long lifespan, we believe that a more aggressive attitude toward thrombolysis should be followed for any patient with a reasonable degree of suspicion for venous thoracic outlet syndrome.

Comparison of aspiration thrombectomy to other endovascular therapies for proximal upper extremity deep venous thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: Catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) provides an effective method for clearing deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Unfortunately, CDT is associated with hemorrhagic complications. This study evaluated the technical success of the various endovascular therapies including a new mechanical aspiration thrombectomy (AT) device for the treatment of acute upper extremity DVT (UEDVT). METHODS: This single-center retrospective review included patients with acute symptomatic proximal UEDVT secondary to venous thoracic outlet syndrome. Undergoing endovascular therapy from December 2013 to June 2019. Patients were treated with a variety of methods including CDT, ultrasound-assisted thrombolysis (USAT), rheolytic thrombectomy, and AT. We evaluated outcomes for patients undergoing AT compared with nonaspiration thrombectomy (NAT) techniques. The primary outcome was technical success, defined as resolution of more than 70% of the thrombus. The secondary end point was the ability to complete the therapy in a single session. RESULTS: There were 22 patients who had endovascular management of their symptomatic proximal UEDVT. All 22 patients (100%) were successfully treated with more than a 70% thrombus resolution. Ten patients underwent AT, of which 50% (5/10) had single session therapies. Twelve patients underwent NAT (three had CDT or USAT alone; three had USAT with rheolytic thrombectomy; and six had CDT followed by rheolytic thrombectomy), with single session therapy occurring in only 8.3% of the NAT group (1/12). The average total dose of thrombolytics was 12.6 ± 9.65 mg in the AT group compared with 19.0 ± 5.78 mg in the NAT group (mean difference, -6.4; 95% confidence interval, -1.1 to 13.9). All but one of the patients in the AT group went on to have successful first rib resections. All NAT patients had successful first rib resections. A venogram was not performed at the time of decompression. All patients except one underwent resection via the infraclavicular approach, with rib removal posterior to the brachial plexus, a median of 8.0 (interquartile range, 6.0-12.0) days after DVT therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a technical success rate of 100% was achieved for acute symptomatic proximal UEDVT therapies. AT technology allows for higher rates of treatment in a single session, thereby minimizing a patient's risks of bleeding complications. More research is needed to further define the role of this new technology in the treatment paradigm of UEDVT management.

Importancia de la disponibilidad de la ecografía en el primer nivel de atención: reporte de caso / Importance of the availability of ultrasound scans in Primary Health Care: case report

La ecografía de pie de cama se ha abierto paso en diferentes escenarios como método para disminuir la incertidumbre diagnóstica. Existen ya numerosas publicaciones que dan cuenta que el uso de ecografía aumenta la capacidad resolutiva del primer nivel de atención. Este reporte de caso intenta poner en evidencia como la ecografía accesible en el primer nivel puede resolver un proceso de moderada complejidad diagnóstica, evitando demoras, y así también mayores complicaciones (AU)

Bedside ultrasonography has made its way into different settings as a method to reduce diagnostic uncertainty. There are already numerous publications that show that the use of ultrasonography increa-ses the resolution capacity of the first level of care. This case report tries to show how accessible ultrasound at the first level can solve a process of moderate diagnostic complexity, avoiding delays, and thus also greater complications (AU)

Primary upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (effort thrombosis).

Primary spontaneous upper extremity deep vein thrombosis is characterised by thrombosis within deep veins draining the upper extremity due to anatomical abnormalities of the thoracic outlet causing axillosubclavian compression and subsequent thrombosis. It is an uncommon condition that typically presents with unilateral arm swelling in a young male following vigorous upper extremity activity. The diagnosis of this condition is usually made by Doppler ultrasound, but other investigations are mandatory to exclude the secondary causes of upper extremity DVT. Different treatment options are available including anticoagulation, thrombolysis, and surgery. We report the case of a young healthy male with athletic physique who presented with pain and swelling of his dominant arm after weightlifting in the gym.

Phlegmasia Cerulea Dolens in the Upper Extremity: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Phlegmasia cerulea dolens (PCD) is a rare condition characterized by deep venous thrombosis with gangrene. It can result in critically severe edema that affects the blood supply to the limbs. PCD generally occurs in the lower rather than upper extremity. We herein present a case report of upper extremity PCD and discuss thrombophilia secondary to low protein S activity as the main cause. Catheter-directed thrombolysis via the occluded end of the artery may be one of the best treatment methods for PCD.

Surgical Considerations in the Treatment of Axillary-Subclavian Venous Thrombosis in the Era of COVID-19.

PURPOSE: Traditional treatment of axillary-subclavian venous thrombosis is resource intensive due to the need for advanced nursing care and increased utilization of intensive care units for thrombolysis procedures. We recently encountered this in the management of 2 patients with effort-induced upper extremity venous thrombosis following COVID-19 infection and offer a treatment paradigm for consideration. CASE REPORTS: A 30-year-old presented with 2 weeks of left upper extremity symptoms following COVID-19 infection. Duplex ultrasound demonstrated axillary-subclavian venous thrombosis and venogram confirmed total occlusion of the axillary and subclavian veins with profuse collaterals around the occlusion. Suction thrombectomy was performed successfully and veins remained patent at 6 month follow up. The patient declined first rib resection and stopped lifting weights. A 16-year-old presented with 4 days of right arm symptoms 1 month after testing positive for COVID-19. Duplex ultrasound revealed acute axillary and subclavian vein thrombosis and she underwent successful thrombectomy followed by balloon angioplasty with improvement in symptoms. CONCLUSION: The pandemic has strained health care resources such that the treatment of non-life-threatening conditions must be triaged to conserve resources. While axillary-subclavian venous occlusion is usually not life-threatening, timely treatment leads to decreased morbidity and better outcomes. Percutaneous aspiration and thrombectomy without adjunctive thrombolysis may be of benefit in reducing healthcare resource utilization while still achieving good outcomes during the COVID pandemic and beyond.

Resección de la primera costilla por videotoracoscopía en síndrome de Paget-Schroetter / Resection of the first rib by video thoracoscopy in Paget-Schroetter syndrome

Resumen El síndrome del opérculo torácico se refiere a una serie de signos y síntomas que se producen por la compresión del paquete vásculo-nervioso en la unión costo-clavicular. El síndrome de Paget-Schroetter (SPS) se define como la trombosis primaria, espontánea o de esfuerzo de la vena subclavia. Las vías de abordaje quirúrgicas tradicionales utilizadas para descomprimir el opérculo torácico son la trans axilar y las claviculares (supra e infra). El objetivo del estudio fue describir nuestra experiencia en la resección de la primera costilla por videotoracoscopía (VATS). Este es un estudio descriptivo observacional utilizando una base de datos prospectiva con análisis retrospectivo desde enero de 2017 a marzo de 2020. Se incluyeron 9 pacientes con diagnóstico de SPS en los que se resecó la primera costilla por VATS. En un paciente el procedimiento fue bilateral por presentar trombosis espontánea en ambas venas subclavias. De los 9, 6 eran mujeres. La edad media fue de 30.7 ± 10.7 años. La estadía hospitalaria media fue de 3.1 ± 0.5 días. Uno fue re-operado por hemotórax. No se detectaron recurrencias en el seguimiento a mediano-largo plazo. La resección de la primera costilla por VATS es un procedimiento seguro y factible. La misma, a diferencia de los abordajes tradicionales, puede ser resecada bajo visión directa de todos los elementos del opérculo torácico. Sin embargo, esta técnica requiere un manejo avanzado en cirugía toracoscópica.

Abstract Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) refers to a number of signs and symptoms that arise from compression of the neurovascular bundle at the costoclavicular junction. Paget-Schroetter syndrome is defined as the primary, spontaneous or effort thrombosis of the subclavian vein. The supraclavicular and trans-axillary approaches are currently the most commonly used for first rib resection. The aim of this article was to describe our experience in a minimally invasive approach (VATS) of first rib resection for primary venous thoracic outlet and the associated outcomes. This is a descriptive observational study using a retrospective analysis of a prospective database from January 2017 to March 2020. Nine patients underwent video thoracoscopic first rib resection due to PagetSchroetter syndrome (one bilateral procedure). Ten thoracoscopic first rib resections were performed. There were 6 female and 3 male patients, with a mean age of 30.7 ± 10.7 years. The mean length of hospital stay was 3.1 ± 0.5 days. No complications were recorded intraoperatively. One patient had to be re-operated because of hemothorax. There were no recurrences in a follow-up of at least 12 months. VATS resection of the first rib is a safe and feasible procedure and can be performed under direct vision of thoracic outlet elements. However, the technique requires experience with thoracoscopic surgery. The outcomes associated with our technique are comparable with the outcomes related to other current standards of care.