Conversion of Arterio-Venous Access of Hemodialysis to Arterio-Arterial Access for Treatment of Venous hypertension with Central Venous Occlusion.

This report describes conversion of arterio-venous graft or fistula to arterio-arterial vascular access as a new surgical treatment option for central venous occlusion. It starts with control of the axillary vein and the synthetic graft or superficialized vein proximally, the suture line of venous anastomosis is closed and end-to-side anastomosis of the synthetic graft or vein to the brachial artery (BA) is done, then ligation of the BA distal to the anastomosis is done. Now the blood flow is directed through synthetic graft or vein from proximal to distal BA that can be used as arterio-arterial vascular access for hemodialysis.

A Rare Case of Dysplastic Axillary Artery Aneurysm Associated with Arteriovenous Malformation.

BACKGROUND: Axillary artery aneurysms are rare conditions, and their causes are various. They can determine severe complications, so the treatment is extremely important. METHODS: We report the case of a young man affected by a saccular axillary artery aneurysm associated with intramuscular arteriovenous malformation, without symptoms except for the presence of a pulsatile mass. Duplex scan and computed tomography scan have been essential for a correct diagnosis and planning of the treatment. At first, the patient was submitted to coil embolization of an efferent vessel, and then he was treated surgically through ligation and detachment of the aneurysm and replacement of part of the axillary artery with a Dacron graft (Vascutek, Inchinnan, Renfrewshire, Scotland, UK). RESULTS: Follow-up at 1 and 6 months revealed normal patency of the axillary arterty and the prosthetic graft with complete exclusion and thrombosis of the aneurysm sac.No sensitive nor motor deficit were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Aneurysms of the axillary artery associated with intramuscular arteriovenous malformations are very rare, but have to be suspected. The treatment is challenging and can be surgical, endovascular, or hybrid, based on the patient's conditions and aneurysm's anatomical features.

Outcomes of a Polytetrafluoroethylene Hybrid Vascular Graft with Preloaded Nitinol Stent at the Venous Outflow for Dialysis Vascular Access.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate outcomes and patency of arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) created using Gore hybrid vascular grafts in hemodialysis patients with limited venous outflow or challenging anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed in two academic centers of all patients between July 2013 and December 2016 who underwent surgical AVG creation using a Gore hybrid vascular graft in a brachial artery to axillary configuration. Patient characteristics and comorbidities as well as graft patency, function, and subsequent need for percutaneous interventions were recorded. RESULTS: Forty-six patients including 30 females (65.2%) and 16 males (34.8%) with a mean age of 63 ± 13 years were identified. The most common indications for a hybrid vascular graft were limited surgical accessibility and/or revision of existing AVG due to severe stenotic lesions at the venous outflow in 33 patients (72%). One-year primary unassisted and assisted patency rates were 44 ± 8% and 54 ± 8%, respectively, compared with 1-year secondary patency rate of 66 ± 8%. The rate of percutaneous interventions to maintain graft function and patency was approximately one intervention per graft per year. CONCLUSIONS: Access created with the hybrid vascular graft in a brachial-axillary (brachial artery to axillary vein) configuration is an acceptable option for patients with limited venous outflow reserve and challenging anatomy. Twelve-month primary and secondary patency rates and need for percutaneous interventions were comparable to traditional AVGs.

Surgical Treatment of Cephalic Arch Problems in Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: Cephalic arch problems, mainly stenosis, are a common cause of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) failure, and the most effective treatment is yet to be clearly defined. Restenosis usually occurs soon, and multiple interventions become necessary to maintain patency and functionality. The authors present the experience of their center with cephalic vein transposition in a group of patients with different problems involving the cephalic arch. METHODS: After consultation of the medical records, an observational retrospective analysis was performed to evaluate the outcomes of surgical treatment in cephalic arch problems of AVFs treated at the author's center between January 2013 and December 2015. The considered outcomes were endovascular intervention rate, thrombosis rate, and primary and secondary patencies. RESULTS: Seven patients were treated by venovenostomy with transposition of the cephalic arch and anastomosis to the axillary vein. The average patient age was 72 years (59-81), and most patients were female (71%) and diabetic (71%). All accesses were brachiocephalic AVFs with a mean duration of 4 years (1-7). The underlying problems were intrinsic cephalic arch stenosis (n = 5), entrapment of the cephalic vein (n = 1), and clinically significant vein tortuosity at the cephalic arch (n = 1). These last 2 problems conducted to a surgical approach as first-line therapy instead of endovascular intervention, the initial treatment in the other 5 cases (all with high-pressure balloons, with cutting balloon in one case). Previous thrombotic episodes were reported in 57% of the patients. The mean access flow before surgical intervention was 425 mL/min (350-1,500). No complications related with the surgical procedure were reported. One patient underwent surgical thrombectomy after AVF thrombosis, followed by transposition of the vein. In another case, a simultaneous flow reduction was performed. Most of the patients on dialysis (5/6) used the AVF after surgery. After a mean follow-up period of 9 months (1-22), surgical treatment was associated with a reduction in endovascular intervention rate (1.9 interventions per patient-year presurgery versus 0.4 postsurgery; P < 0.05) and thrombosis rate (0.93 thrombotic episodes per patient-year presurgery versus 0.17 postsurgery; P < 0.05). The problems leading to endovascular reintervention were as follows: new venous anastomosis stenosis (57%), axillary vein stenosis (29%), and swing-point stenosis (14%). Primary and secondary patencies at 6 months were 57% and 71%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of patients with cephalic arch problems and multiple previous procedures, surgical treatment was associated with a reduction in endovascular intervention and thrombosis rate but did not avoid reintervention. Facing the complexity and multiplicity of the cephalic arch complications, treatment should be individually decided.

Role of Brachial Artery Ligation in Management of Prosthetic Arteriovenous Graft Infections.

BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous graft (AVG) infections can present as major life-threatening hemorrhage or sepsis in a chronic kidney disease patient. Frequently, all these patients present in critical condition which need prompt and expeditious management. Various procedures are described for management of infected grafts and its bleeding complications. However, these procedures are associated with postop-operative bleeding and persistent infection. The aim was to study brachial artery ligation (BAL) near the elbow joint in the management of an infected AVG. METHODS: It was a retrospective study where data collection was done for 51 patients who underwent BAL in infected AVGs from January 2007 to December 2016. RESULTS: During the study period, AVG infections were treated in 62 patients. Fifty-one BALs were done in 62 limbs treated. All were arm grafts (brachial artery to axillary vein) using expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. In 49 patients, BAL was done as a primary procedure. In 2 patients, BAL was done after they presented with uncontrolled infection after initial subtotal excision with oversewing of graft stump at arterial anastomosis. There were 36 men and 15 women, with a mean age of 49 years (range, 23-82). The primary etiologies for renal failure were hypertension (56.2%), diabetes (34.3%), and others (9.5%). Follow-up was 100% at 1 month and 82.3% (42 patients) at 3 months, and none showed any signs of ischemia or sepsis. All had biphasic signals in radial and ulnar arteries with normal peripheral capillary oxygen saturation readings in fingers. None of the patients underwent additional interventions. CONCLUSIONS: BAL in AVG infections is a safe alternative considering the critical general condition of chronic kidney disease patient. It reduces the operative time significantly and avoids complex revascularization and anastomotic dehiscence without any ischemic or bleeding complications. BAL near the elbow joint in patients with good back-bleeding can be used as a primary approach in an infected AVG. However, close monitoring of patient in postoperative period is essential.

Significance of Blunted Venous Waveforms Seen on Upper Extremity Ultrasound.

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend vascular mapping ultrasound (US) prior to arteriovenous fistula creation. Blunted venous waveforms (BVWs) suggest central venous stenosis; however, this relationship and one between BVWs and the presence of a central venous catheter (CVC) remain unclear. METHODS: All patients who received upper extremity vascular mapping US between January 2013 and October 2014 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, US results, pacemaker history, and CVC status were collected. Waveforms were assessed at the proximal subclavian vein/distal axillary vein and interpreted by radiologists. Patients were determined to have central venous stenosis (CVS) if detected by venography within 6 months of US. RESULTS: There were 342 patients, of which 165 (48%) had a current CVC and 29 (8.5%) had BVW of at least 1 arm. Right-sided BVW were associated with a history of a prior ipsilateral CVC (odds ratio [OR] = 4.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.6-12.6, P = 0.009). Of the 342 patients, 69 (20%) had a venogram within 6 months. Seventeen (25%) of the 69 patients had CVS, with 7 involving the left subclavian vein, 8 the right subclavian vein, and 3 the superior vena cava (one patient had tandem stenoses). A BVW on the left side was not associated with any CVS. A BVW on the right side was associated with an ipsilateral CVS (OR = 5.8, 95% CI = 1.2-27.4, P = 0.04). This association persisted in the setting of a prior CVC (relative risk = 1.3, 95% CI = 0.9-2, P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: There are associations between right-sided BVW and an ipsilateral subclavian vein stenosis. We recommend that hemodialysis access planning includes venography to rule out central vein stenosis in patients with BVW, especially if right-sided and in the setting of a prior CVC.

A Case of Acute Ischemic Monomelic Neuropathy and Review of the Literature.

Ischemia monomelic neuropathy is rare and underrecognized complication of hemodialysis access (HA), characterized by diffuse multiple mononeuropathies in the absence of significant clinical ischemia. It is important to diagnose this syndrome early because ligation of the HA is the most accepted treatment to prevent or at least halt irreversible neural dysfunction and therefore, chronic pain and disability. Literature describing this fistulae-related pathology is rare, and we attempt to increase its awareness.

Arteriovenous Hybrid Graft with Outflow in the Proximal Axillary Vein.

BACKGROUND: The patency of long-term hemodialysis access in end-stage renal disease patients remains a significant challenge. Often these patients are affected with limited venous outflow options, requiring limb abandonment, and creation of new access in the contralateral arm. Vascular surgeons are familiar with the exposure of the proximal axillary artery via an infraclavicular incision. The axillary vein is easily exposed through this technique. The use of the hybrid Gore graft can make the venous anastomosis easier. A hybrid graft with its venous outflow placed in the proximal axillary vein can extend the options of upper extremity access procedures. We reviewed our early experience with this technique. METHODS: A review of dialysis procedures at the Loma Linda VA was performed. All patients undergoing placement of arteriovenous grafts utilizing the Gore hybrid placed into the proximal axillary vein for outflow were identified. Outcomes in terms of primary and secondary patency rates were determined. RESULTS: Eight patients had placement of an arteriovenous hybrid graft in the proximal axillary vein via an infraclavicular incision. All patients had exhausted other options for hemodialysis access in the ipsilateral upper extremity. All grafts were used successfully for dialysis. The mean primary and secondary patency rates at 6 months were 37.5% and 62.5%, respectively. One patient developed steal syndrome, requiring proximalization of the graft. Seven out of the 8 patients required secondary procedures including thrombectomy (n = 16) and angioplasty (n = 17). CONCLUSIONS: Placement of a hybrid graft in the proximal axillary vein is an effective and suitable option for patients who have exhausted arteriovenous access sites in the arm. This procedure can easily be performed in an outpatient setting with a low complication rate and allowing for preservation of the contralateral upper extremity for future use.

Single-center results of a series of prosthetic axillary-axillary arteriovenous access grafts for hemodialysis.

OBJECTIVE: Prosthetic infraclavicular axillary-axillary arteriovenous access grafts are one of a number of complex dialysis access options in patients when all of the usual upper limb possibilities have been exhausted. We present a follow-up of 35 patients who received this access graft during a 9-year period. METHODS: Patients were identified from our own operation records. Follow-up data were gathered from their locally held electronic medical records. Primary and secondary patency were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier estimate. RESULTS: During the study period, 15 of the 35 patients in our cohort underwent one or more revision operations. Primary patency was estimated at 88% at 6 months, and the secondary patency rate estimate was 54% at 48 months. Twelve patients died during the study period; the grafts in 17 of the 23 remaining patients were in use at the conclusion of the study. CONCLUSIONS: Although this is a small cohort, our results suggest that prosthetic axillary-axillary arteriovenous access should be at least considered as a viable long-term option for hemodialysis patients.

Transcatheter anastomosis connector system for vascular access graft placement: results from a first-in-human pilot study.

PURPOSE: A lengthy healing and maturation period follows standard surgical preparation of a permanent arteriovenous access, often requiring or extending use of a venous catheter (VC) for hemodialysis. The InterGraft™ Anastomotic Connector System was developed for minimally invasive anastomosis of an arteriovenous graft (AVG). The venous and arterial InterGraft™ connectors are designed to provide optimized flow dynamics and may result in reduction of AVG stenosis. This pilot study evaluated placement procedure success, patency and safety of the InterGraft™ connectors. METHODS: Nine AVGs were implanted in nine patients currently receiving dialysis with a VC. The study allowed use of both connectors (n = 5) or use of the venous connector with a sutured arterial anastomosis (n = 4). Monthly ultrasound examinations were performed throughout the six-month follow-up. AVG angiography was performed at five months. Endpoints included procedure success (acceptable graft flow at end of procedure, without significant bleeding or need for emergent surgery), patency, and device-related major adverse events. RESULTS: Procedure success was attained in all patients. AVGs were used for dialysis within 17 days, on average, and VCs were removed. Three patients exited the study early for reasons unrelated to the InterGraft™ connectors. The remaining six patients had patent grafts: two with assisted and four with unassisted patency. AVG flow rates were greater than 1 L/minute. No dilatations or aneurysms were observed by angiography. There were no device-related major adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: The InterGraft™ connectors can be safely and successfully used for AVG anastomoses, with acceptable near-term patency. Further clinical evaluation is warranted.

A modified approach of proximalization of arterial inflow technique for hand ischemia in patients with matured basilic and cephalic veins.

OBJECTIVE: Proximalization of arteriovenous inflow (PAI) is an established technique for treating patients with access-induced hand ischemia. However, a prosthetic graft, used as arterial inflow, could minimize the benefits of a purely native fistula. In this study, a new PAI technique is reported, which avoids the use of prosthetic grafts in patients with matured basilic and cephalic veins. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight patients (seven men, one woman; mean age 62 (45-82) years old) with grade III/IV critical dialysis access-related ischemia (DARI) and with a pre-existing Gracz fistula underwent an operation using modified PAI. The basilic and cephalic veins were preoperatively matured. During the operation, the former arteriovenous anastomosis was closed and the basilic vein was used as arterial inflow. RESULTS: All procedures were technically successful. All patients but one could be discharged with a warm, neurologically improved extremity with a significant reduction in pain. After a mean follow-up of 43.5 (0-52) months, there were no recurrent steal symptoms and all necrotic hand lesions healed. Two patients died during the follow-up, but with well-functioning fistulae. One fistula failed during follow-up and one further fistula was ligated because of chronic neurological damage, which was not improved after the PAI procedure. Four AVFs are still available for hemodialysis. CONCLUSIONS: The modification of the PAI technique with a basilic vein as presented here showed similar results to the original PAI procedure. This new procedure does not require prosthetic grafts as in the original PAI technique or a central venous catheter and leads to the enlargement of the puncture site as a result of the superficialization of the basilic vein. Therefore, it is believed that this new technique could be a good option for those patients with matured cephalic and basilic veins who suffer from severe access-related ischemia.

Longevity and outcomes of axillary valve transplantation for severe lower extremity chronic venous insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: To assess the efficacy of axillary vein transplantation in the treatment of severe chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). METHODS: Among 139 complex venous reconstructions performed between 1991 and 2007 for CVI, 18 patients underwent upper extremity to lower extremity venous valve transplantation. An upper extremity valve was transplanted to the popliteal vein in 13 cases, to the common femoral vein in six cases, and to the saphenofemoral junction in two cases for a total of 21 procedures. All patients had follow-up with duplex scanning to assess valve competency and clinical visits to assess clinical improvement. Mean follow-up period was 37 months. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 44 years, and 57% were men. Clinically, 57% of the limbs were Clincal (C) class C5-C6. The mean preoperative venous disability score was 2.95. Most of the patients (66%) had post-thrombotic valvular dysfunction. At the time of valve transplantation, there was no proximal venous obstruction documented. A successful operation was defined as a competent valve at the end of the procedure and was achieved in 20 of 21 (95%) patients. Eight patients had at least one postoperative complication, primarily bleeding. The mean postoperative venous disability score was 2.65 and this increased to 2.75 (p = not significant as compared with baseline) at the last postoperative visit. Median time to return of symptoms was 12 months, and median reflux-free survival period was 15 months. CONCLUSION: Despite initial technical and symptomatic success with venous valve transplantation, there is a poor long-term valve competency rate and symptomatic control. These data suggest that a better understanding and therapy for severe CVI associated with valvular incompetence needs to be found.

Deep vein thromboembolism after arthroscopy of the shoulder: two case reports and a review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) has an incidence of 1 case per 1000 inhabitants in the general population and it is very rare after arthroscopy of the shoulder. Therefore, the current guidelines do not advise the administration of DVT prophylaxis in shoulder arthroscopy procedures. CASES PRESENTATION: We describe two cases of thrombosis of the arm after shoulder arthroscopy on a total of 10.452 shoulder arthroscopies performed during a period of ten years. One of two patients was further complicated by a bilateral pulmonary microembolism. In these two clinical cases the complication developed despite the absence of risk factors such as a concomitant neoplasm, thrombophilia, smoking habit, or a long duration of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: The DVT after shoulder arthroscopy procedure remain a very rare complication. However, in view of the growing number of patients undergoing this procedure, this figure is expected to rise. The clinician surgeon should take in mind this possible complication that normally appears in the first 3 weeks after surgery, so to perform anti-coagulant treatment. Further clinical studies are therefore warranted to assess the true risk of VTE. In fact, the presence of "minor" predisposing factors that are not routinely studied, as well as the postoperative immobilization period, are potential risk factors that, associated with the invasiveness of the arthroscopy procedure, could trigger a thromboembolism.

Aggressive treatment of idiopathic axillo-subclavian vein thrombosis provides excellent long-term function.

OBJECTIVE: While much attention has been devoted toward treatment paradigms for idiopathic axillo-subclavian vein thrombosis (ASVT), little has focused on long-term durability of aggressive treatment and its associated functional outcomes. The purpose of this study was to review our own surgical therapeutic algorithm and its associated durability and functional outcomes. METHODS: All patients treated with combined endovascular and open surgery at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center for ASVT from 1988 to 2008 were identified. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and operative techniques were recorded. Patency, freedom from reintervention, and functional outcomes were documented. Follow-up via telephone and clinic visit allowed quantitative comparison of functional status, pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients were treated for ASVT throughout the study interval. Seven patients (19.4%) were lost to follow-up. Most patients were male (66%; N = 24); mean age was 32 years. Catheter-directed thrombolysis was utilized in the majority of patients (83.3%; N = 30) with an average time from symptom onset to lysis of 12 days. Surgical decompression was undertaken in all patients via transaxillary (52%; N = 19), supraclavicular (31%; N = 11), or infraclavicular approaches (17%; N = 6). Eleven stents were placed in 11 patients (30.5%) for residual stenotic disease. Mean follow-up was 65 months, with 1- and 5-year overall patency at 100% and 94%, respectively. Freedom from reintervention was 100% and 74.4% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. Seven patients (19.4%) required postoperative reintervention with four receiving additional lytic therapy, two requiring a stent, and one venoplasty. At presentation, 65.5% (N = 19) of patients were unable to work or perform routine activities. After treatment, 86% (N = 25) returned to their employment and have experienced sustained symptomatic and functional improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with symptomatic idiopathic axillo-subclavian vein thrombosis can expect durable patency with sustained freedom from reintervention following aggressive combined endovascular and surgical treatment. Good functional outcomes can be expected in patients with relief of symptoms and return to work.

The role of a vascular access surgeon in ventriculo-venous shunts in difficult hydrocephalus.

INTRODUCTION: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversion into the right atrium or peritoneal cavity is the mainstay of treatment for normotensive hydrocephalus. Unfortunately multiple shunt failures can lead to patients returning for repeat interventions, leaving drainage options limited. We present a case series of five patients requiring venous access for shunt placement. METHODS: Using the St Georges technique of axillary vein dissection, a suitable vein draining into the axillary vein was found and a shunt inserted under direct vision into the vein. RESULTS: Four females and one male were retrospectively followed up from first venous shunt employment in February 2003 to May 2008. Of the 34 revised shunts performed (ventriculo-peritoneal, ventriculo-pleural or ventriculo-venous) in the group, 13 procedures included the use of the axillary vein for CSF diversion. All shunts had a cumulative primary and secondary patency of 50% and 80% at 1 yr, respectively. There was no significant difference in the primary or secondary patency between the three types. CONCLUSIONS: We have presented a series of 35 primary and secondary shunts in five patients with hydrocephalus. All patients had exhausted all CSF diversion options prior to the use of the axillary vein. With comparable survival of the axillary shunts with ventriculo-pleural and peritoneal shunts, we therefore present a favorable outcome in the use of the axillary vein for CSF diversion.

Arteriovenous graft with outflow in the proximal axillary vein.

Arteriovenous access can result in complications including extremity ischemia and swelling. Use of the nondominant upper extremity is preferred because complications will result in less severe disability. The distal axillary vein in the axilla is usually considered to be the end point for arteriovenous access in the upper extremity. Vascular surgeons are familiar with exposure of the proximal axillary artery via an infraclavicular incision. The axillary vein is also easily exposed through this technique. Use of this vein for arteriovenous graft outflow can preserve the dominant arm for future use. Nine patients with arteriovenous grafts with venous outflow in the proximal arm for future use. All patients had exposure to the proximal axillary vein via an infraclavicular incision. There were six women and three men. All patients had multiple failed access in the ipsilateral extremity. One patient had a loop configuration graft, while the six others had a straight graft with arterial inflow via the brachial artery. One patient had a bovine mesenteric vein graft, while the remaining six had expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts. Six of the seven patients had ambulatory surgery, while one patient was admitted postoperatively with mental status changes. Patency rates were 78%, with mean follow-up of 16 months. One patient had early failure due to steal and one patient failed at 22 months. Six of seven patients are alive at current follow-up. Three patients required secondary procedures including venous angioplasty (n=2) and subclavian artery stenting (n=1). The infraclavicular axillary vein can be used as an effective outflow for arteriovenous grafts. This procedure can be done as an outpatient surgery with a low complication rate. This procedure can preserve the dominant arm for future access and provides a possible alternative to surgery on another extremity.

Prosthetic axillary-axillary arteriovenous straight access (necklace graft) for difficult hemodialysis patients: a prospective single-center experience.

BACKGROUND: It is not uncommon for all usual upper limb autogenous access sites to fail, often in patients for whom neither peritoneal dialysis nor transplantation is an appropriate option. Axillary-axillary arteriovenous bypass grafts could be used as the last option before a thigh autogenous access even in case of unilateral central venous stenosis or obstruction. We describe our experience with this procedure in a series of patients. METHODS: A consecutive series of 18 patients for whom all possible arm accesses had failed and neither peritoneal dialysis nor transplantation was possible underwent a necklace graft formation over a 2.5-year period. All grafts implanted were 6 mm, internally reinforced prostheses made of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE, Gore-Tex Intering Vascular Graft, W. L. Gore and Associates, Inc, Flagstaff, Ariz) anastomosed end to side the axillary artery and contralateral vein, and tunneled straight in the subcutaneous space before the sternum. All patients had bimonthly clinical examinations in which the thrill, bruit, skin, cannulation sites, and dialysis adequacy were reviewed. They also had at the same time a transonic assessment where graft flows and recirculation rates were measured. In case of low flow (<600 mL/min) or drop of 20% between two measurements or recirculation >5% a fistulogram was obtained, and an intervention was performed to restore patency. RESULTS: We operated on 10 males and 8 females; mean age was 55.1 years. The primary patency was 83% and 72.2%, and the secondary patency was 94.4% and 88.9% at 6 months and 1 year, respectively. Five successful surgical revisions were carried out for four clotted grafts and one post dialysis rupture. One surgical revision for thrombosis failed and one local infection lead to thrombosis and was not amenable to surgical revision. Three patients died of causes unrelated to their vascular access during the study period. CONCLUSION: The reasonable patency and minimal complications associated with these bypasses show that they are a valid option for complex patients. We advocate the use of this bypass in patients with exhaustion of all access possibilities in both arms with a patent superior vena cava, subclavian, and brachiocephalic veins. We also indicate it in case of unilateral central venous stenosis or obstruction with complete exhaustion of all other access possibilities on the contralateral side.

Arteriovenous fistula construction using femoral vein in the thigh and upper extremity: single-center experience.

The objective of this study was to determine the outcome of femoral vein (FV) access as either a FV thigh transposition or upper extremity FV translocation. This is a retrospective review of all end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who underwent FV access at the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center from December 2004 to May 2007. Demographics, number of prior access procedures, FV dialysis access procedure, periprocedural complications, mean follow-up, secondary access-related procedures, and access function were recorded. Complications were subdivided into FV harvest site- and ischemia-related. Nineteen patients underwent FV access during the study period: 10 underwent FV thigh transpositions and nine underwent upper extremity FV translocations. The median number of prior access procedures was two. The median hospital stay was 3 days, and there were no perioperative deaths. Eight patients had FV harvest site complications: six lymphoceles, one AVF infection requiring ligation, and one compartment syndrome requiring fasciotomy. Three (16%) patients had ischemic complications: one required ligation of the AVF and two required distal revascularization interval ligation. Seventy-nine percent of patients had a functioning access at a mean follow-up of 6 months (range 23 days to 3 years). Four FV arteriovenous accesses required one or more endovascular procedures to maintain function at 12 months. The use of FV access in ESRD is durable at intermediate follow-up but has significant morbidity. FV access should be reserved for good-risk patients who have exhausted other autogenous options.