Open-label study of long-term administration of dotinurad in Japanese hyperuricemic patients with or without gout.

BACKGROUND: Dotinurad is a novel selective urate reabsorption inhibitor (SURI) which reduces serum uric acid levels by selectively inhibiting urate transporter 1 (URAT1). This study was intended to verify the efficacy and safety of dotinurad following treatment for 34 or 58 weeks in hyperuricemic patients with or without gout. METHODS: This long-term study had an open-label design with dose escalation. The dose of dotinurad started at 0.5 mg/day and was increased progressively to 2 mg/day. If the serum uric acid level of patients did not reach ≤ 6 mg/dL at week 14, the dose was increased to 4 mg/day. The primary endpoint was the percent change in serum uric acid level from the baseline to each visit. RESULTS: At a dose of 2 mg, serum uric acid levels at week 34 and 58 were reduced from the baseline by 46.73% and 47.17%, respectively; at 4 mg, the respective values were 54.92% and 57.35%. At week 34 and 58, the percentages of patients achieving a serum uric acid levels ≤ 6.0 mg/dL with 2-mg dose were 89.11% and 91.30%, respectively; with 4 mg, the respective rates were 97.50% and 100.00%. In addition, the incidences of adverse events and adverse drug reactions were 65.2% and 21.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Dotinurad at doses of 2-4-mg sufficiently reduced serum uric acid levels in hyperuricemic patients with or without gout, and its efficacy and safety were verified for long-term administration. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03006445.

URC102, a potent and selective inhibitor of hURAT1, reduced serum uric acid in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: URC102, a novel and potent inhibitor of human uric acid transporter 1 (hURAT1), is currently under clinical development to treat patients with gout. We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase I study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacokinetic profiles of URC102 after single and multiple oral administration in healthy male subjects. METHODS: Thirty-one Koreans and 23 Caucasians received a single dose of URC102 at 1-30 mg and 1-10 mg, respectively, while 44 Koreans received URC102 once-daily for 7 days at 1-20 mg. We evaluated safety and tolerability throughout the study, and serially determined serum uric acid, the fractional excretion of uric acid and URC102 concentrations. RESULTS: URC102 was well tolerated over the dose range of 1-10 mg after single and multiple administration. URC102 rapidly reduced serum uric acid, which was maintained over the entire treatment period. Furthermore, URC102 increased the area-under-the-effect curve over 168 h for fractional excretion of uric acid in a dose-dependent manner. The maximum plasma concentration and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of URC102 increased dose-proportionally. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics characteristics of URC102 were similar in Koreans and Caucasians. CONCLUSION: URC102 was safe and effectively lowered serum uric acid, which should be tested and confirmed in patients with hyperuricaemia and/or gout through further studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01953497 and NCT02524678.

Verinurad combined with febuxostat in Japanese adults with gout or asymptomatic hyperuricaemia: a phase 2a, open-label study.

Objectives: Verinurad (RDEA3170) is a high-affinity inhibitor of the URAT1 transporter in clinical development for treating gout and asymptomatic hyperuricaemia. The aim of this Phase 2a, randomized, open-label study was to investigate the multiple-dose pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and safety of oral verinurad combined with febuxostat vs febuxostat alone and verinurad alone. Methods: Japanese male subjects aged 21-65 years with gout (n = 37) or asymptomatic hyperuricaemia (n = 35) and serum urate (sUA) ⩾8 mg/dl were randomized to febuxostat (10, 20, 40 mg) in combination with verinurad (2.5-10 mg), verinurad alone (2.5-15 mg), febuxostat alone (10, 20, 40 mg) or benzbromarone alone (50 mg). There were four treatment periods per cohort and each treatment period was 7 days. Study drugs were administered once-daily after breakfast. Plasma, serum and urine samples were measured at pre-set intervals on days -1, 7, 14, 21 and 28. Results: Verinurad combined with febuxostat decreased sUA in dose-dependent manner, providing greater sUA lowering than febuxostat alone at the same dose (P < 0.001). Urinary uric acid excretion rate was increased by verinurad, reduced by febuxostat and comparable to baseline for verinurad combined with febuxostat. Verinurad from 2.5 mg to 15 mg was well tolerated, with no withdrawals due to adverse events. Laboratory assessments showed no clinically meaningful changes during combination treatment. Conclusion: Verinurad combined with febuxostat decreased sUA dose-dependently while maintaining uric acid excretion similar to baseline. All dose combinations of verinurad and febuxostat were generally well tolerated. These data support continued investigation of oral verinurad in patients with gout. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, https://clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02317861.

Individualized treatment strategies for hyperuricemia informed by a semi-mechanistic exposure-response model of uric acid dynamics.

To provide insight into pharmacological treatment of hyperuricemia we developed a semi-mechanistic, dynamical model of uric acid (UA) disposition in human. Our model represents the hyperuricemic state in terms of production of UA (rate, PUA), its renal filtration (glomerular filtration rate, GFR) and proximal tubular reabsorption (fractional excretion coefficient, FE). Model parameters were estimated using data from 9 Phase I studies of xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOI) allopurinol and febuxostat and a novel uricosuric, the selective UA reabsorption inhibitor lesinurad, approved for use in combination with a XOI. The model was qualified for prediction of the effect of patients' GFR and FE on concentration of UA in serum (sUA) and UA excretion in urine and their response to drug treatment, using data from 2 Phase I and 4 Phase III studies of lesinurad. Percent reduction in sUA from baseline by a XOI is predicted to be independent of GFR, FE or PUA. Uricosurics are more effective in underexcreters of UA or patients with normal GFR. Co-administration of a XOI and an uricosuric agent should be considered for patients with high sUA first in the treatment algorithm of gout before uptitration of XOI. The XOI dose in combination with a uricosuric can be reduced compared to XOI alone for the same target sUA to the degree dependent on patient's GFR and FE. This exposure-response model of UA can be used to rationally select the best drug treatment option to lower elevated sUA in gout patients under differing pathophysiological situations.

Lesinurad: A Review in Hyperuricaemia of Gout.

Lesinurad (Zurampic®) is an oral selective inhibitor of the URAT1 and OAT4 uric acid (UA) transporters of the kidney, via which it inhibits UA reabsorption and thus increases renal UA excretion and lowers serum UA (sUA) levels. Lesinurad 200 mg once daily is indicated for use in combination with a xanthine oxidase inhibitor (XOI) to treat hyperuricaemia in adults with gout who have not achieved target sUA levels with an XOI alone. Approval was based on three 12-month phase 3 trials that evaluated lesinurad in combination with allopurinol in adults with gout inadequately responsive to allopurinol (CLEAR 1 and 2) and in combination with febuxostat in adults with tophaceous gout (CRYSTAL). The target sUA level of <6 mg/dL at 6 months (primary endpoint) was achieved by significantly more lesinurad plus allopurinol than placebo plus allopurinol recipients in the CLEAR trials. In CRYSTAL (which enrolled patients regardless of prior XOI experience, and included 3 weeks of febuxostat before randomization), the proportion of patients who achieved an sUA target of <5 mg/dL did not reach statistical significance between lesinurad plus febuxostat and placebo plus febuxostat at 6 months (primary endpoint), although significantly favoured the lesinurad plus febuxostat group at 12 months. Notably, the sUA target of <5 mg/dL at 6 months was met with lesinurad plus febuxostat in the CRYSTAL subgroup that had uncontrolled hyperuricaemia at baseline, despite having received febuxostat pre-randomization. Lesinurad plus XOI regimens were generally not associated with improvements in flares and tophi in these trials, although clinical benefit became more apparent in 12-month extension studies; the regimens were also generally well tolerated. Thus, lesinurad, in combination with an XOI, is an emerging option for the treatment of hyperuricaemia in adults with gout who have not achieved target sUA levels with an XOI alone.

Allopurinol, benzbromarone and risk of coronary heart disease in gout patients: A population-based study.

BACKGROUND: The effect of gout on the risk of developing coronary artery disease (CAD) is uncertain. Some studies have found that gout is a risk factor for acute myocardial infarction. This study examined the changes in risk of CAD in gout patients taking allopurinol and/or benzbromarone, and analyzed the dose-response relationship of both drugs with CAD incidence. METHODS: The medical records of one million subjects from 2000 to 2011 were provided by the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. Cox proportional hazard ratio was used to compare the risk of CAD in gout patients taking allopurinol or/and benzbromarone with those taking neither drug. Hazard ratios (HR) were adjusted for possible confounding factors, including age, gender, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, and relevant medications. RESULTS: Of 8047 gout patients, 1422 were treated with allopurinol (Group A), 4141 with benzbromarone (Group B), and 2484 with both drugs (Group A/B) during the follow-up period. Our results showed the incidence of CAD after adjusting for covariates for Group A, Group B, and Group A/B did not significantly differ from the comparison group. However, after adjustment for covariates in dose-response analyses, treatment with over 270 defined daily doses (DDDs) of allopurinol, and over 360 DDDs of benzbromarone, was associated with a significantly reduced risk of CAD. CONCLUSION: We found that the use of allopurinol and benzbromarone, whether alone or in combination, had a linear dose-response relationship between the numbers of defined daily doses and the risk of CAD, especially in higher DDDs.

Lesinurad in combination with allopurinol: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with gout with inadequate response to standard of care (the multinational CLEAR 2 study).

OBJECTIVES: Determine the efficacy and safety of daily lesinurad (200 or 400 mg orally) added to allopurinol in patients with serum uric acid (sUA) above target in a 12-month, randomised, phase III trial. METHODS: Patients on allopurinol ≥300 mg (≥200 mg in moderate renal impairment) had sUA level of ≥6.5 mg/dL (≥387 µmol/L) at screening and two or more gout flares in the prior year. Primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving sUA level of <6.0 mg/dL (<357 µmol/L) (month 6). Key secondary end points were mean gout flare rate requiring treatment (months 7 through 12) and proportions of patients with complete resolution of one or more target tophi (month 12). Safety assessments included adverse events and laboratory data. RESULTS: Patients (n=610) were predominantly male, with mean (±SD) age 51.2±10.90 years, gout duration 11.5±9.26 years and baseline sUA of 6.9±1.2 mg/dL (410±71 µmol/L). Lesinurad at 200 and 400 mg doses, added to allopurinol, significantly increased proportions of patients achieving sUA target versus allopurinol-alone therapy by month 6 (55.4%, 66.5% and 23.3%, respectively, p<0.0001 both lesinurad+allopurinol groups). In key secondary end points, there were no statistically significant treatment-group differences favouring lesinurad. Lesinurad was generally well tolerated; the 200 mg dose had a safety profile comparable with allopurinol-alone therapy. Renal-related adverse events occurred in 5.9% of lesinurad 200 mg+allopurinol, 15.0% of lesinurad 400 mg+allopurinol and 4.9% of allopurinol-alone groups, with serum creatinine elevation of ≥1.5× baseline in 5.9%, 15.0% and 3.4%, respectively. Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 4.4% of lesinurad 200 mg+allopurinol, in 9.5% of lesinurad 400 mg+allopurinol and in 3.9% of allopurinol-alone groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Lesinurad added to allopurinol demonstrated superior sUA lowering versus allopurinol-alone therapy and lesinurad 200 mg was generally well tolerated in patients with gout warranting additional therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01493531.

Lesinurad Combined With Allopurinol: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study in Gout Patients With an Inadequate Response to Standard-of-Care Allopurinol (a US-Based Study).

OBJECTIVE: Lesinurad is a selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor used for the treatment of gout in combination with a xanthine oxidase inhibitor. The Combining Lesinurad with Allopurinol Standard of Care in Inadequate Responders (CLEAR 1) study, a 12-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial, was conducted to investigate daily lesinurad (200 mg or 400 mg orally) added to allopurinol versus placebo plus allopurinol in patients with serum urate (UA) levels above a target of <6.0 mg/dl. METHODS: Patients receiving ≥300 mg of allopurinol (≥200 mg in those with moderate renal impairment) who had serum UA levels ≥6.5 mg/dl at screening and ≥2 gout flares during the previous year were studied. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving a serum UA level of <6.0 mg/dl at month 6. Key secondary end points were the mean gout flare rate requiring treatment (months 7-12) and the proportions of patients with complete resolution of ≥1 target tophus (month 12). Safety assessments included adverse events and laboratory data. RESULTS: The study patients (n = 603) were predominantly male and had a mean ± SD age of 51.9 ± 11.3 years, a gout duration of 11.8 ± 9.4 years, a baseline serum UA level of 6.94 ± 1.27 mg/dl, and were receiving an allopurinol dosage of 306.6 ± 59.58 mg/day. Lesinurad at doses of 200 mg or 400 mg added to allopurinol therapy significantly increased the proportions of patients who achieved serum UA target levels by month 6 as compared with those receiving allopurinol alone (54.2%, 59.2%, and 27.9%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Lesinurad was not significantly superior to allopurinol alone in terms of the secondary end points: rates of gout flares and complete resolution of tophi. Lesinurad was generally well-tolerated; the safety profile of the 200-mg dose was comparable to that of allopurinol alone, except for higher incidences of predominantly reversible elevations of serum creatinine levels. CONCLUSION: Lesinurad added to allopurinol provided benefit as compared with allopurinol alone in reducing serum UA levels and represents a new treatment option for patients needing additional urate-lowering therapy.

Effect of Uric Acid-Lowering Agents on Endothelial Function: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Higher levels of serum uric acid are independently associated with endothelial dysfunction, a mechanism for incident hypertension. Overweight/obese individuals are more prone to endothelial dysfunction than their lean counterparts. However, the effect of lowering serum uric acid on endothelial dysfunction in these individuals has not been examined thoroughly. In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of nonhypertensive, overweight, or obese individuals with higher serum uric acid (body mass index ≥25 kg/m2 and serum uric acid ≥5.0 mg/dL), we assigned subjects to probenecid (500-1000 mg/d), allopurinol (300-600 mg/d), or matching placebo. The primary outcome was endothelium-dependent vasodilation measured by brachial artery ultrasound at baseline and 8 weeks. By the end of the trial, 47, 49, and 53 participants had been allocated to receive probenecid, allopurinol, and placebo, respectively. Mean serum uric acid levels significantly decreased in the probenecid (from 6.1 to 3.5 mg/dL) and allopurinol groups (from 6.1 to 2.9 mg/dL) but not in the placebo group (6.1 to 5.6 mg/dL). None of the interventions produced any significant change in endothelium-dependent vasodilation (probenecid, 7.4±5.1% at baseline and 8.3±5.1% at 8 weeks; allopurinol, 7.6±6.0% at baseline and 6.2±4.8% at 8 weeks; and placebo, 6.5±3.8% at baseline and 7.1±4.9% at 8 weeks). In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, uric acid lowering did not affect endothelial function in overweight or obese nonhypertensive individuals. These data do not support the hypothesis that uric acid is causally related to endothelial dysfunction, a potential mechanism for development of hypertension.

The safety and efficacy of benzbromarone in gout in Aotearoa New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: Benzbromarone is a potent uricosuric but is not widely available due to concerns about hepatotoxicity. In Aotearoa New Zealand, benzbromarone has been available since April 2013, subject to funding restrictions, for patients with inadequate urate-lowering response or intolerance to allopurinol and probenecid. AIM: To assess the safety and efficacy of benzbromarone in a real-life setting. METHODS: All patients who received funding for benzbromarone from 1 April 2013 to 30 September 2014 were identified. Prescribers were sent a questionnaire for each individual. Information on demographics, efficacy of previous urate-lowering drugs and reasons for discontinuation were collected. Specific information about the dose, effect on serum urate, adverse effects and liver function tests after commencing benzbromarone was recorded. RESULTS: Completed questionnaires were returned for 123 of 164 (75%) patients. Mean (SD) serum urate prior to benzbromarone was 0.57 (0.12) mmol/L, and estimated glomerular filtration rate was 50.3 (22.8) mL/min/1.73 m(2) . The median dose of benzbromarone was 100 mg/day (25-200 mg/day). Six months after commencing benzbromarone, mean (SD) serum urate was 0.35 (0.12) mmol/L. Benzbromarone-related adverse events included rash (n = 4), diarrhoea (n = 9), nausea (n = 6) and urate stones (n = 3). Liver function test abnormalities were uncommon and tended to be mild. There were 14 patient deaths; none was considered related to benzbromarone. Allopurinol had been prescribed prior to benzbromarone in 117 of 123 patients; median maximum allopurinol dose was 200 mg/day (range 25-600 mg/day), and 19% patients received allopurinol >300 mg/day. CONCLUSION: Benzbromarone provides useful urate-lowering efficacy and does not appear unsafe in patients with gout. Urate-lowering therapy prescribing requires further optimisation.

[Hyperuricemia. When and how to treat?]. / Hyperurikämie. Wann und wie behandeln?

The prevalence of (asymptomatic) hyperuricemia and gout has substantially increased in recent decades. This development is due to fundamental lifestyle changes, dramatically rising prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome, as well as the increasing age of patients. Therefore, medical treatment of hyperuricemia has regained interest in recent years, in particular since after decades of therapeutic stagnation, new treatments of hyperuricemia have been approved or are currently being investigated in clinical trials. European and American guidelines/recommendations for treatment of hyperuricemia and gout have been updated and revised. Furthermore, the role of asymptomatic hyperuricemia as an (independent) cardiovascular risk factor is again under debate. This article provides assistance in integrating our present knowledge in a therapeutic context and summarizes currently recommended treatment strategies.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of lesinurad, a selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor, in healthy adult males.

Lesinurad is a selective uric acid reabsorption inhibitor under investigation for the treatment of gout. Single and multiple ascending dose studies were conducted to evaluate pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of lesinurad in healthy males. Lesinurad was administered as an oral solution between 5 mg and 600 mg (single ascending dose; N=34) and as an oral solution or immediate-release capsules once daily (qday) between 100 mg and 400 mg for 10 days under fasted or fed condition (multiple ascending dose; N=32). Following single doses of lesinurad solution, absorption was rapid and exposure (maximum observed plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve) increased in a dose-proportional manner. Following multiple qday doses, there was no apparent accumulation of lesinurad. Urinary excretion of unchanged lesinurad was generally between 30% and 40% of dose. Increases in urinary excretion of uric acid and reductions in serum uric acid correlated with dose. Following 400 mg qday dosing, serum uric acid reduction was 35% at 24 hours post-dose, supporting qday dosing. A relative bioavailability study in healthy males (N=8) indicated a nearly identical pharmacokinetic profile following dosing of tablets or capsules. Lesinurad was generally safe and well tolerated.

URAT1 gene polymorphisms influence uricosuric action of losartan in hypertensive patients with hyperuricemia.

AIMS: To explore the effect of urate transporter 1 (URAT1) polymorphisms on the hypertensive patients with hyperuricemia and the uricosuric action of losartan therapy among hypertensive patients with hyperuricemia. METHODS: 101 hypertensive patients with hyperuricemia were detected the genotypes of URAT1 rs1529909 and rs3825016 and undergo a 2-weeks following losartan treatment. Before and after treatment, serum uric acid (SUA) and other clinical data were compared between different genotypes of URAT1 patients. RESULTS: The frequency of rs3825016 (C/T) CT genotype was significant higher in the hypertensive patients with hyperuricemia than that in the healthy controls (32.7 vs 18.8%; p = 0.02). After lorsatan treatment, the patients with the rs3825016 (C/T) or rs1529909 (T/C) mutant genotypes had lower decreased value (DV) of SUA compared with the patients who are wild-type of the variant (p = 0.001 and p < 0.001, respectively). Combined the two variants together, the DV of SUA in two variants both wild-type patients higher than that in the two variants mutant patients (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that URAT1 rs3825016 and rs1529909 polymorphisms influence the uricosuric action of losartan. Original submitted 20 August 2014; Revision submitted 15 April 2015.

Allopurinol reduces the lethality associated with acute renal failure induced by Crotalus durissus terrificus snake venom: comparison with probenecid.

BACKGROUND: Acute renal failure is one of the most serious complications of envenoming resulting from Crotalus durissus terrificus bites. This study evaluated the relevance of hyperuricemia and oxidative stress and the effects of allopurinol and probenecid in renal dysfunction caused by direct nephrotoxicity of C. d. terrificus venom. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Hematocrit, protein, renal function and redox status were assessed in mice. High ratio of oxidized/reduced glutathione and hyperuricemia induced by C. d. terrificus venom were ameliorated by both, allopurinol or probenecid, but only allopurinol significantly reduced the lethality caused by C. d. terrificus venom. The effectiveness of probenecid is compromised probably because it promoted hypercreatinemia and hypocreatinuria and worsed the urinary hypo-osmolality in envenomed mice. In turn, the highest effectiveness of allopurinol might be due to its ability to diminish the intracellular formation of uric acid. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Data provide consistent evidences linking uric acid with the acute renal failure induced by C. d. terrificus venom, as well as that this envenoming in mice constitutes an attractive animal model suitable for studying the hyperuricemia and that the allopurinol deserves to be clinically evaluated as an approach complementary to anti-snake venom serotherapy.

Prevalence of contraindications and prescription of pharmacologic therapies for gout.

BACKGROUND: Patients with gout have comorbidities, but the impact of these comorbidities on treatment has not been studied. METHODS: A total of 575 patients with gout were stratified according to certainty of diagnosis according to International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification code alone (cohort I), American College of Radiology criteria (cohort II), and crystal diagnosis (cohort III). Comorbid conditions were defined according to International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes, and stratified as either moderate or severe. Drug contraindications were defined as moderate or strong, based on Food and Drug Administration criteria and severity of disease. RESULTS: The most common comorbidity was hypertension (prevalence 0.89). The presence of comorbidities resulted in a high frequency of contraindications to approved gout medications. More than 90% of patients had at least 1 contraindication to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Many patients demonstrated multiple contraindications to 1 or more gout medications. Frequently, patients were prescribed medications to which they harbored contraindications. The prevalence of patients prescribed colchicine despite having at least 1 strong contraindication was 30% (cohort I), 37% (cohort II), and 39.6% (cohort III). CONCLUSION: Patients with gout typically harbor multiple comorbidities that result in contraindications to many of the medications available to treat gout. Frequently, despite contraindications to gout therapies, patients are frequently prescribed these medications.

Interactions of urate transporter URAT1 in human kidney with uricosuric drugs.

AIM: Hyperuricaemia is a significant factor in a variety of diseases, including gout and cardiovascular diseases. The kidney plays a dominant role in maintaining plasma urate levels through the excretion process. Human renal urate transporter URAT1 is thought to be an essential molecule that mediates the reabsorption of urate on the apical side of the proximal tubule. In this study the pharmacological characteristics and clinical implications of URAT1 were elucidated. METHODS: Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells stably expressing URAT1 (MDCK-URAT1) were established and examined the interactions of URAT1 with various drugs such as benzbromarone and its metabolites including 6-hydroxybenzbromarone, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and urate transport inhibitors including E3040 and probenecid. RESULTS: MDCK-URAT1 cells exhibited a time- and dose-dependent increase in urate uptake, with a Km value of 570.7 µmol/L. When an URAT1-green fluorescent protein fusion protein construct was expressed in MDCK cells, the protein was sorted mainly to the apical side of the membrane. The drugs except for captoril dose-dependently inhibited urate uptake mediated by URAT1, with half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC(50) ) values ranging 0.05-716 µmol/L. CONCLUSION: Comparing these IC(50) values with intratubular concentrations of unbound drugs in humans, it is thought that URAT1 is a target molecule of uricosuric drugs, including 6-hydroxybenzbromarone, probenecid, indomethacin and salicylate, to inhibit urate reabsorption in vivo. In addition, a cell line that stably expressing URAT1 could be a useful tool for the development of uricosuric drugs.

Impact of noncompliance with urate-lowering drug on serum urate and gout-related healthcare costs: administrative claims analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between allopurinol compliance and serum urate (sUA) level; and examine the association between sUA and gout-related healthcare costs in a large managed care population. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This retrospective administrative claims analysis examined subjects with gout (> or = 2 medical claims with ICD-9-CM diagnosis code 274.xx or > or = 1 claim with a gout diagnosis and > or = 1 pharmacy claim for allopurinol, probenecid, colchicine, or sulfinpyrazone) between January 1, 2002 and March 31, 2004. Each subject was observed during 1-year pre-index and 1-year post-index periods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes were allopurinol medication possession ratio (MPR) and compliance (MPR > or = 0.80), sUA (mg/dL), and gout-related healthcare costs. 'Post-allopurinol' sUA was measured during three periods after the first observed allopurinol fill: 30-89 days; 90-149 days; > or = 150 days. A baseline sUA on or before the start of the post-index period was also identified. Outcomes were stratified by post-allopurinol or baseline sUA and compliance. Generalized linear modeling (GLM) regression measured the impact of baseline sUA on gout-related healthcare costs, controlling for demographic and health status variables. RESULTS: The study sample comprised 18,243 subjects with mean age of 53.9 years. In all, 55% (n = 10,073) of subjects used allopurinol. There were 1473 (8.1%) subjects with a post-allopurinol sUA and 2438 (13.4%) subjects with a baseline sUA result. Among all subjects with a post-allopurinol sUA, 45.6% were compliant; between 49.3% and 56.8% of compliant subjects had an sUA < 6.0 mg/dL compared with 22.5-27.8% of non-compliant subjects, depending on the post-allopurinol time period (all p < 0.001). GLM results showed gout-related costs associated with baseline sUA > or = 6.0 and < 9.0 mg/dL were 58% higher (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.012 -2.456; p = 0.044) than were costs for sUA < 6.0 mg/dL. There was no significant difference in gout-related costs between baseline sUA < 6.0 mg/dL and > or = 9.0 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis revealed an important associations between allopurinol compliance, sUA, and gout-related costs: compliance was positively associated with favorable sUA (<6.0 mg/dL) in unadjusted comparisons. GLM showed that baseline sUA < 6.0 was inversely associated with gout-related costs relative to baseline sUA > or = 6.0 and <9.0 mg/dL. Nevertheless, a substantial portion of subjects, even compliant ones, did not achieve sUA < 6.0 mg/dL. These results should be interpreted carefully in light of study limitations, including incomplete laboratory data, the potentially incorrect inference that medications were taken as prescribed, and lack of generalizability from Medicare managed care enrollees to the broader Medicare population.

A randomised controlled trial on the efficacy and tolerability with dose escalation of allopurinol 300-600 mg/day versus benzbromarone 100-200 mg/day in patients with gout.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of allopurinol 300-600 mg/day versus benzbromarone 100-200 mg/day used to attain a target serum urate concentration (sUr) < or =0.30 mmol/l (5 mg/dl). METHODS: A randomised, controlled, open-label, multicentre trial in gout patients with renal function defined as a calculated creatinine clearance > or =50 ml/min. Patients were treated with 300 mg allopurinol or 100 mg benzbromarone once a day (stage 1). If sUr < or =0.30 mmol/l was not attained after 2 months, the dose was doubled to allopurinol 300 mg twice a day or benzbromarone 200 mg once a day (stage 2). The primary end point was treatment success in either of the two stages, defined as clinical tolerability and attainment of biochemical target sUr. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were enrolled in stage 1; 36 received allopurinol and 29 received benzbromarone. Fifty-five patients (85%) were analysed at stage 1: the success rates were 8/31 (26%) and 13/25 (52%), respectively, and the difference was -0.26 (95% CI from -0.486 to -0.005), p = 0.049. At stage 2, the success rates were 21/27 (78%) and 18/23 (78%), respectively, and the difference was -0.005 (95% CI from -0.223 to 0.220), p = 1.00. Two patients stopped receiving allopurinol and three stopped receiving benzbromarone because of adverse drug reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the allopurinol dose from 300 to 600 mg/day and the benzbromarone dose from 100 to 200 mg/day according to the target sUr produced significantly higher success rates (both 78% successful in attaining sUr < or =0.30 mmol/l). No significant differences in treatment success between benzbromarone and allopurinol were found after dose escalation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN49563848).