Cystic Adventitial Disease of the Popliteal Vein: A Case Report.

Venous cystic adventitial disease (VCAD) is a rare vascular anomaly located in the common femoral vein in most cases. We describe the case of a 59-year-old female patient with right leg edema who was misdiagnosed with deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremity at another hospital. Magnetic resonance angiography revealed a round mass in the popliteal vein, with a narrow lumen. Considering the location of the lesion, absence of a history of deep venous thrombosis and trauma, and clinical manifestations, the diagnosis is likely a popliteal vein adventitial cyst. Segmental popliteal vein resection and reconstruction were performed using a cylindrical great saphenous vein graft. No joint connection was found during the operation, and the postoperative pathology confirmed VCAD.

Popliteal vein reflux is associated with increased rates of thrombotic complications after small saphenous vein closure procedures.

BACKGROUND: Venous insufficiency in the small saphenous vein (SSV) is significantly less common than venous insufficiency in the great saphenous vein; the impact of popliteal vein reflux on SSV closure procedural outcomes has yet to be studied. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on 150 SSV closure procedures from 2015 to 2019. Preoperative demographic analysis was performed, after which univariate analyses were performed for postoperative occlusion rates and combined rates of endothermal heat-induced thrombus (EHIT) and endovenous foam-induced thrombus (EFIT). RESULTS: The cohort had a mean age of 58 years, and 116 (77%) were female. Fifty-four patients had C2 disease, 76 had C3 disease, 15 had C4 disease, 1 had C5 disease, and 4 had C6 disease. Twenty-three patients (15.3%) were noted to have popliteal vein reflux on their initial venous insufficiency ultrasound study, compared with 127 (84.6%) who did not. Treatment modalities included 84 radiofrequency ablations (56.0%), 37 polidocanol endovenous microfoam (24.6%), and 29 laser ablations (19.3%). When comparing patients with popliteal vein reflux with those without, there was no significant difference in the occlusion rates at their immediate postoperative visit (99.2% vs 95.6%) or at their 6-month postoperative visit (92.1% vs 91.3%). EHIT/EFIT was noted in 4 of the 23 patients with popliteal vein reflux compared with 4 of the 127 patients without popliteal vein reflux (17.3% vs 3.1%; P = .01). All eight instances of EHIT/EFIT were classified as either arteriovenous fistula class I or II EHIT or EFIT, and all were successfully treated without progression to deep vein thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of popliteal vein reflux has no impact on postoperative occlusion rates at 6 months; however, it is associated with a significantly increased rate in EHIT and EFIT. Patients should be counseled on this increased risk should they undergo SSV treatment with known popliteal vein reflux.

Contemporary management and outcomes of peripheral venous aneurysms: A multi-institutional study.

OBJECTIVE: Extremity venous aneurysms result in the risk of pulmonary embolism (PE) and chronic venous insufficiency. At present, owing to the rarity of these aneurysms, no consensus for their treatment has been established. The purpose of the present study was to review the presentation, natural history, and contemporary management of extremity venous aneurysms. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multi-institutional review of all patients with extremity venous aneurysms treated from 2008 to 2018. A venous aneurysm was defined as saccular or fusiform with an aneurysm/vein ratio of >1.5. RESULTS: A total of 66 extremity aneurysms from 11 institutions were analyzed, 40 of which were in a popliteal location, 14 iliofemoral, and 12 in an upper extremity or a jugular location. The median follow-up was 27 months (range, 0-120 months). Of the 40 popliteal venous aneurysms, 8 (20%) had presented with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) or PE, 13 (33%) had presented with pain, and 19 had been discovered incidentally. The mean size of the popliteal venous aneurysms presenting with DVT or PE was larger than that of those presenting without thromboembolism (3.8 cm vs 2.5 cm; P = .003). Saccular aneurysm morphology in the lower extremity was associated with thromboembolism (30% vs 9%; P = .046) and fusiform aneurysm morphology with a thrombus burden >25% (45% vs 3%). Patients presenting with thromboembolism were more likely to have had a thrombus burden >25% in their lower extremity venous aneurysm compared with those who had presented without thromboembolism (70% vs 9%). Approximately half of all the patients underwent immediate intervention, and half were managed with observation or antithrombotic regimen. In the non-operative cohort, three patients subsequently developed a DVT. Eight patients in the medically managed cohort went on to require surgical intervention. Of the 12 upper extremity venous aneurysms, none had presented with DVT or PE, and only 2 (17%) had presented with pain. Of the 66 patients in the entire cohort, 41 underwent surgical intervention. The most common indication was the absolute aneurysm size. Nine patients had undergone surgery because of a DVT or PE, and 11 for pain or extremity swelling. The most common surgery was aneurysmorrhaphy in 21 patients (53%), followed by excision and ligation in 14 patients (35%). Five patients (12%) had undergone interposition bypass grafting. A postoperative hematoma requiring reintervention was the most common complication, occurring in three popliteal vein repairs and one iliofemoral vein repair. None of the patients, treated either surgically or medically, had reported post-thrombotic complications during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Large lower extremity venous aneurysms and saccular aneurysms with thrombus >25% of the lumen are more likely to present with thromboembolic complications. Surgical intervention for lower extremity venous aneurysms is indicated to reduce the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and the need for continued anticoagulation. Popliteal aneurysms >2.5 cm and all iliofemoral aneurysms should be considered for repair. Upper extremity aneurysms do not have a significant risk of VTE and warrant treatment primarily for symptoms other than VTE.

Popliteal cysts are not a risk factor for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Popliteal cysts (PC) result from distension of the gastrocnemio-semimembranosous bursa. Published reports indicate coincident PC and deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Whether the presence of PC increase the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) remains unclear. METHODS: Lower extremity venous Duplex ultrasound (DUS) reports were evaluated across the Mayo Clinic Enterprise (Rochester, Minnesota, Jacksonville, Florida, Scottsdale, Arizona, and the Mayo Clinic Health System) in patients ≥ 18 years of age. Natural language processing (NLP) algorithms were created and validated to identify acute lower extremity DVT and PC from these reports. To determine whether there is a link between PC and lower extremity DVT, the frequency of PC among cases (ultrasounds with acute DVT) were compared to controls (ultrasounds without acute DVT). RESULTS: A total of 357,703 lower extremities venous DUS were performed in 237,052 patients (mean age 63.3 ± 16.6, 54.4% were female) between 1992 and 2021. Acute DVT was identified in 32,572 (9.1%) DUS, and PC in 32,448 (9.1%). PC were seen in a lower frequency (8.0%) of ultrasounds with acute DVT than those without (9.2%) acute DVT (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.82 to 0.89, p < 0.001). In a multivariate logistic regression model after adjusting for age, sex, and race, PCs were not positively associated with acute DVT (adjusted OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: PC are an incidental finding or an alternative diagnosis on lower extremity venous DUS, a finding that increases significantly with age. PC were not a risk factor in the development of lower extremity DVT.

A Popliteal Vein Aneurysm Accompanied by Lower Persistent Sciatic Vein.

Popliteal venous aneurysms (PVAs) are rare. Surgical treatment is recommended because of the risk of deep vein thrombosis and fatal pulmonary embolism. A persistent sciatic vein (PSV) is also a rare anomaly. We report a case of a PVA accompanied by a lower PSV. A 70-year-old man was admitted due to left leg heaviness. He had undergone ablation of both great saphenous veins 6 years prior to the admission. Duplex ultrasound showed a PVA on his left leg, which was 3.2 × 2.4 cm in size. The patient was treated with tangential aneurysmectomy with lateral venorrhaphy. His symptom gradually resolved. He received warfarin at a therapeutic range for 3 months. Duplex ultrasound at 6 months later showed no evidence of any recurrent aneurysm or venous reflux. His follow-up has revealed no complications for 18 months. Surgical treatment and perioperative therapeutic anticoagulation are recommended for treating PVAs. Tangential aneurysmectomy with venorrhaphy is the most common and the simplest surgical method.

Two New Methods of Supine Venographically Guided Popliteal Vein Puncture: A Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: Presently, the prone position is necessary for popliteal vein puncture access, but it makes the patients uncomfortable and does not allow traditional femoral or jugular access. To address these deficiencies, this study introduces two new methods, anterior and medial access carried out in the supine position. METHODS: Venous interventions with punctures in the popliteal vein of 120 limbs in 97 patients were performed during the period from February 2017 to April 2019. After puncture, venographic guidance was achieved by dorsal vein injection of contrast medium. Interventional therapy was performed after puncture and insertion of the introducer sheath. RESULTS: In all, 120 limbs were punctured in the popliteal vein, with technical success in 118 (98.3% in total) cases: 100%, 96.1%, and 100% successful punctures in, respectively, 32 anterior, 49 medial, and 37 posterior access cases. A comparison of the three groups revealed that the fluoroscopy time and duration of puncture were longer in the medial and anterior access groups than in the posterior access group. The rate of intra-operative and post-operative complications was 7.5% (9/120), with no statistically significant difference between the three access groups. Compared with the pre-operative median score of 2.5, the post-operative SVS (Society of Vascular Surgery) score of the popliteal vein was reduced to 1.5 in the anterior and 0.5 in the medial groups. CONCLUSION: Medial and anterior puncture of the popliteal vein in the supine position can be used as a safe alternative in venous endovascular therapy. The two new methods can mitigate frailty or respiratory problems resulting from the prone position and facilitate traditional femoral and jugular access.

Early Results of Popliteal Vein External Banding for Treatment of Chronic Venous Insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) encompasses a myriad of clinical manifestations including lower extremity swelling and pain, ulcerations and chronic skin changes such as stasis dermatitis, and lipodermatosclerosis. CVI effects greater than 25 million Americans and has a significant socioeconomic and psychosocial impact. Treatment of CVI varies depending on the etiology. For those patients with deep venous reflux, restoration of the deep venous valvular system is critical. Popliteal vein external banding is a novel technique to treat deep venous reflux. Our study aims to retrospectively review the early outcomes for the largest U.S. series of patients undergoing popliteal vein external banding. METHODS: Patients with C4, C5, and C6 disease with underlying deep venous reflux were treated with external banding of the popliteal vein. Basic demographic, ultrasound, and procedural data were collected. Patients were seen in clinic and underwent post procedure duplex. Procedure-specific complications were also assessed. The primary outcome was improvement of symptoms or wound healing. RESULTS: Twelve patients were identified. Seventy-five percent of patients had a history of DVT on the ipsilateral extremity and 66.7% (n = 6) of those patients had previous common or external iliac vein stenting for post-phlebitic syndrome. 58.3% of patients had active ulcerations (C6) at the time of popliteal vein banding and the mean VCSS score was 12.7, consistent with advanced venous disease. Patients were followed for a mean 8.62 months. Of the 8 patients that had active ulcers (C6), 75% completely healed with a mean time to healing of 3.3 months. 91.6% of patients reported clinical improvement in their symptoms (i.e., reduction in edema/swelling, pain or improvement in size of ulcer). Three patients had post-operative wound complications and 1 required oral antibiotic for associated cellulitis. CONCLUSION: Popliteal vein external banding represents a viable treatment modality for patients with venous insufficiency secondary to deep venous reflux. It is technically easier than most deep venous reconstructive options and may have an important role in the multimodal treatment of patients with advanced CVI.

Postpartum fever and radicular low back pain.

Fever and low back pain with radicular symptoms raise concern for epidural abscess or other neuraxial infection, especially in the context of recent epidural anesthesia. Here we present an unusual case with several confounding factors and an unexpected diagnosis.

Symptomatic bilateral massive pulmonary embolism and proximal and distal deep vein thrombosis following arthroscopic meniscus surgery: A case report.

RATIONALE: The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after knee arthroscopy is remarkably lower than that of arthroplasty. We describe a patient with symptomatic bilateral massive pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in the femoral and popliteal veins after arthroscopic meniscus repair surgery. PATIENT CONCERNS: The patient underwent arthroscopic meniscus repair with no intraoperative complication. There were no underlying diseases such as hypertension or diabetes. On day 5 postoperative, the patient complained of dyspnea, chest discomfort, and nausea after standing. DIAGNOSIS: On DVT and PTE computed tomography, there were multifocal PTEs in the distal portion of the main and segmental branches of both pulmonary arteries. There was a focal thrombosis in the left deep femoral vein, as well as small DVTs in the left popliteal and calf veins. INTERVENTIONS: After 3 days of low-molecular-weight heparin 1 mg/kg every 12 hours, treatment was changed to an oral drug, dabigatran, for 6 months. OUTCOMES: There were no PTE or DVT findings on computed tomography at 6 months postoperative. The patient did not complain of symptoms related to PTE or DVT at 6 months after the operation, has returned to work, and is living without discomfort. LESSIONS: The frequency of VTE is very low after arthroscopic meniscus surgery, but it represents a life-threatening event. Our patient had risk factors for VTE including obesity, surgery time of ∼60 minutes, and immobilization. Although arthroscopic meniscus surgery is relatively safe, evaluation of risk factors for VTE should be performed before and after surgery, and appropriate thromboprophylaxis should be provided when necessary.

Closed plication is a safe and effective method for treating popliteal vein aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Popliteal vein aneurysms are a rare vascular anomaly first reported in the 1980s. Degeneration of elastic fibers and smooth muscle cell reduction, possibly secondary to inflammation, are implicated as integral steps in the development of these aneurysms. Given the rarity of this clinical entity, significant controversy exists regarding ideal treatment strategies, including the role of observation, medical management with anticoagulation, and surgical intervention. Retrospective reviews have demonstrated a failure rate of >40% with anticoagulation alone, with patients often presenting with pulmonary embolism. This has prompted our institutional preference for surgical management once the aneurysm is identified. Surgical management involves tangential repair with lateral venorrhaphy most commonly, followed in prevalence by aneurysm resection and end-to-end anastomosis either primarily or with vein interposition. Herein, we report our results with venous plications, through both closed and open techniques. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data for 10 patients undergoing popliteal vein plication for treatment of popliteal vein aneurysms. Patient-level characteristics and operative details were examined from periprocedural and follow-up records. RESULTS: We identified 10 patients undergoing popliteal vein plication, including 9 closed plications and 1 open plication. The average aneurysm size at presentation was 2.35 ± 0.69 cm for closed plication and 4.74 cm for the one open plication. After treatment, the average popliteal vein size was significantly reduced to 1.12 ± 0.45 cm for the closed plications (P < .001 from preprocedural size) and 1.13 cm for the open plication with 100% primary patency. Average follow-up for patients treated with closed plication was 35.0 ± 25.2 months, during which seven (78%) patients had a stable, normal popliteal vein size. One patient with recurrence was diagnosed with Klippel-Trénaunay syndrome. The other had degeneration of the popliteal vein cranial to the previous repair at 39 months after the original operation that required additional plication. The open plication patient experienced a hematoma requiring washout and resulting in a transient peroneal mononeuropathy. There was one case of cellulitis after closed plication but no hematomas within this group. CONCLUSIONS: Closed plication demonstrated favorable primary patency rates and low recurrence rates, avoiding technical issues or need for early institution of systemic anticoagulation associated with tangential repair and venorrhaphy or resection methods. Closed plication represents an attractive option in patients without luminal thrombus to limit the risk of these postoperative complications and obviates the need for bypass conduit and postoperative anticoagulation.

Safety and feasibility report on nonimplantable endovenous valve formation for the treatment of deep vein reflux.

OBJECTIVE: Definitive treatment techniques for symptomatic deep venous reflux have been relegated to complex and invasive open surgery which is rarely performed today. The BlueLeaf System provides an endovenous method for the formation of deep venous valves without an implant, avoiding the complications associated with permanent foreign materials. The system has the adaptability to form valves within the femoral and popliteal veins at multiple levels in a single procedure. The aim was to determine the midterm safety and efficacy of this novel device in an early feasibility study. METHODS: Feasibility of endovenous deep venous valve formation was assessed in patients with chronic venous insufficiency (Clinical, Etiologic, Anatomic, Pathophysiologic [CEAP] 4-6). Follow-up was completed through 1 year, assessing vein patency and reflux time (RT) with duplex ultrasound examination. Venous clinical improvement was evaluated using the revised Venous Clinical Severity Scale. RESULTS: Of the 14 patients, 13 (93%) had successful formation of at least one monocuspid valve, with a mean number of 1.4 valves (range, 0-3 valves) per patient. There were no device-related serious adverse events during the index procedure. There were no deep venous thromboses reported at any time point, including 10 patients through the 1-year follow-up. In patients with at least one valve formed, site reported duplex ultrasound examination measured the average RT in the popliteal vein below valve formations, was 3.0 ± 1.0 seconds at baseline, 3.9 ± 3.1 seconds at 30 days, and 3.6 ± 2.1 seconds at 360 days. The revised Venous Clinical Severity Scale improved in all 13 successfully treated patients, decreasing from 15.0 ± 6.0 at baseline to 11.6 ± 5.5 at 30 days, 10.7 ± 5.3 at 210 days, and 9.4 ± 5.0 at 360 days (P = .0002; baseline to 360 days). Among the five patients with an ulcer who reached the 360-day follow-up visit, all (100%) healed at least one ulcer. Two patients (40%) healed all ulcers and three patients (60%) had a decrease in ulcers number but remained at C6 at 360 days. The five patients with a total of nine active ulcers at baseline had four active ulcers at 360 days. CONCLUSIONS: The BlueLeaf System holds promise as a minimally invasive means to safely form fully autogenous deep venous valves. Reconstructed deep veins remained patent, without deep venous thrombosis and symptomatic improvement was consistently observed; however, a decrease in the RT was not. Incremental device design improvements have been undertaken to improve valve function. The results of these iterations await further clinical evaluation.

Bilateral Vein Compression by Popliteal Artery Aneurisms Mimicking Post-Thrombotic Syndrome.

PURPOSE: To report a case of a 79-year-old man who presented a bilateral popliteal artery aneurysm compressing both popliteal veins mimicking signs and symptoms of post-thrombotic syndrome. CASE REPORT: A 79-year-old male patient, was seen in the ambulatory clinic with a 2-year history of bilateral leg swelling, calf pain, chronic ulceration, and hyperpigmentation. Upon physical examination, lower extremities were edematous, with a 3 cm suppurative ulcer on each leg. Image studies showed a popliteal right arterial aneurysm of maximum diameter of 41.7 mm, extrinsically compressing the ipsilateral popliteal vein. Likewise, on the left leg, a popliteal arterial aneurysm of maximum diameter of 47.9 mm was encountered triggering the same phenomenon. Bilateral endovascular treatment deploying stent grafts was auspiciously performed. At 36-months follow up, his symptoms are completely resolved, and his ulcers healed. US follow up showed exclusion of the aneurysms with progressive shrinkage of both residual sacs. CONCLUSION: Popliteal artery aneurysm compressing and constraining flow in the popliteal vein must be included as a differential diagnosis among the causes of chronic venous syndromes. Prompt diagnosis with its appropriate treatment is needed for reducing severe complications caused by PAA, such as the venous disorder our patient had.

Popliteal Venous Aneurysm With Pulmonary Embolism: A Case Report.

Popliteal venous aneurysm (PVA) is defined as an increase in the diameter of the popliteal vein, twice its normal dimension. Herein, we report a case of right PVA with severe pulmonary embolism in a 75-year-old woman who presented with sudden chest tightness and dyspnea. Clinical examination revealed hypotension and hypoxemia. Radiographic investigations revealed extensive pulmonary embolism and right fusiform PVA. Following thrombolysis, her blood pressure and oxygen saturation normalized. However, she developed right calf swelling, and angiography revealed a thrombus in the right PVA, which was managed by catheter-directed thrombolysis. Thereafter, a vascular bypass was performed using the left great saphenous vein as a conduit to treat recurrent thrombosis. Subsequent venography indicated a patent vein graft, acceptable blood flow velocity, no thrombosis residue, and no significant thrombosis. Follow-ups at 3, 6, and 12 months revealed satisfactory outcomes. In conclusion, if the systemic condition is conducive, a surgical resection and reconstruction of the popliteal vein is recommended for the treatment of PVAs.

Influence of Superficial Venous Ablation on Deep Venous Dilation and Reflux in Patients With Saphenous Varicose Veins.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the influence of superficial venous ablation on deep venous dilation and reflux in patients with saphenous varicose veins, and to elucidate the association between superficial venous reflux and deep venous morphology and hemodynamics. METHODS: The data of 154 patients with 223 limbs, who underwent endovenous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of the great saphenous vein for primary varicose veins between September 2014 and March 2016 in Eniwa Midorino Clinic, were retrospectively analyzed. Overall venous hemodynamics of the leg, including functional venous volume (VV) and venous filling index (VFI), was assessed using air-plethysmography. Saphenous and deep vein reflux and diameter were evaluated with duplex scanning. RESULTS: Hemodynamic and morphologic changes were evaluated before and 1 month after RFA. The VV and VFI were significantly decreased in postoperative values than in preoperative values (P < .001). Limbs with deep venous reflux significantly decreased postoperatively than preoperatively (P < .001). There were significant differences in the diameter of the common femoral vein (CFV) and popliteal vein (PV) between the preoperative and postoperative values (P < .001). There were strong to moderate correlations between the VV and the diameter of the CFV or PV (CFV, r = 0.47, P < .001; PV, r = 0.35, P < .001), while there were moderate to weak correlations between the VFI and the diameter of the CFV or PV (CFV, r = 0.23, P < .001; PV, r = 0.33, P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Superficial venous ablation significantly reduced deep venous dilation and reflux in patients with saphenous varicose veins. Significant correlations existed between the VV or VFI, which reflected superficial venous reflux, and the diameter of the deep veins. These findings reveal that volume overload due to superficial venous reflux is associated with deep venous morphology and hemodynamics.

Anatomical Considerations of Infrageniculate Popliteal Artery Puncture: Alternative Pathway for Retrograde Access After Failed Re-entry.

BACKGROUND: A distal approach in endovascular procedures for revascularization of lowers limbs can be considered in case of no re-entry in subintimal recanalization. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of a medial approach to the infrageniculate popliteal artery (IPA) using existing computed tomography (CT) scan simulation and punctures performed on cadavers. METHODS AND RESULTS: CT angiographies of lower extremities were used to simulate IPA puncture and puncture trajectory. Tissues damaged during the trajectory between the puncture site and the access-related injuries were analyzed. Anatomical punctures on cadaverous model were also performed. Corpses were placed in supine position, the hip in slight flexion (40°) and abduction (external rotation of 60°). A 16 G needle was used for the IPA puncture. Twelve CT angiography simulations were made. Of these 12 simulations, 9 revealed an isolated lesion of the popliteal vein and 2 isolated lesions of the tibial nerve. A lesion of the tibial nerve and the popliteal vein on the same simulation was once observed. Damage to the medial gastrocnemius muscle could not be avoided in each case. Ten punctures were performed on cadavers with technical success. There were 6 popliteal vein lesions, 3 tibial nerve lesions, and 1 case without lesion. In all cases, damage to the medial gastrocnemius muscle was seen. CONCLUSIONS: This medial approach was feasible and is accompanied by trauma of elements of the popliteal pedicle. Preoperative CT angiography could anticipate best site of puncture and potential access-related injury.

Relationship between the site of thrombosis and the prevalence of pulmonary embolism in acute lower extremity deep venous thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: Lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (LEDVT) is common and can lead to pulmonary embolism (PE). Currently, the mechanism of how LEDVT causes PE is unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between the thrombus sites and PE in LEDVT patients. METHODS: A retrospective study that included the medical data of 3101 patients aged >18 years who were diagnosed with LEDVT by duplex ultrasound was performed at The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from 2008 to 2017. The clinical information of the patients was collected. According to the thrombosis sites, the patients were divided into three groups. We determined the cumulative prevalence and prevalence rate of PE between the groups and used Cox proportional hazard regression models, which were stratified on matched sets, to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) for all of the outcomes of interest. We focused on the relationship of proximal or isolated distal LEDVT with PE and also analyzed the relationship of the left side or right side of LEDVT with PE. RESULTS: A total of 1629 (52.5%) patients had left LEDVT (group 1), 912 (29.4%) patients had right LEDVT (group 2), and 560 (18.1%) patients had bilateral LEDVT (group 3). The rate of PE was higher in group 2 than in group 1, although there were more patients suffering from LEDVT in group 1 than in group 2 (P < .001). The patients with proximal LEDVT in group 3 exhibited a greater risk of PE compared with those with isolated distal LEDVT (adjusted HR, 2.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-5.49). We also observed that the proportion of patients with proximal LEDVT who were receiving treatment was much higher than that of patients with distal LEDVT (P < .05). The patients with right LEDVT had a higher risk of PE than the patients with left LEDVT (adjusted HR, 1.60; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-2.21), and the patients with right LEDVT had more comorbidities, such as malignant neoplasms, hypertension, and diabetes (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with proximal bilateral LEDVT had a higher likelihood for development of PE than did patients with distal LEDVT, which may be associated with inadequate therapy for proximal bilateral LEDVT. PE was more likely to develop with right-sided LEDVT because these patients had more comorbidities in our study.

Analysis of patent, unstented lower extremity vein segment diameters in 266 patients with venous disease.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to characterize the average maximum diameters of widely patent lower extremity vein segments in patients with underlying venous disease and the demographic factors that affect these diameters. METHODS: Maximum axial diameters of each deep vein segment from the diaphragm to the knee were measured from computed tomography venography studies for all patients who underwent venous stent placement during a 20-year period at a single quaternary venous referral institution. Limbs containing only widely patent, unstented vein segments without variant anatomy were identified for inclusion. The final analysis involved diameter measurements from 870 imaging studies of 266 patients. Multivariate linear regression was used to identify factors associated with vein segment diameters. RESULTS: Average vein segment diameters ranged from 7.8 mm for the left and right femoral veins to 27.9 mm for the long axis of the suprarenal inferior vena cava. Multivariate linear regression demonstrated that women had larger IVC, common iliac vein, and external iliac vein diameters, whereas men had larger common femoral veins. Laterality, height, weight, and sex also had statistically significant associations with the diameters of select vein segments. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an estimate of the average diameters of widely patent deep vein segments in the lower extremities from the diaphragm to the knees in patients with underlying venous disease and characterizes covariates that significantly affect vein diameter. These findings may help interventionalists better select devices for endovascular intervention.