Evaluating nomogram models for predicting survival outcomes in gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors with SEER database analysis.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) predominantly develop in the stomach. While nomogram offer tremendous therapeutic promise, there is yet no ideal nomogram comparison customized specifically for handling categorical data and model selection related gastric GISTs. (1) We selected 5463 patients with gastric GISTs from the SEER Research Plus database spanning from 2000 to 2020; (2) We proposed an advanced missing data imputation algorithm specifically designed for categorical variables; (3) We constructed five Cox nomogram models, each employing distinct methods for the selection and modeling of categorical variables, including Cox (Two-Stage), Lasso-Cox, Ridge-Cox, Elastic Net-Cox, and Cox With Lasso; (4) We conducted a comprehensive comparison of both overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) tasks at six different time points; (5) To ensure robustness, we performed 50 randomized splits for each task, maintaining a 7:3 ratio between the training and test cohorts with no discernible statistical differences. Among the five models, the Cox (Two-Stage) nomogram contains the fewest features. Notably, at Near-term, Mid-term, and Long-term intervals, the Cox (Two-Stage) model attains the highest Area Under the Curve (AUC), top-1 ratio, and top-3 ratio in both OS and CSS tasks. For the prediction of survival in patients with gastric GISTs, the Cox (Two-Stage) nomogram stands as a simple, stable, and accurate predictive model with substantial promise for clinical application. To enhance the clinical utility and accessibility of our findings, we have deployed the nomogram model online, allowing healthcare professionals and researchers worldwide to access and utilize this predictive tool.

Feasibility of laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor with tumor diameter of >5 cm.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) is an effective treatment for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The utility of LECS for gastric GISTs of > 5 cm remains controversial. This study was performed to investigate the feasibility of LECS for gastric GISTs with a tumor diameter of >5 cm. METHODS: We analyzed 43 patients with gastric GISTs who underwent LECS or laparoscopic partial gastrectomy (Lap-Partial Gx). We compared the surgical outcomes of LECS versus Lap-Partial Gx and of LECS for a tumor diameter of > 5 versus ≤ 5 cm. RESULTS: In the comparison of LECS versus Lap-Partial Gx, there were no significant intergroup differences in the operative time or blood loss volume. The morbidity rate was similar between the groups. No postoperative mortality occurred in either group. In the comparison of LECS for a tumor diameter of > 5 versus ≤ 5 cm, there were no significant intergroup differences in operative time, or blood loss volume. The morbidity rate was similar between the > 5-cm and ≤ 5-cm groups (0.0% vs. 4.5%, respectively ; p = 0.56). Additionally, no recurrence or death occurred during follow-up in either group. CONCLUSION: LECS is a feasible option for gastric GISTs with a tumor diameter of > 5 cm. J. Med. Invest. 71 : 148-153, February, 2024.

Non-gastrointestinal stromal tumor, mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract: a review of tumor genetics, pathology, and cross-sectional imaging findings.

There is a diverse group of non-gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), mesenchymal neoplasms of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract that demonstrate characteristic pathology and histogenesis as well as variable imaging findings and biological behavior. Recent advancements in tumor genetics have unveiled specific abnormalities associated with certain tumors, influencing their molecular pathogenesis, biology, response to treatment, and prognosis. Notably, giant fibrovascular polyps of the esophagus, identified through MDM2 gene amplifications, are now classified as liposarcomas. Some tumors exhibit distinctive patterns of disease distribution. Glomus tumors and plexiform fibromyxomas exhibit a pronounced affinity for the gastric antrum. In contrast, smooth muscle tumors within the GI tract are predominantly found in the esophagus and colorectum, surpassing the incidence of GISTs in these locations. Surgical resection suffices for symptomatic benign tumors; multimodality treatment may be necessary for frank sarcomas. This article aims to elucidate the cross-sectional imaging findings associated with a wide spectrum of these tumors, providing insights that align with their histopathological features.

A Unique Case of Mesenteric Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Presenting as an Acute Abdomen.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors in the digestive tract and arise from the interstitial cells of Cajal in the mesenteric plexus. These tumors can originate in any part of the GI tract; however, a higher burden has been observed in the stomach and small intestines. Mesenteric GISTs are exceedingly rare, with unique clinicopathological features and a poorer prognosis. Herein, we describe a unique case of a 66-year-old female with a remote history of appendectomy who presented to the emergency room complaining of severe abdominal pain and vomiting. On imaging, the patient was found to have a large inflammatory mass associated with small bowel loops, and the pathology confirmed a mesenteric GIST. The tumor was resected, and the genomic test results confirmed the KIT (exon 11) mutation. Although the tumor had a low mitotic rate, the tumor was large enough to warrant the initiation of adjuvant imatinib mesylate for 36 months with regular bloodwork and imaging.

Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with oligometastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour who are in complete radiological remission: a prospective multicentre phase II study.

INTRODUCTION: Metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) is considered incurable, and life-long treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors is recommended. We investigated whether selected patients with metastatic GIST may remain in durable remission despite imatinib discontinuation. PATIENTS: In this 1-group, prospective, multicentre phase II trial selected patients with oligometastatic (≤3 metastases) GIST discontinued imatinib treatment. Eligible patients had been treated with imatinib >5 years without progression and had no radiologically detectable metastases after metastasectomy, radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or complete response to imatinib. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) 3-years after stopping imatinib. Overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL) were secondary endpoints. RESULTS: The trial closed prematurely due to slow accrual. Between January 5, 2017, and June 5, 2019, 13 patients were enrolled, of whom 12 discontinued imatinib. The median follow-up time was 55 months (range, 36 to 69) after study entry. Five (42%) of the 12 eligible patients remained progression free, and seven (58%) progressed with a median time to progression 10 months. Median PFS was 23 months and the estimated 3-year PFS 41%. Six of the seven patients who progressed restarted imatinib, and all six responded. Three-year OS was 100%, and all patients were alive at the time of the study analysis. QoL measured 5 and 11 months after discontinuation of imatinib demonstrated improvement compared to the baseline. INTERPRETATION: A substantial proportion of selected patients with oligometastatic GIST treated with imatinib and metastasis surgery/RFA may remain disease-free for ≥3 years with improved QoL after stopping of imatinib.

A rare clinical case of extra-gastrointestinal stromal pancreatic tumor.

Extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumors arising from the pancreas are extremely rare. To date, just over 30 cases have been described in the world literature. A clinical observation of a 67-year-old patient with dull epigastric pain and a large cystic solid neoplasm instrumentally identified as an extra-gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the head of the pancreas is presented. The volume of surgical intervention consisted of pancreatogastroduodenectomy and right-sided hemicolectomy, since tumor invasion into the transverse mesocolon was detected intraoperatively. The final diagnosis of extra-gastrointestinal stromal sarcoma of the head of the pancreas with invasion into the mesocolon pT4N0M0, stage IIIb was made on the basis of histopathology and immunohistochemistry results.

[A Case of a Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor of the Stomach with Lymph Node Metastasis].

A 87-year-old female was pointed out wall thickness in the upper part of gastric body for examination of anemia. The mass had a contrast effect, some of it protruded outside the wall, and the surrounding lymph nodes were enlarged. Upper endoscopy showed irregular ulcerative lesion with submucosal volume from posterior wall to the greater curvature in the upper part of gastric body. Biopsy was performed, and GIST of stomach was diagnosed. Surgery was performed for the GIST of the stomach. During open surgery, invasion of pancreatic tail was observed, therefore proximal gastrectomy with D1 lymph node dissection and distal pancreatectomy were performed. Pathologically, the tumor measured 95×78×65 mm with mitotic figures(38/50 high-power fields). Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that tumor cells expressed positive results for c-kit, α-SMA and CD34, and negative results for S-100 and desmin on the basis of the histology and immunostaining profile, the tumor was diagnosed as a GIST. The patient was classed as high risk according to Fletcher's risk classification. Tumor invades pancreatic tail, and lymph node metastasis was observed. She was discharged on the postoperative day 27 and alive without tumor recurrence at 6 months after surgery, not undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy.

The long-term efficacy of imatinib with hepatic resection or other local treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumours liver metastases: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The liver is the most common site of metastasis from gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The authors aimed to evaluate imatinib (IM) combined with hepatic resection (HR) or other local treatments such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), compared to IM monotherapy in long-term survival benefits in patients suffering from GIST liver metastases. METHODS: Our research encompassed 238 patients diagnosed with liver metastases of GISTs from January 2002 to April 2022 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University. The oncological outcomes of concern included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and liver-specific PFS. RESULTS: Of all 238 patients, 126 were treated with IM alone (IM group), 81 with IM combined with HR (IM+HR group), and 31 with IM combined with RFA/TACE (IM+RFA/TACE group). The median follow-up time was 44.83 months. The median OS in the IM group was 132.60 months and was not reached in either the IM+HR group or the IM+RFA/TACE group. The 10-year OS rate in the IM+HR group was significantly superior to the IM group and the IM+RFA/TACE group (91.9% vs. 61.1% vs. 55.2%, respectively, P =0.015), and the liver-specific PFS ( P =0.642) and PFS ( P =0.369) in the three groups showed a beneficial trend in the combined treatment group. Multivariate analyses showed that age less than or equal to 60 years (HR 0.280, P< 0.001) and IM+HR (HR 0.361, P =0.047) were independently associated with better OS. Achieving no evidence of disease through surgical intervention was independently correlated with enhanced OS (HR 0.099, P =0.034), liver-specific PFS (HR 0.388, P =0.014), and PFS (HR 0.402, P =0.004). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with GIST liver metastases, IM combined with HR might improve OS in selected patients compared with IM alone and IM combined with RFA/TACE. Achieving no evidence of disease status with surgical treatment of patients results in significant prolonging of OS, liver-specific PFS, and PFS.

[Gastrointestinal stromal tumors : Where do we stand?] / Gastrointestinale Stromatumoren : Wo stehen wir?

For more than 20 years gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) have been a paradigm for a targeted treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors. A fundamental prerequisite for a neoadjuvant or adjuvant treatment of localized GIST or an additive treatment of metastatic GIST is the molecular typing of tumors, ideally at the initial diagnosis. In addition, the possibility of a hereditary or syndromic predisposition must be considered because this results in consequences for the treatment and a different follow-up strategy.

Jejunojejunal intussusception induced by a gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a case report and literature review.

Intussusception is defined as the invagination of a proximal segment of the bowel into the adjoining or distal segment. In most adults with intussusception, there is a demonstrable lead point with a definite pathologic abnormality. The clinical features of intussusception include chronic intermittent abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting, constipation, and a palpable abdominal mass. The present case report describes a 62-year-old woman with a 2-week history of abdominal pain and 9-day history of vomiting. Clinical, imaging, and histologic evaluations revealed a jejunojejunal intussusception with a gastrointestinal stromal tumor as the lead point. A gastrointestinal stromal tumor should be considered as a possible lead point in adult patients with intussusception. The implication of reducing the intussusception prior to tumor resection requires further evaluation in view of the risk of venous embolism, including direct spread of malignant cells, in cases involving a large polypoid mass with a necrotic surface that extends to the serosa as shown by intraoperative examination. Accordingly, the rationale for adjuvant therapy with imatinib also requires further evaluation.

Feasibility and efficacy of minimally invasive limited resection for primary duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The primary duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare type of gastrointestinal tract tumor. Limited resection (LR) has been increasingly performed for duodenal GIST. However, only a few studies reported minimally invasive limited resection (MI-LR) for primary duodenal GIST. METHODS: The clinical data of 33 patients with primary duodenal GIST from December 2014 to February 2024 were retrospectively analyzed including 23 who received MI-LR and 10 who received laparoscopic or robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD/RPD). RESULTS: A total of 33 patients with primary duodenal GIST were enrolled and retrospectively reviewed. Patients received MI-LR exhibited less OT (280 vs. 388.5min, P=0.004), EBL (100 vs. 450ml, P<0.001), and lower morbidity of postoperative complications (52.2% vs. 100%, P=0.013) than LPD/RPD. Patients received LPD/RPD burdened more aggressive tumors with larger size (P=0.047), higher classification (P<0.001), and more mitotic count/50 HPF(P=0.005) compared with patients received MI-LR. The oncological outcomes were similar in MI-LR group and LPD/RPD group. All the patients underwent MI-LR with no conversion, including 12 cases of LLR and 11 cases of RLR. All of the clinicopathological data of the patients were similar in both groups. The median OT was 280(210-480) min and 257(180-450) min, and the median EBL was 100(20-1000) mL and 100(20-200) mL in the LLR and the RLR group separately. The postoperative complications mainly included DGE (LLR 4 cases, 33.4% and RLR 4 cases, 36.4%), intestinal fistula (LLR 2 cases, 16.7%, and RLR 0 case), gastrointestinal hemorrhage (LLR 0 case and RLR 1 case, 9.1%), and intra-abdominal infection (LLR 3 cases, 25.0% and RLR 1 case, 9.1%). The median postoperative length of hospitalization was 19.5(7-46) days in the LLR group and 19(9-38) days in the RLR group. No anastomotic stenosis, local recurrence or distant metastasis was observed during the follow-up period in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive limited resection is an optional treatment for primary duodenal GIST with satisfactory short-term and long-term oncological outcomes.

Expression of TGF-ß1 in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) and the Occurrence of Frequent Desmoplasia.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are mesenchymal neoplasms with variable behavior characterized by differentiation toward the interstitial cells of Cajal occurring anywhere in the gastrointestinal stromal tract. Frequently, GISTs have fibrous stroma within tumor cell proliferation areas, which is unlike other types of malignant tumors. If this desmoplasia is active, there is a possibility that some sort of transmitter exists between GIST cells and cells related to fibrosis in the tumor cell proliferation areas. Transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß isoforms, particularly TGF-ß1, are critical for fibrosis pathogenesis. TGF-ß1 regulation of myofibroblasts and fibroblasts during fibrosis is well described. The induced fibroblast activation resulting in myofibroblast differentiation has been reported as an important source of collagen, glycoproteins, proteoglycans, and matrix metallopeptidases in wound healing and fibrosis. However, there are a few reports on the relationship between TGF-ß1 and GISTs. This study aims to clarify TGF-ß1 expression in 30 gastric GISTs using immunohistochemistry and reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). For comparison, we also enrolled 30 samples of gastric tubular adenocarcinoma (GTAC). We confirmed TGF-ß1 expression (H-score ≥50 points) in 57% of GIST and 13% of GTAC samples, a significant difference between the 2 tumor types ( P =0.001). We examined the TGF-ß1 mRNA expression of 3 representative GIST samples, each having their respective immunostained areas detected by RT-PCR. Finding TGF-ß1 expression may indicate that this cytokine plays a part in the formation of desmoplasia within GIST cell proliferative areas.

Robot-assisted distal gastrectomy and local resection for gastric cancer and gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors surrounding the esophagogastric junction are often challenging to resect, with no consensus regarding the optimal surgical technique. Here in, we present a case of concurrent gastric cancer in the antrum and gastrointestinal stromal tumors adjacent to the esophagogastric junction. The patient underwent simultaneous distal gastrectomy and local resection assisted by a surgical robot, avoiding the need for total gastrectomy. The utilization of robot-assisted surgery has become an increasingly popular technique, holding promise for simplifying complex surgical procedures across diverse medical settings.

Comparative Analysis of Enbloc or Piecemeal Removal After Enbloc Resection of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety and prognosis of enbloc or piecemeal removal after enbloc resection of a gastric GIST by comparing the clinical data of endoscopic en block resection and piecemeal removal (EP) and en block resection and complete removal (EC) of gastric GISTs. METHODS: A total of 111 (43 endoscopic piecemeal, and 68 complete removal) patients with gastric GIST's ≥ 2 cm in diameter who underwent endoscopic therapy from January 2016 to June 2020 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were retrospectively analyzed. In all cases, it was ensured that the tumor was intact during the resection, however, it was divided into EP group and EC group based on whether the tumor was completely removed or was cut into pieces which were then removed. The patients' recurrence-free survival rate and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were recorded. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in RFS rates between the two groups (P = 0.197). The EP group had relatively high patient age, tumor diameter, risk classification, and operation time. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of nuclear fission images, postoperative hospitalization time, postoperative fasting time, complication rate and complication grading between the two groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic piecemeal removal after en block resection of gastric GIST is safe and effective and achieves similar clinical outcomes as complete removal after en block resection.

A nomogram for predicting liver metastasis in patients with gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

BACKGROUND: Liver metastasis (LIM) is an important factor in the diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and prognosis of patients with gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). There is no simple tool to assess the risk of LIM in patients with gastric GIST. Our aim was to develop and validate a nomogram to identify patients with gastric GIST at high risk of LIM. METHODS: Patient data diagnosed as having gastric GIST between 2010 and 2019 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and randomly divided into training cohort and internal validation cohort in a 7:3 ratio. For external validation, retrospective data collection was performed on patients diagnosed as having gastric GIST at Yunnan Cancer Center (YNCC) between January 2015 and May 2023. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors associated with LIM in patients with gastric GIST. An individualized LIM nomogram specific for gastric GIST was formulated based on the multivariate logistic model; its discriminative performance, calibration, and clinical utility were evaluated. RESULTS: In the SEER database, a cohort of 2341 patients with gastric GIST was analyzed, of which 173 cases (7.39%) were found to have LIM; 239 patients with gastric GIST from the YNCC database were included, of which 25 (10.46%) had LIM. Multivariate analysis showed tumor size, tumor site, and sex were independent risk factors for LIM (P < .05). The nomogram based on the basic clinical characteristics of tumor size, tumor site, sex, and age demonstrated significant discrimination, with an area under the curve of 0.753 (95% CI, 0.692-0.814) and 0.836 (95% CI, 0.743-0.930) in the internal and external validation cohort, respectively. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test showed that the nomogram was well calibrated, whereas the decision curve analysis and the clinical impact plot demonstrated its clinical utility. CONCLUSION: Tumor size, tumor subsite, and sex were significantly correlated with the risk of LIM in gastric GIST. The nomogram for patients with GIST can effectively predict the individualized risk of LIM and contribute to the planning and decision making related to metastasis management in clinical practice.

Clinical features and prognosis of malignant small bowel tumors: Experience from a university hospital in Chile.

BACKGROUND: Small bowel tumors (SBT) are infrequent and represent a small proportion of digestive neoplasms. There is scarce information about SBT in Latin America. AIM: To describe the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, diagnostic methods, and survival of malignant SBTs. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of adult patients with histopathological diagnosis of SBT between 2007 and 2021 in a university hospital in Chile. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients [51.9% men; mean age 57 years] with SBT. Histological type: neuroendocrine tumor (NET) (43.7%, n=38), gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) (21.8%, n=19), lymphoma (17.2%, n=15) and adenocarcinoma (AC) (11.5%, n=10). GIST was more frequent in duodenum (50%; n=12) and NET in the ileum (65.8%; n=25). Metastasis was observed in 17 cases, most commonly from colon and melanoma. Nausea and vomiting were significantly more often observed in AC (p=0.035), as well as gastrointestinal bleeding in GIST (p=0.007). The most common diagnostic tools were CT and CT enteroclysis with an elevated diagnostic yield (86% and 94% respectively). The 5-year survival of GIST, NET, lymphoma and AC were 94.7% (95%CI: 68.1-99.2), 82.2% (95%CI: 57.6-93.3), 40.0% (95%CI: 16.5-82.8) and 25.9% (95%CI: 4.5-55.7%), respectively. NET (HR 6.1; 95%CI: 2.1-17.2) and GIST (HR 24.4; 95%CI: 3.0-19.8) were independently associated with higher survival compared to AC, adjusted for age and sex. CONCLUSIONS: Malignant SBT are rare conditions and NETs are the most common histological subtype. Clinical presentation at diagnosis, location or complications may suggest a more probable diagnosis. GIST and NET are associated with better survival compared to other malignant subtypes.

Development and validation of a preoperative risk nomogram prediction model for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) carry a potential risk of malignancy, and the treatment of GIST varies for different risk levels. However, there is no systematic preoperative assessment protocol to predict the malignant potential of GIST. The aim of this study was to develop a reliable and clinically applicable preoperative nomogram prediction model to predict the malignant potential of gastric GIST. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with a pathological diagnosis of gastric GIST from January 2015 to December 2021 were screened retrospectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for gastric GIST with high malignancy potential. Based on these independent risk factors, a nomogram model predicting the malignant potential of gastric GIST was developed and the model was validated in the validation group. RESULTS: A total of 494 gastric GIST patients were included in this study and allocated to a development group (n = 345) and a validation group (n = 149). In the development group, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that tumor size, tumor ulceration, CT growth pattern and monocyte-to- lymphocyte ratio (MLR) were independent risk factors for gastric GIST with high malignancy potential. The AUC of the model were 0.932 (95% CI 0.890-0.974) and 0.922 (95% CI 0.868-0.977) in the development and validation groups, respectively. The best cutoff value for the development group was 0.184, and the sensitivity and specificity at this value were 0.895 and 0.875, respectively. The calibration curves indicated good agreement between predicted and actual observed outcomes, while the DCA indicated that the nomogram model had clinical application. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor size, tumor ulceration, CT growth pattern and MLR are independent risk factors for high malignancy potential gastric GIST, and a nomogram model developed based on these factors has a high ability to predict the malignant potential of gastric GIST.

Transumbilical Endoscopic Resection of Intra-abdominal Mesenchymal Tumor.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) typically occur in the stomach and proximal small intestine but can also be found in any other part of the digestive tract, including the abdominal cavity, albeit rarely. In the present case, the tumor was resected endoscopically through the anterior gastric wall. Computed tomography (CT) scan and gastroscopy of a 60-year-old woman revealed submucosal lesions in the gastric body. The possibility of a stromal tumor was considered more likely. The endoscopic surgery was performed under endotracheal anesthesia. After a solution had been injected at the lesion site in the stomach, the entire gastric wall was dissected to expose the tumor. As the lesion was in the abdominal cavity and its base was attached to the abdominal wall, it was accessed using a sterilized PCF colonoscope. A sodium chloride injection was administered at the base. The tumor was then peeled along its boundaries using the hooking and excision knife combined with the precutting knife. Subsequently, the tumor was pulled into the stomach through the incision made in the stomach and then extracted externally through the upper digestive tract using the ERCP spiral mesh basket. After confirming the absence of bleeding at the incision site, the endoscope was returned to the stomach, and the stomach opening was closed using purse-string sutures. The patient recovered satisfactorily following the surgery and was discharged on day 4. Histological examination revealed a low-risk stromal tumor (spindle cell type, <5 mitosis/50 high-power fields [HPF]). Immunohistochemistry revealed positive staining for CD34 and CD117, negative staining for SMA, positive staining for DOG1, and negative staining for S100. Additionally, the expression of ki67 was 3%.