NLCECA score: a serum inflammatory-tumor biomarker score to predict survival of advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma after hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy.

Prognostic features in advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) patients who received first-line hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) are unknown. The purpose of our study was to develop an applicable score based on serum inflammatory-tumor biomarkers to predict the survival of advanced pCCA patients who received first-line HAIC. In total, 106 advanced pCCA patients were enrolled as the training cohort. The optimal cutoff values of baseline variables were defined by the receiver operating characteristic method or according to previous publications. According to the results of Cox regression analysis, baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 3.19, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) > 10 ng/mL, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) > 200 U/mL were identified as independent survival predictors, which were used to develop the NLCECA score (NLR, CEA, and CA19-9). When including the NLCECA score in the multivariate analysis, the NLCECA score was the only independent predictor of survival. The risk of survival decreased by 111.9% for each 1-point increase in the NLCECA score. Additionally, the NLCECA score could also predict survival in another 33 patients in the validation cohort (P < 0.001). In summary, the NLCECA score is a potential biomarker system for predicting the survival of advanced pCCA patients who received first-line HAIC.

Complete response of recurrent perihilar cholangiocarcinoma following sintilimab combined with lenvatinib plus S-1: a case report and review of literature.

Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is a refractory malignancy with an unfavorable prognosis and a high probability of recurrence. Systemic chemotherapy is critical for palliative treatment, but effective therapeutic strategies for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma after first-line chemotherapy failure are scarce. Here, we introduced a sustained benefit following sintilimab combined with lenvatinib plus S-1 in a patient with recurrent perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. A 52-year-old female patient was admitted to our hospital due to yellow skin and sclera, and further radiological examination revealed perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. The patient underwent surgery and histopathological results confirmed moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma with metastatic lymph nodes. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 was given. One year after surgery, the patient experienced hepatic recurrence. Then, she received radiofrequency ablation combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin. Unfortunately, radiological assessment revealed progressive disease with multiple liver metastases after treatment. Subsequently, she received sintilimab combined with lenvatinib plus S-1 and the lesions were completely regressed following 14 cycles of combination therapy. The patient recovered well without disease recurrence at the last follow-up. Sintilimab combined with lenvatinib plus S-1 may be an alternative therapeutic option for chemotherapy-refractory perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, and further evaluation in a larger number of patients is needed.

Safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on our resectability criteria for locally advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is not commonly used for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC). This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of NAC for PHC. METHODS: Ninety-one PHC patients without metastases were treated at our department. Patients were classified as resectable (R), borderline resectable (BR), or locally advanced unresectable (LA). Upfront surgery (US) was performed for R-PHC patients without regional lymph node metastases (LNM) or those unable to tolerate NAC. The NAC regimen comprised two courses of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for advanced PHC: R-PHC with LNM, BR, and LA. RESULTS: US and NAC were performed on 32 and 59 patients, respectively. For US, 31 patients underwent curative intent surgery (upfront-CIS). NAC caused adverse effects in 10/59 (17%), allowed 36/59 (61%) to undergo curative intent surgery (NAC-CIS) without impairing liver function, and spared 23/59 (39%) from undergoing resection (NAC-UR). Overall survival was better in the upfront-CIS and NAC-CIS groups than in the NAC-UR group (MST: 74 vs 57 vs 17 months, p < 0.001). In 59 NAC patients, tumour size response occurred in 11/11 (100%) of R, 22/33 (66.7%) of BR, and 9/15 (60.0%) of LA patients. The un-resection rate was the highest in the LA group (27% [3/11] than in R, 30% [10/33] in BR, and 67% [10/15] in LA, p = 0.039). Multivariate analyses revealed that LA and age were independent risk factors for non-resection after NAC. CONCLUSION: was safe and contributed to improving survival in advanced PHC patients. R-PHC was responsive to NAC, but LA remains a risk factor for non-resection through NAC.

Durable Response after Olaparib Treatment for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma with Germline BRCA2 Mutation.

INTRODUCTION: Despite major advances in surveillance and management, advanced cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) still carries a dismal prognosis. In recent years, several actionable genomic alterations in pancreatobiliary malignancies have been identified. For instance, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) has been considered a predictive biomarker of clinical response to platinum and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. CASE REPORT: A 53-year-old man with a stage 3 (T4N0M0) BRCA2-mutant CCA developed intolerable toxicity after 44 cycles of gemcitabine/cisplatin. In light of his HRD positivity, treatment was switched to single-agent olaparib. The patient showed a partial radiological response, which was maintained after 8 months of olaparib discontinuation (progression-free survival >36 months). CONCLUSION: Given the durable response observed, olaparib can be a valuable therapeutic tool in BRCA-mutant CCAs. Ongoing and future clinical trials are needed to confirm the role of PARP inhibition in similar patients and to define the clinicopathological and molecular profile of the individuals most likely to benefit.

Impact of Gemcitabine Plus S1 Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Borderline Resectable Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Surgical resection is the only curative strategy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC), but recurrence rates are high even after purported curative resection. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine/S-1 (GS) combination chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting. METHODS: In an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with GS, repeated every 21 days, was administered for three cycles to patients with histologic or cytologically confirmed borderline resectable (BR) PHC who were eligible for inclusion in the study. In this study, BR PHC was defined as positive for lymph node metastasis and for cancerous vascular invasion or Bismuth type 4 on preoperative imaging. The primary end point consisted of the 3- and 5-year survival rates. The secondary end points were feasibility, resection rate, and pathologic effect. RESULTS: The study enrolled 60 patients between January 2011 and December 2016. With respect to toxicity, the major adverse effect was neutropenia, which reached grade 3 or 4 in 53.3% of cases. The overall disease control rate was 91.3%. The median survival time for the entire cohort was 30.3 months. For all the patients, the estimated 3-year survival rate was 44.1%, and the 5-year survival rate was 30.0%. Resection with curative intent was performed for 43 (71%) of the 60 patients. For 81% of the resected patients, R0 resection was performed, and Clavien-Dindo grade 3 complications or a higher morbidity rate was seen in 41% of the patients. The median survival time was 50.1 months for the resected and 14.8 months for the unresected patients. For the resected patients, the estimated 3-year survival rate was 55.8%, and the estimated 5-year survival rate was 36.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Gemcitabine/S-1 combination NAC has promising efficacy and good tolerability for patients with BR PHC.

Benefits and safety of photodynamic therapy in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a therapy evaluated for the treatment of cancers resistant to standard oncological treatments. PDT might be beneficial for the palliation of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PDT for treating hilar cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for articles published up to May 2021. The patients were grouped as PDT+stent vs. stent alone. The outcomes were survival, quality of life, and adverse events (AEs). Data were summarized using hazard ratios (HRs), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Six studies were included in this meta-analysis. There were 235 and 211 patients in the PDT+stent and stent groups, respectively. The 1-year survival rate of the PDT+stent group was 0.56, and that of the control group was 0.25. The 2-year survival rate of the PDT+stent group was 0.16, and that of the control group was 0.07. PDT significantly prolonged overall survival compared to the controls (P = 0.002). No differences were detected in the occurrence of cholangitis (P = 0.996) and all other AEs (early complications, stent malfunction, total AEs, acute pancreatitis, liver abscess, and biliary hemorrhage) between the two groups. CONCLUSION: PDT in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma could improve survival without additional AEs. Large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the findings.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A population-based comparative cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Data supporting routine use of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) compared to no AC (noAC) for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (hCCA) is unclear. This study aimed to determine whether AC improves long-term survival following resection for hCCA. METHODS: Patients receiving resection for hCCA followed by AC or no AC from 2010 to 2016 were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Propensity score matching (PSM) and Cox regression was performed to account for selection bias and analyze impact of AC on overall survival. RESULTS: Of 924 (56%) noAC and 719 (44%) AC, 320 noAC and 320 AC patients remained after PSM. After matching, AC was associated with improved survival (median: 28.2 vs 19.9 months, p < 0.001), which remained after multivariable adjustment (HR: 0.61, CI95%: 0.50-0.75, p < 0.001). On multivariable interaction analyses, the benefit of AC over no AC persisted irrespective of nodal status: N0 (HR: 0.62, CI95%: 0.41-0.92, p = 0.019), N1 (HR: 0.52, CI95%: 0.36-0.75, p = 0.001), N2 (HR: 0.31, CI95%: 0.11-0.90, p = 0.032), Nx (HR: 0.22, CI95%: 0.09-0.55, p = 0.001) and margin status: R0 (HR: 0.74, CI95%: 0.57-0.97, p = 0.026), R1 (HR: 0.31, CI95%: 0.21-0.47, p < 0.001). Stratified analysis by nodal, margin and AC status demonstrated consistent results. CONCLUSION: AC following resection for hCCA was associated with improved survival in this study, even in margin-negative and node-negative disease. These findings suggest incorporation of AC into multimodality therapy for hCCA in all cases, where appropriate.

Chemotherapy plus concurrent irreversible electroporation improved local tumor control in unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma compared with chemotherapy alone.

INTRODUCTION: Unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (UHC) is a malignant tumor and has a poor prognosis. IRE is a novel non-thermal ablative therapy that causes cellular apoptosis via electrical impulses. To compare the curative effect for UHC, chemotherapy plus concurrent IRE and chemotherapy alone were set up. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2015 to May 2019, 47 patients with UHC were analyzed to chemotherapy + IRE group (n = 23) or chemotherapy alone group (n = 24) in this study. Treatment response was assessed with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) 1 month after treatment and every 3 months thereafter. Local tumor progression (LTP), time to LTP, overall survival (OS) and procedure-related complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Chemotherapy plus concurrent IRE group showed a tendency toward a decreased rate of LTP (16.7% vs. 39.5%; p = 0.039) and an increased complete response rate (52.2% vs. 12.5%; p = 0.011) compared with chemotherapy alone group. Time to LTP was significantly longer in the chemotherapy plus concurrent IRE group compared to chemotherapy alone group (11.2 months vs. 4.2 months; p = 0.001). Median OS was significantly longer in the chemotherapy plus concurrent IRE group compared to chemotherapy alone group (19.6 months vs. 10.2 months; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy plus concurrent IRE improved local control and prolonged time to LTP and OS in patients with UHC.

Survival Outcomes of Gemcitabine Plus S-1 Adjuvant Chemotherapy after Surgical Resection for Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The usefulness of adjuvant chemotherapy in biliary tract cancer (BTC) is poorly reported. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) chemotherapy after curative surgical resection for BTC. METHODS: 225 BTC patients who underwent surgical resection between January 2006 and May 2019 were enrolled in this study. Twenty-seven patients received adjuvant chemotherapy with GS (GS group), whereas 67 patients underwent surgery alone (S group). Twenty-three matching pairs were derived through propensity score (PS) matching analysis. Patients received 12 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy (70 mg/m2 oral S-1 for 7 consecutive days plus intravenous gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 on day 7). The primary end point was recurrence-free survival (RFS). The secondary end points were the 1-, 2-, and 3-year RFS and overall survival (OS) rates, tolerability, and frequency of grade 3/4 toxicity. RESULTS: The completion rate was 81.5%; no treatment-related deaths were observed. Grade 3/4 adverse events were seen in 40.7% of the patients. RFS (3-year RFS rate: 59.3% vs. 39.1%, p = 0.049) and OS (3-year OS rate: 71.7% vs. 53.4%, p = 0.008) were significantly better in the GS group than in the S group among PS-matched pairs. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: GS chemotherapy after curative surgery was well tolerated, showed better clinical benefit in the adjuvant setting, and can effectively reduce BTC recurrence.

Adjuvant S-1 vs gemcitabine for node-positive perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score-adjusted analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for biliary cancers remains controversial because of conflicting results from previous phase 3 studies that used different key drugs and enrolled patients with heterogeneous tumor sites and disease stages. Fluoropyrimidine seems more beneficial than gemcitabine (GEM) combination regimens in the adjuvant setting; however, data comparing the survival benefit between GEM- and fluoropyrimidine-based regimens are lacking. METHODS: Patients who underwent resection for node-positive perihilar cholangiocarcinoma were included. The patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy were divided into the S-1 and GEM groups according to the regimen. The recurrence-free survival (RFS) and the overall survival (OS) were compared between the groups and adjusted with propensity scores generated from 14 potentially confounding clinicopathological factors. RESULTS: In total, 186 patients (Surgery alone, n = 71; S-1, n = 60; GEM, n = 55) were included. The S-1 and GEM completion rates were 75% and 65%, respectively. Among the patients who underwent adjuvant therapy, the RFS was longer in the S-1 group patients than the GEM group patients (median, 24.4 months vs 14.9 months; P = .044) whereas the OS was not significantly different between the groups (median, 48.5 months vs 35.0 months; P = .324). After propensity score adjustment, the differences in RFS and OS between the groups were more evident (HR: 2.696, 95% CI: 1.739-4.180 P < .001; HR: 1.988, 95% CI: 1.221-3.238, P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with adjuvant GEM monotherapy, adjuvant S-1 monotherapy may improve survival in node-positive perihilar cholangiocarcinoma patients.

Long-term results of ERCP- or PTCS-directed photodynamic therapy for unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Photodynamic therapy (PDT) can be performed as palliative therapy for cholangiocarcinoma, while there is currently insufficient evidence for the efficacy. The aim of this study was to explore the clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)- or percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy (PTCS)-directed PDT combined with stent placement for unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 62 patients with unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Thirty patients received PDT using hematoporphyrin combined with biliary stent placement (PDT+stent group), including 22 receiving ERCP-directed PDT and 8 receiving PTCS-directed PDT. Survival time, quality of life, and postoperative adverse events were compared to 32 patients receiving biliary stent placement alone (Stent-only group). RESULTS: After 42 months of follow-up, median survival time was significantly longer in the PDT+stent group than the Stent-only group (14.2 vs. 9.8 months, P = 0.003). In the PDT+stent group, the median survival time was longer in the 6 patients with recurrence after surgical resection than the 24 patients without prior surgical resection (20.0 vs. 13.0 months, P = 0.017). The QOL total scores was significantly higher in the PDT+stent group than the Stent-only group at postoperative 6, 9, and 12 months (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative adverse events between the two groups (24 [38.7%] vs. 20 [29.0%], P = 0.239). CONCLUSION: ERCP- or PTCS-directed PDT + stent placement can prolong the survival of patients with unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma, especially those with recurrence and improve quality of life without increasing adverse events.

Efficacy and safety of systemic induction therapy in initially unresectable locally advanced intrahepatic and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: According to international guidelines, induction therapy may be considered in selected patients with initially unresectable locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma. The criteria for (un)resectability in cholangiocarcinoma varies between studies and no consensus-based agreement is available about these criteria. By performing a systematic literature review, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of systemic induction therapy in initially unresectable locally advanced perihilar (pCCA) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) and summarize resectability criteria used across studies. METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane library to identify studies on systemic induction therapy in locally advanced pCCA and/or iCCA. The primary outcome was resection rate (RR) after induction therapy and secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Ten studies with a total of 1167 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Among these patients, 334 (28.6%) were treated with systemic induction therapy. Across the studies, different types of chemotherapy regimens were administered (e.g., gemcitabine (based) chemotherapy and 5-FU (based) chemotherapy). Only six studies provided sufficient data and were used to analyze pooled (radical) resection rates. After induction therapy, 94 patients (39.2%) underwent a resection, of which R0 resections (22.9%). Pooled data on OS showed, better OS for chemotherapy plus resection versus chemotherapy only (pooled HR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.19-0.50; P value < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Adequately selected patients with locally advanced pCCA or iCCA may benefit from induction therapy followed by surgical resection. Prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted.

Klatskin tumor diagnosed concurrently with IgG4 related sclerosing cholangitis: A case report.

RATIONALE: IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a systemic disease that can involve various organs and is characterized by the infiltrations of IgG4-positive plasma cells and lymphocytes, fibrosis, and elevated serum IgG4 levels. IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis (IgG4-RSC) is a subtype of IgG4-RD. No certain relationship between IgG4-RSC and cholangiocarcinoma has been established as yet, and there have been few reports of the simultaneous diagnosis of IgG4-RSC and cholangiocarcinoma. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 76-year-old male visited our gastroenterology department due to the recent occurrence of pruritus and jaundice. DIAGNOSIS: Computed tomography (CT) scan showed ductal wall swelling and enhancement from both intrahepatic duct confluence to the common bile duct, upper biliary dilatation, and accompanying autoimmune pancreatitis (a sub type of IgG4-RD). Biopsy of the distal common bile duct by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) resulted in a diagnosis of IgG4-RSC. Subsequently, adenocarcinoma was identified by repeated cytology of bile juice. Finally, Klatskin tumor type IIIA and IgG4-RSC were concurrently diagnosed. INTERVENTIONS: IgG4-RSC was treated with steroid and Klatskin tumors by gemcitabine + cisplatin chemotherapy. OUTCOMES: The jaundice had improved and CT showed substantial improvement of the intrahepatic duct dilatation. LESSONS: IgG4-RSC and cholangiocarcinoma are easily confused, but their treatments are quite different, and thus, care must be taken during diagnosis. Furthermore, these 2 diseases may co-exist. Therefore, even if IgG4-RSC is diagnosed first, the possibility of accompanying cholangiocarcinoma should be thoroughly investigated.

The placement of multiple plastic stents still has important roles in candidates for chemotherapy for unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Placement of uncovered self-expandable metallic stents (U-SEMSs) of patients with unresectable perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (UPHC) is recommended as the treatment of first choice to address bile stasis. The aim of this study was to determine which of the following two endoscopic stents might be the stent of first choice for the treatment of biliary stasis in patients with UPHC: plastic stents (PSs) or U-SEMSs. METHODS: U-SEMSs, deployed as a stent-in-stent, were selected as the stents of first choice from 2013 and 2014, while PSs began to be selected as the stents of first choice from 2015 onward. RESULTS: The median time to recurrent biliary obstruction were 66 days in the PS group (N = 38) and 105 days in the U-SEMS group (N = 37; P = .04). Emergency endoscopy was necessitated in 76.3% (29/38) of patients of the PS group and 54.1% (20/37) of patients of the U-SEMS group (P = .0434). The success rate of the first reintervention was 96.5% (27/29) in the PS group and 55% (11/20) in the U-SEMS group (P = .0002). Sustainable chemotherapy could be carried out in 55.2% of patients in the PS group and 32.4% of patients in the U-SEMS group (P = .0472). Multivariate analysis identified selection of U-SEMS as the stent of first choice as the only independent factor predictive of successful reintervention (P = .0016, odds ratio = 0.058). However, the stent selection was not an independent factor for feasible chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Plastic stent placement could enhance the success rate of reintervention in patients with UPHC and might be facilitated by sustainable chemotherapy. However, stent selection might not have an influence on the prognosis.

Clinical impact of irreversible electroporation ablation for unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a non-thermal ablation modality that has been shown to be safe and effective in its application to tumors that are close to risky areas. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of IRE for unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Nine patients from two medical centers in Asia received IRE treatment between June 2015 and July 2017. Before IRE treatment, percutaneous biliary decompressions had been performed on eight patients, and internal stenting had been performed on one patient. All patients tolerated the procedure well without high-grade complications. The ablated tumors had constant size without contrast enhancement for more than three months in eight patients and the level of CA19-9 decreased significantly in all patients. The percutaneous biliary drainage tube was removed from two patients with recanalization of the bile duct. The internal stent in one patient was removed without further stenting. The median overall survival period was 26 months, and the progression-free survival was 18 months. Bile ducts remained narrow in the majority (2/3) of the treated patients. Nevertheless, IRE ablation of unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma involving vital structures is a safe and feasible primary treatment for local tumor control and is effective in prolonging survival.

Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin Chemotherapy Prolongs the Survival in Advanced Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: A Large Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVES: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) is recommended as first-line treatment for advanced cholangiocarcinoma. We investigated the impact of GC in patients with unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC) based on the time taken for effective biliary drainage (EBD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 113 patients with unresectable HC. Thirty-nine and 74 patients received GC chemotherapy and best supportive care (BSC), respectively. EBD was defined as a reduction in total bilirubin >50% or to a value <2 mg/dL after the drainage procedure. Early EBD (eEBD) and delayed EBD (dEBD) were separated by 2 weeks. Overall survival (OS) was estimated. RESULTS: The GC group showed a significantly longer median OS than the BSC group (12.8 vs. 6.1 mo; P<0.001). Moreover, the eEBD group experienced a significantly longer OS than the dEBD group (8.2 vs. 4.3 mo; P<0.001). GC led to improved OS in the eEBD (12.8 vs. 6.8 mo; P=0.003) and dEBD (12.2 vs. 3.4 mo; P=0.009) groups. In multivariate analysis, dEBD (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.785; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.183-2.691; P=0.006), BSC (aHR, 2.409; 95% CI, 1.579-3.675; P<0.001), and an ECOG status ≥2 (aHR, 3.721; 95% CI, 2.093-6.615; P<0.001) were associated with poor prognosis. In GC group, the older (70 y and above) patients did not have a higher risk of death than younger patients. CONCLUSIONS: GC prolongs the survival of patients with unresectable HC, even those with dEBD or elderly.

[Long-Term Survival after Surgery with Postoperative Chemotherapy for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma with Residual Invasive Carcinoma at Ductal Resection Margins-A Case Report].

A 64-year-old man with liver dysfunction was given a diagnosis of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma(Bismuth type Ⅳ). The tumor was predominantly right-sided and invaded to the bifurcation of the right and left portal veins. After confirming sufficient liver functional reserve and future liver remnant, the patient underwent extended right hepatectomy, extrahepatic bile duct resection, and portal vein resection and reconstruction. Intraoperative examination of frozen sections revealed the presence of residual invasive carcinoma on both the hepatic and duodenal sides of the ductal resection margins. However, we did not perform pancreaticoduodenectomy or additional resection of the margin-positive proximal bile duct considering the curability and invasiveness of these procedures. He received postoperative chemotherapy with biweekly gemcitabine plus cisplatin for 1 year, followed by gemcitabine monotherapy for 1 year, and S-1 monotherapy has been performed since then. He remains alive and well with no evidence of disease 63 months after surgery.

[Successful R0 Resection of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma by Extrahepatic Bile Duct Resection Due to Accompanying Liver Dysfunction after Neoadjuvant Gemcitabine/Cisplatin/S-1 Combination Chemotherapy-A Case Report].

A 79-year-old man was referred to our hospital for treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with pathological evidence. FDG-PET/CT and EUS-FNA revealed regional lymph node metastasis and no distant metastasis before the treatment. He received 6 courses of neoadjuvant gemcitabine/cisplatin/S-1 combination chemotherapy, and the imaging studies revealed partial response. However, due to impairment of the liver after chemotherapy, it was difficult to perform subsequent major hepatectomy, and we decided to continue the chemotherapy. The impairment of the liver did not recover following 11 courses of chemotherapy; on the other hand, FDG uptake was diminished on FDG-PET, and cancer cells were not detected by repeated cytology and biopsy. Extrahepatic bile duct resection with dissection of regional lymph nodes was performed, and histopathological examinationof the resected specimensuggested R0 resection.