Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 100
Filtrar
1.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 51(11): 659-667, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37852891

RESUMO

This 3-year prospective study evaluated the efficacy of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) arthrocentesis with viscosupplementation in different severity stages based on the Dimitroulis classification (categories 2-4 were included). TMJ arthrocentesis was performed under local anaesthesia, and the protocol consisted of a double-puncture technique with lavage of ≥150 cc Ringer Lactate plus viscosupplementation. Incobotulinum toxin A was administered 10-15 days preoperatively in patients with concomitant masticatory myalgia. The primary outcome was TMJ pain, assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS, 0-10), and the secondary outcomes were the maximum mouth opening (MMO, mm) and myalgia degree (0-3). All outcomes were assessed on the intervention day (T0) and after the procedure (T1) (minimum 1 month and then 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and every year since). A total of 108 patients were enrolled (mean age of 43.1 ± 18.9 years); 86 (80%) were women and 22 (20%) were men. Preoperative pain was 4.02 ± 3.12 (mean ± SD), MMO was 38.10 ± 9.56 (mean ± SD) and myalgia degree was 1.80 ± 1.18 (mean ± SD). After an average of 215.4 days (31-1253 days), a statistically significant improvement of pain (P < 0.0001), MMO (P = 0.005) and myalgia degree (P < 0.0001) was observed. The overall successful outcome of TMJ arthrocentesis with viscosupplementation was 76%. The authors observed increased arthrocentesis effectiveness and success rate with viscosupplementation in Dimitroulis category 2 (88.6%) compared to 3-4 (71.4%). An association was found between arthrocentesis with viscosupplementation failure and painful myalgia (ρ = 0.477; P < 0.0001). Thirteen patients (12%) underwent a second TMJ intervention after finalising the present trial. With a low complication rate, TMJ arthrocentesis with viscosupplementation led to an overall benefit for all the included patients. This study reinforces the important role of minimally invasive TMJ arthrocentesis as a first treatment option, with better results in the early stages compared to more severe stages.


Assuntos
Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular , Viscossuplementação , Masculino , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Artrocentese/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/cirurgia , Mialgia , Punções
2.
RFO UPF ; 28(1)20230808. ilus
Artigo em Português | LILACS, BBO - Odontologia | ID: biblio-1516306

RESUMO

Objetivo: Apresentar as modalidades de tratamentos conservadoras e minimamente invasivas mais usadas disponíveis no arsenal terapêutico das desordens temporomandibulares (DTM). Revisão da literatura: Os objetivos do tratamento invariavelmente incluem redução da dor, diminuição das atividades parafuncionais e restauração da função. Dentre as alternativas conservadoras e minimamente invasivas, podemos citar os dispositivos interoclusais, exercícios terapêuticos, eletrofototermoterapia, agulhamento seco e infiltração de anestésicos locais em pontos gatilho, injeção de sangue autógeno para controle da luxação mandibular, terapia cognitivo comportamental, toxina botulínica, viscossuplementação, controle farmacológico da dor aguda e crônica. As DTMs afetam uma proporção significativa da população. Somente após o fracasso das opções não invasivas é que devem ser iniciados tratamentos mais invasivos e irreversíveis. No entanto, algumas condições, como a anquilose e neoplasias, por exemplo, são essencialmente tratadas cirurgicamente e tentativas de tratamentos conservadores podem trazer piora na qualidade de vida ou risco de morte. Considerações finais: Uma abordagem de equipe multidisciplinar para o manejo é essencial no cuidado fundamental de todos os pacientes com DTM, para que o tratamento possa ser especificamente adaptado às necessidades individuais do paciente.


Aim: To present the most widely used conservative and minimally invasive treatment modalities available in the therapeutic arsenal for temporomandibular disorders (TMD). Literature review: Treatment goals invariably include pain reduction, reduction of parafunctional activities and restoration of function. Among the conservative and minimally invasive alternatives, we can mention interocclusal devices, therapeutic exercises, electrophototherapy, dry needling and infiltration of local anesthetics in trigger points, autogenous blood injection to control mandibular dislocation, cognitive behavioral therapy, botulinum toxin, viscosupplementation, pharmacological control of acute and chronic pain. TMD affects a considerable proportion of the population. Only after non-invasive options have failed should more invasive and irreversible treatments be initiated. However, some conditions, such as ankylosis and neoplasms, for example, are treated surgically and attempts at conservative treatments can lead to worsening quality of life or risk of death. Conclusions: A multidisciplinary team approach to management is essential in the fundamental care of all TMD patients, so that treatment can be specifically tailored to the patient's individual needs.


Assuntos
Humanos , Dor Facial/terapia , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/terapia , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/fisiopatologia , Placas Oclusais , Viscossuplementação/métodos , Tratamento Conservador/métodos , Agulhamento Seco/métodos
3.
Am J Sports Med ; 51(9): 2487-2497, 2023 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35971803

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is a cohort of patients in whom hip preservation surgery is not indicated, because they have developed signs of early osteoarthritis (OA), and nor can they have a hip replacement, as they are too early in the disease process. Management of this cohort of patients is not standardised and both pharmacological and nonpharmacological measures are utilised to reduce pain. Interventions available for early OA include intra-articular injections of steroids, viscosupplementation and more recently platelet-rich plasma (PRP). However, the use of PRP in hip OA has not yet been studied systematically. PURPOSE: To assess intra-articular PRP as a therapeutic intervention for hip OA, including the duration of efficacy, influence of dose and composition of PRP, and the incidence of adverse effects. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: We performed literature searches on the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, WEB OF SCIENCE, COCHRANE, and SCOPUS databases, and the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines were followed. Data were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. We assessed the quality of the included studies using the methodological index for non-randomized studies instrument, with an additional assessment for randomized controlled trials with the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials. This is the first study to concisely collate the available data on the use of PRP in hip OA. RESULTS: Eight studies were included in the analysis, with data from a total of 331 patients. PRP significantly reduced pain compared with the baseline at multiple time points, with the greatest effect at the 1- to 2-month follow-up, but PRP significantly improved function only at the 1- to 2-month follow-up. A significantly larger reduction in pain was achieved with a single injection of PRP compared with multiple injections, a total injected dose of PRP <15 mL compared with ≥15 mL, and use of a leukocyte-poor PRP preparation compared with leukocyte-rich PRP. There were no lasting adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Low- and moderate-quality evidence suggests that PRP reduces pain and improves function at the end-point follow-up of studies compared with the baseline. Moderate-quality evidence suggests that a larger reduction in pain is achieved with a single injection of PRP compared with multiple injections, and low-quality evidence attributes a larger reduction of pain with a total injected dose of PRP <15 mL compared with ≥15 mL and using leukocyte-poor PRP compared with leukocyte-rich PRP.


Assuntos
Osteoartrite do Quadril , Osteoartrite do Joelho , Plasma Rico em Plaquetas , Viscossuplementação , Humanos , Osteoartrite do Quadril/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Dor/etiologia , Injeções Intra-Articulares/efeitos adversos , Osteoartrite do Joelho/complicações , Ácido Hialurônico/uso terapêutico
4.
J. bras. econ. saúde (Impr.) ; 14(Suplemento 2)20220800.
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS, ECOS | ID: biblio-1412749

RESUMO

Objective: To evaluate the micro-costing of viscosupplementation procedures compared to different infiltration regimens. Methods: This study compared, through the Time-Driven ActivityBased Costing method, the micro-costing of these different application regimens using national cost averages as a basis for calculation in a medium-sized outpatient service. Results: The results demonstrated that the difference in costs with the single application is 31.47% less for three and 119.13% for five applications. Conclusions: No study showed a superiority of the five-application regimen over the three-application regimen, which leads one to believe that there is no justification for this procedure from an economic or quality-of-life point of view.


Objective: Avaliar o microcusteio dos procedimentos de viscossuplementação do joelho em diferentes regimes de aplicação. Métodos: Este estudo comparou, por meio do método Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing, o microcusteio desses diferentes regimes de aplicação, usando com base de cálculo médias nacionais de custo em um serviço ambulatorial de porte médio. Resultados: Os resultados encontrados demonstraram que a diferença nos custos com a aplicação única é 31,47% menor para três aplicações e 119,13% para cinco aplicações. Conclusão: Em nenhum estudo houve superioridade do regime de cinco aplicações ao regime de três, fato que leva a acreditar que não há nenhuma justificativa para esse procedimento do ponto de vista econômico ou de qualidade de vida do paciente.


Assuntos
Osteoartrite , Alocação de Custos , Viscossuplementação
5.
Eur J Pharm Biopharm ; 177: 39-49, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35691537

RESUMO

Polymer-based formulations present an attractive strategy in intraarticular drug-delivery to refrain biologicals from early leakage from the joint. In this study, co-formulations of hyaluronic acid and polyvinylpyrrolidone were investigated for their potential as viscosupplements and their influence on the transsynovial loss of adalimumab. For this purpose, polymer mixtures were evaluated for their viscosity and elasticity behavior while their influence on the permeation of adalimumab across a porcine ex-vivo synovial membrane was determined. Hyaluronic acid showed strong shear thinning behavior and exhibited high viscosity and elasticity at low motions, while combinations with polyvinylpyrrolidone provided absorption and stiffness at high mechanical stress, so that they can potentially restore the rheological properties of the synovial fluid over the range of joint motion. In addition, the formulations showed significant influence on transsynovial permeation kinetics of adalimumab and hyaluronic acid, which could be decelerated up to 5- and 3-fold, respectively. Besides viscosity effects, adalimumab was retained primarily by an electrostatic interaction with hyaluronic acid, as detected by isothermal calibration calorimetry. Furthermore, polymer-mediated stabilization of the antibody activity was detected. In summary, hyaluronic acid - polyvinylpyrrolidone combinations can be efficiently used to prolong the residence of adalimumab in the joint cavity while simultaneously supplying viscosupplementation.


Assuntos
Viscossuplementação , Adalimumab , Animais , Ácido Hialurônico/química , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Povidona , Suínos , Viscossuplementos/química
6.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord ; 23(1): 32, 2022 Jan 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34983471

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of viscosupplementation after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy. METHOD: A randomized controlled trial of 47 patients who underwent arthroscopic partial meniscectomy was conducted between March 2020 and March 2021. Patients were randomized into two groups: a viscosupplementation group (n = 23) and a control group (n = 24). A single-dose intraarticular hyaluronic acid injection was used as viscosupplementation. The 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain assessment was measured at baseline and at 1 day, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months post-surgery. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Tegner, Lysholm, and Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores and range of motion (ROM) of the knee were measured at baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months. RESULTS: The 100 mm VAS score for pain was significantly lower in the viscosupplementation group at 2 weeks post-surgery (27.5 mm vs. 40.7 mm, P = 0.047). ROM was significantly greater in the viscosupplementation group than in the control group at 2 weeks (131.5° vs. 121.0°, P = 0.044) post-surgery. No significant differences were observed in the IKDC or in the Tegner, Lysholm, and WOMAC scores between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Viscosupplementation after arthroscopic partial meniscectomy significantly reduced pain at 2 weeks post-surgery and improved ROM of the knee at 2 weeks post-surgery. There might be some benefits in terms of pain and functional recovery of viscosupplementation after arthroscopic surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This randomized controlled trial was registered at cris.nih.go.kr # KCT0004921 .


Assuntos
Osteoartrite do Joelho , Viscossuplementação , Artroscopia , Humanos , Articulação do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Meniscectomia/efeitos adversos , Osteoartrite do Joelho/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoartrite do Joelho/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 30(12): 3958-3967, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34767030

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose of this double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to compare clinical improvement and radiographic findings up to 2 years of follow-up of a single intra-articular injection of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) versus hyaluronic acid (HA) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). The hypothesis was that BMAC injection could lead to better clinical and radiographic results compared to viscosupplementation. METHODS: Patients with bilateral knee OA were randomized to one intra-articular injection of tibial-derived BMAC in one knee and one HA injection in the contralateral knee. Sixty patients were enrolled, and 56 were studied up to the final follow-up (35 men, 21 women, mean age 57.8 ± 8.9 years), for a total of 112 knees. Patients were evaluated before the injection and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months with the IKDC subjective score, VAS for pain, and the KOOS score. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID), patient treatment judgement, and adverse events were documented, as well as bilateral X-Rays (Rosenberg view) before and after treatment. RESULTS: No severe adverse events nor differences were reported in terms of mild adverse events (7.1% vs 5.4%, p = ns) and treatment failures (10.7% vs 12.5%, p = ns) in BMAC and HA groups, respectively. The IKDC subjective score improved from baseline to all follow-ups for BMAC (p < 0.0005), while it improved up to 12 months (p < 0.0005) and then decreased at 24 months (p = 0.030) for HA. Compared to HA, BMAC showed a higher improvement for VAS pain at 12 (2.2 ± 2.6 vs 1.7 ± 2.5, p = 0.041) and 24 months (2.2 ± 2.6 vs 1.4 ± 2.8, p = 0.002). The analysis based on OA severity confirmed this difference only in Kellgren-Lawrence 1-2 knees, while comparable results were observed in moderate/severe OA. Radiographic evaluation did not show knee OA deterioration for both treatment groups, without intergroup differences. CONCLUSION: BMAC did not demonstrate a clinically significant superiority at short-term compared to viscosupplementation, reporting overall comparable results in terms of clinical scores, failures, adverse events, radiographic evaluation, MCID achievement, and patient treatment judgment. However, while HA results decreased over time, BMAC presented more durable results in mild OA knees. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.


Assuntos
Osteoartrite do Joelho , Viscossuplementação , Masculino , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Viscossuplementação/métodos , Osteoartrite do Joelho/tratamento farmacológico , Seguimentos , Medula Óssea , Resultado do Tratamento , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Ácido Hialurônico/uso terapêutico , Dor/tratamento farmacológico
8.
Artrosc. (B. Aires) ; 29(1): 14-21, 2022.
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1369635

RESUMO

Objetivos: La osteoartrosis (OA) es una artropatía incurable mono o poliarticular. En la rodilla es la enfermedad degenerativa más común, con gran incidencia de los factores mecánicos. El arsenal terapéutico para el manejo de la OA de rodilla (OAR) comprende medidas no farmacológicas, farmacológicas, medicación de técnicas intraarticulares y cirugía. Los objetivos de este trabajo fueron evaluar la eficacia en términos de dolor, función articular y calidad de vida de los pacientes infiltrados con ácido hialurónico (AH) de alto peso molecular (PM), doblemente reticulado (Cientific Synovial®, en adelante: CS) así como la seguridad de su uso. Adicionalmente se intentó objetivar el tiempo libre de prótesis en pacientes con esta indicación. Materiales y métodos: Se efectuó un diseño pre y post (un solo grupo) para pacientes con gonartrosis. Se analizó una muestra de cuarenta y seis pacientes (n = 46) a quienes se dividió en dos grupos según clasificación de Kellgren-Lawrence (KL). Un grupo KL 1­2 fue infiltrado con AH 40 mg (CS40), y otro grupo KL 3­4 fue infiltrado con AH 60 mg (CS60). A todos los pacientes se les suministró el cuestionario KOOS-12 (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) pre y postinfiltración y se efectuó estadística descriptiva e inferencial apropiada. Conclusiones: el AH de alto PM y doblemente reticulado (Cientific Synovial®) mejoró estadística y clínicamente todos los parámetros de eficacia analizados por medio del cuestionario KOOS-12. El preparado se mostró seguro y sin aparición de efectos adversos de relevancia. Tanto en los pacientes con indicación previa de reemplazo total de rodilla (RTR) rechazada (n = 12) como en el resto de los pacientes de la muestra se verificó la supervivencia libre de prótesis hasta el final del estudio


Objectives: Osteoarthrosis (OA) is an incurable mono or polyarticular arthropathy and in the knee it is the most common degenerative disease with a high incidence of mechanical factors. The therapeutic arsenal for the management of knee OA (OAR) includes non-pharmacological and pharmacological measures, medication and intra-articular techniques, and surgery. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy in terms of pain, joint function and quality of life of patients infiltrated with double cross-linked high molecular weight (MW) hyaluronic acid (HA) (Cientific Synovial®, ­CS­) as well as the safety of its use. Additionally, we tried to objectify the prosthesis-free time in patients with this indication. Materials and methods: a pre - post design (single group) was carried out for patients with knee osteoarthritis. A sample of fortysix patients (n = 46) was analyzed who were divided into two groups according to the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) classification. A group KL 1­2 was infiltrated with HA 40 mg (CS40) and another group KL 3­4 was infiltrated with HA 60 mg (CS60). All patients filled out the KOOS-12 questionnaire (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) pre and post infiltration and appropriate descriptive and inferential statistics were performed. Conclusions: The double-crosslinked, high-MW HA (Cientific Synovial®) improved statistically and clinically all the efficacy parameters analyzed using the KOOS-12 questionnaire. The preparation was shown to be safe and without the appearance of significant adverse effects. Both in the patients with a previous indication for total knee replacement (TKR) rejected (n = 12), as in the rest of the patients in the sample, prosthesis-free survival was verified until the end of the study


Assuntos
Resultado do Tratamento , Osteoartrite do Joelho/terapia , Viscossuplementação , Ácido Hialurônico/uso terapêutico
9.
Ortop Traumatol Rehabil ; 23(3): 229-238, 2021 Jun 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34190048

RESUMO

The discovery of unique properties of the hyaluronic acid and learning about the role of this aid in pathophysiology of extracellular matrices resulted in using this substance in pharmacological support in cases of tissue dysfunction due to numerous disease units. Therefore, the products containing this substance are now widely used in medicine including dermatology and aesthetic medicine, ophthalmology, facial-mandibular surgery and orthopedics, being among the most effective products used in the treatment of numerous cases of function impairment and deformation of tissues and organs. There are applied in both post-traumatic and post-inflammatory conditions as well as in symptoms due to chronic conditions. Their therapeutic effects result from joint surface moisturizing, reduction of the coefficient of friction (COF) and good bio-tolerance and biocompatibility confirmed by a low percentage of side effects and biocompatibility. The introduction of hyaluronic acid hybrid complexes with high and low molecular mass (H/L-HA) has increased the clinical usefulness of hyaluronic acid products thanks to their increased viscoelasticity, increased anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective properties and thermodynamic stabilization of the product guaranteeing its half-life. Thanks to the above mentioned pro-perties it becomes more effective in the non-surgical treatment of osteoarthritis.


Assuntos
Osteoartrite , Viscossuplementação , Humanos , Ácido Hialurônico/uso terapêutico , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Osteoartrite/tratamento farmacológico , Viscossuplementos/uso terapêutico
10.
J. oral res. (Impresa) ; 10(2): 1-10, abr. 30, 2021. ilus, tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1382212

RESUMO

Objetive: The degenerative diseases of the tempo-romandibular joint (TMJ) are characterized by a progressive destruction of the articular tissues of the condyle and the glenoid fossa. The main aim of this review is to describe the effectiveness of the hyaluronic acid (HA) in the treatment of degenerative diseases of the TMJ in accordance with the available scientific evidence. Material and Methods: A literature search was made in the following databases EBSCO, Pubmed, Cochraneand Trip Database, using the keywords hyaluronic, hyaluronan, NaH, hyaluronate, TMJ, TMD, CMD, craniomandibular, orofacial pain and temporomandibular. There were no date or language restrictions applied. Results: After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 14 studies were included in this review (11 randomized controlled clinical trials and 3 non-randomized clinical trials). Conclusion: The studies reported a decrease in pain and improvement in functional parameters after treatment of TMJ osteoarthritis with HA . The use of arthrocentesis associated with the administration of HA provides effects synergistic, reaching a superiority the protocols with multiple injections with respect to those of a single session. The adverse effects related to the injection of HA with or without associated arthrocentesis were minor and transitory.


Resumen: Objetivo: Las enfermedades degenerativas de la articulación temporomandibular (ATM) se caracterizan por una destrucción progresiva de tejidos articulares en el cóndilo y la fosa glenoidea. El objetivo principal de esta revisión es describir la efectividad del uso de ácido hialurónico en el tratamiento de enfermedades degenerativas de la articulación temporomandibular de acuerdo con la evidencia científica disponible. Material y Métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda de la literatura en las bases de datos electrónicas EBSCO, PubMed, Cochrane y Trip Database, utilizando las palabras claves hyaluronic, hyaluronan, NaH, hyaluronate, tmj, tmd, cmd, craniomandibular, orofacial pain y temporomandibular, sin límite de fecha ni de idioma hasta Mayo del año 2020, complementada con una búsqueda retrógrada. Resultados: Con base en los criterios de inclusión y exclusión, 14 estudios fueron incluidos en esta revisión (11 ensayos clínicos controlados aleatorizados y 3 ensayos clínicos controlados no aleatorizados). Conclusión: Los estudios reportaron una disminución del dolor y mejora en los parámetros funcionales luego del tratamiento de osteoartritis de la ATM con AH. El uso de artrocentesis asociada a la administración del AH provee efectos sinérgicos, alcanzando una superioridad los protocolos con múltiples inyecciones con respecto a aquellos de una sola sesión. Los efectos adversos relacionados con la inyección de AH con o sin artrocentesis asociada fueron menores y transitorios.


Assuntos
Humanos , Osteoartrite/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/tratamento farmacológico , Ácido Hialurônico/administração & dosagem , Dor Facial , Viscossuplementação , Artrocentese
11.
Curr Opin Ophthalmol ; 32(3): 288-293, 2021 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33630788

RESUMO

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: After removing the native vitreous during vitreoretinal surgery, an adequate substitute is required to ensure homeostasis of the eye. Current clinically used endotamponades (silicone oil, gases, semifluorinated alkanes) are effective in promoting retinal reattachment, but lead to complications such as emulsification, prolonged inflammation, blurred vision, raised intraocular pressure, cataract formation or the need for revision surgery. The aim of this review is to provide an update on novel vitreous substitutes with a focus on polymer-based systems. RECENT FINDINGS: Polymeric hydrogels provide favourable properties such as high water content, optical transparency, suitable refractive indices and densities, adjustable rheological properties, injectability, biocompatibility and their ability to tamponade the retina via viscosity and swelling pressure, comparable to the native human vitreous body. Here, vitreous replacement strategies can be divided into chemically or physically crosslinked hydrogel systems that are applied as preformed or in-situ gelling matrices. SUMMARY: Several hydrogel-based vitreous substitutes have already been positively evaluated in preclinical tests and have the potential to enter the clinical phase soon.


Assuntos
Hidrogéis/química , Viscossuplementos/química , Cirurgia Vitreorretiniana , Corpo Vítreo , Materiais Biocompatíveis/análise , Tamponamento Interno , Humanos , Polímeros/química , Viscossuplementação
12.
J Knee Surg ; 34(8): 886-897, 2021 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31874465

RESUMO

Hylan G-F 20 viscosupplementation can be used to treat knee osteoarthritis pain. This study evaluated time to knee arthroplasty (KA), KA risk factors, and health care resource utilization in patients aged ≥18 years with claims in the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart database (2006-2016) for knee osteoarthritis treated with at least one course of hylan G-F 20. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated KA risk from osteoarthritis diagnosis and first hylan G-F 20 treatment. KA risk factors were determined using multivariate Cox regression. Among 62,033 patients treated with hylan G-F 20 and/or hylan G-F 20 single intra-articular injection, 60 to 64% did not undergo KA 8 years following first injection. KA risk factors from time of osteoarthritis diagnosis and first hylan G-F 20 treatment were similar: increased age, fewer comorbidities, fewer hylan G-F 20 treatments, female sex, and no ultrasound/fluoroscopy for injection guidance. Patients who underwent KA versus those who did not had more office visits and claims for opioids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and physical therapy. Patients less likely to undergo KA were younger (<40 years), had more comorbidities, received more courses of hylan G-F 20, were males, or received ultrasound/fluoroscopic injection guidance. Patients who did not receive KA versus those who did used fewer health care resources.


Assuntos
Artroplastia do Joelho/métodos , Ácido Hialurônico/análogos & derivados , Osteoartrite do Joelho/cirurgia , Dor/etiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Ácido Hialurônico/administração & dosagem , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Articulação do Joelho/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Viscossuplementação/métodos , Adulto Jovem
13.
Clinics ; 76: e2840, 2021. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1249590

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Arthrocentesis is the simplest surgical intervention for the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). It can be performed on an outpatient basis at a low cost and with low morbidity. The objective is to release the articular disc by disrupting the adhesion formed between its surfaces and the mandibular fossa through hydraulic pressure generated by irrigation of the upper compartment of the TMJ. Viscosupplementation with hyaluronic acid during or after arthrocentesis improves clinical outcomes, increases mouth opening, and reduces pain levels. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiency of arthrocentesis plus hyaluronic acid viscosupplementation through clinical examination and preoperative magnetic resonance imaging in patients with unilateral disc displacement without reduction (DDwoR). METHODS: This analytical retrospective cross-sectional study clinically and radiologically evaluated 72 patients of both sexes with unilateral DDwoR. The following data were collected: sex, pain, age, duration of pain, maximum mouth opening, and patient pain perception on a visual analog scale. TMJ arthrocentesis was performed only once for each of the indicated joints. Data were collected before arthrocentesis (baseline) and at 7, 14, 30, 60, 90, and 180 days after the procedure (final evaluation). RESULTS: Between the baseline and final evaluation, there was a significant reduction in pain (p=0.001) and restoration of articular function. In addition, there was a significant increase in maximum mouth opening (p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with DDwoR undergoing arthrocentesis combined with hyaluronic acid injection showed significant improvement in the perceived pain and maximum mouth opening in the mid-term follow-up periods.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Luxações Articulares , Viscossuplementação , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Resultado do Tratamento , Disco da Articulação Temporomandibular , Artrocentese
14.
Carbohydr Polym ; 248: 116787, 2020 Nov 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32919575

RESUMO

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic disease affecting joint functionality and often managed with hyaluronic acid (HA) administration. In this study, a hydrogel based on a lactose-modified chitosan (CTL) reticulated with boric acid has been developed as a viscosupplement for OA treatment. The rheological characterization allowed to identify a composition whose properties were in line with those of commercial products (in the order of tens of Pascal). The selected CTL-hydrogel showed biocompatibility and antioxidant activity in vitro, and it did not influence cytokines release by macrophages. Degradation studies carried out over 24 h pointed out its higher resistance to chemical degradation with respect to HA samples. Overall, this study underlines the advantages of the CTL-hydrogel to address the treatment of OA and shed light on an innovative application of CTL polymer, which is one of the main component of the proposed hydrogel system and not used in mixture with other molecules.


Assuntos
Quitosana/química , Citocinas/metabolismo , Hidrogéis/farmacologia , Lactose/química , Macrófagos/efeitos dos fármacos , Osteoartrite/prevenção & controle , Viscossuplementação/métodos , Animais , Células Cultivadas , Humanos , Hidrogéis/química , Interleucina-10/metabolismo , Macrófagos/metabolismo , Osteoartrite/metabolismo , Suínos , Fator de Necrose Tumoral alfa/metabolismo , Células U937 , Viscossuplementos/química , Viscossuplementos/farmacologia
15.
Arthroscopy ; 36(12): 3072-3078, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32721546

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To examine the cost-effectiveness of a series (total of 3 injections) of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in comparison to that of hyaluronic acid (HA) viscosupplementation for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: Outcome data regarding the use of PRP or HA injections for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis were determined from the highest-quality data (Level I) available in the literature until 2015. Health utility values were then derived from these high-quality data. Costs were determined by examining typical charges for patients undergoing a series of either PRP or HA injections for the treatment of this condition at a large private orthopaedic practice. These health utility values and costs were used to create an expected-value decision analysis model. RESULTS: The results of the model revealed that the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of a series of PRP injections was $8,635.23/QALY and that of a series of HA injections was $5,331.75/QALY. A series of PRP injections was associated with a higher initial cost than a series of HA injections (difference, $1,433.67); however, PRP was also more effective (higher utility value) than HA by 0.11 QALYs (0.69 vs 0.58, P = .0062) at 1 year. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the use of PRP injections as opposed to HA was $12,628.15/QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Although a series of either PRP ($8,635.23/QALY) or HA ($5,331.75/QALY) injections for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis would be considered cost-effective (cost per QALY < $50,000), PRP injections were not more cost-effective than HA injections. However, PRP was significantly more effective at 1 year, and being associated with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $12,628.15/QALY when compared with HA, a series of PRP injections should be considered a reasonable and acceptable alternative to HA injections for the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, economic and decision analysis of Level I studies.


Assuntos
Ácido Hialurônico/administração & dosagem , Osteoartrite do Joelho/terapia , Plasma Rico em Plaquetas , Viscossuplementos/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Injeções Intra-Articulares/economia , Masculino , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento , Viscossuplementação/métodos
16.
Acta Biomed ; 91(14-S): e2020032, 2020 12 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33559627

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK: Osteoarthritis is the most common cause of disability in elderly. Hip osteoarthritis is the second most frequent form affecting a large joint and the social and economic impact on society of its related disability is expected to increase. The purpose of this study was to verify the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided viscosupplementation with high weight hyaluronic acid in hip osteoarthritis. METHODS: 183 patients with painful hip OA (Kellgren-Lawrence 1-2-3) were treated from January 2014 to December 2016 with viscosupplementation. Patients were evaluated before injection (T0) and after 1,2,3,4 years through the VAS scale and Harris Hip Score (HHS). Patients who underwent to subsequent injections were followed and assessed. Subjects who underwent prosthesis were analyzed for a minimum of 6 months in order to detect any early postoperative complication. RESULTS: The mean improvement of HHS and VAS between T0 and T1 was statistically significant. Patients who underwent subsequent injections showed a higher improvement even if statistical significance was not observed. Results showed that patients with grade 2 of osteoarthritis had the higher change in the scores. No adverse effects were registered. No early complications were reported in those patients who needed prosthesis. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Results observed confirm that ultrasound-guided viscosupplementation with high weight hyaluronic acid could be a possibility in the treatment of hip osteoarthritis, especially in patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 of disease. Subsequent injections are not characterized by similar positive effects. Outcomes of prosthetic surgery are not influenced by viscosupplementation.


Assuntos
Osteoartrite do Quadril , Viscossuplementação , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Seguimentos , Humanos , Ácido Hialurônico/uso terapêutico , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Osteoartrite do Quadril/tratamento farmacológico , Medição da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
J Ultrasound Med ; 39(1): 113-117, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31237389

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Viscosupplementation, intra-articular injection of hyaluronic acid (HA), for knee osteoarthritis has fallen somewhat out of favor, with studies failing to show consistent benefits in pain reduction. Hyaluronic acid must enter the joint space to be beneficial; however, landmark-guided injection can be substantially inaccurate, especially in obese patients. We aimed to determine whether ultrasound (US) guidance to ensure needle placement for HA knee injection resulted in improved outcomes as reflected by surgery-free survival compared to landmark-guided HA knee injection. METHODS: All community-dwelling patients in 6 contiguous surrounding counties receiving HA knee injection either by landmark guidance (n = 647) or by US guidance (n = 500) were analyzed for the degree of arthritis, body mass index, follow-up injection, and subsequent need for knee arthroplasty. A subgroup analysis of obese patients was also performed. RESULTS: The US- and landmark-guided HA injection cohorts were similar with respect to sex, body mass index, and the degree of arthritis. Of 1147 patients receiving knee HA injection, 462 subsequently underwent knee arthroplasty. Significantly fewer patients in the US-guided HA injection cohort went to surgery (33.2%) compared to the landmark-guided cohort (45.8%; P < .001). The subgroup analysis for obese patients showed even larger differences (34.8% versus 51.8%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Knee osteoarthritis treatment by viscosupplementation can be optimized by US guidance, ensuring intra-articular needle placement. Using an objective surgical outcome, our study shows that rethinking viscosupplementation to ensure intra-articular delivery improves effectiveness. Patients receiving US-guided knee HA injection were significantly less likely to undergo subsequent knee arthroplasty than patients receiving landmark-guided HA injection.


Assuntos
Ácido Hialurônico/administração & dosagem , Osteoartrite do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteoartrite do Joelho/tratamento farmacológico , Ultrassonografia/métodos , Viscossuplementação/métodos , Viscossuplementos/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Ácido Hialurônico/uso terapêutico , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Articulação do Joelho/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos , Viscossuplementos/uso terapêutico
18.
Adv Rheumatol ; 60: 26, 2020. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1130806

RESUMO

Abstract Background: Injection of Hylan G-F20 (HY) into joints may provoke local flares, which mechanisms may involve reaction to protein contaminants. We have previously developed a protein-free saline-soluble galactomannan derived from guar gum (GM) that displays both analgesia and chondroprotection in experimental osteoarthritis (OA). We now demonstrate that both GM and Hylan G-F20 (HY) promote mild synovitis with cytokine release after intra-articular injection. Methods: Mice received 100 μg/25 μL GM or HY or saline into the knees. Joint pain was evaluated using von Frey test; cell influx, interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, and CXCL-1 (pg/mL) levels were assessed in joint lavage at 6 h. Synovia were excised for histopathology. Results: Neither GM nor HY after being given into mice knee joints induced pain albeit promoting mild cell influx into joint washings as well as mild synovitis at histology, with no damage to the underlying cartilage. HY but not GM promoted IL-1 release into mice joints. Both compounds induced IL-6 and CXCL-1 release. Conclusion: Intra-articular injection of HY or GM promote acute transient synovitis whilst not provoking detectable significant joint damage. Local administration of these polysaccharides induces acute intra-articular release of inflammatory cytokines, which may account for joint flares following viscosupplementation.(AU)


Assuntos
Animais , Camundongos , Osteoartrite/fisiopatologia , Polissacarídeos/administração & dosagem , Viscossuplementação/instrumentação , Ácido Hialurônico/administração & dosagem
19.
Cad Saude Publica ; 35(10): e00098618, 2019.
Artigo em Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31596396

RESUMO

Knee osteoarthritis affects 3.8% of the world population and manifests as pain, edema, stiffness, and reduced joint function, impacting the patient's quality of life. Treatment consists of the pharmacological, non-pharmacological, and surgical modalities. Viscosupplementation (intraarticular hyaluronate) has been proposed to relieve symptoms and potentially postpone surgery. This study estimated the budget impact of the association of this drug and non-surgical treatment (standard treatment) from the perspective of the Brazilian Unified National Health System. Based on the assumption that 5% of patients proceed to treatment and on the direct costs of the pharmacological and non-pharmacological modalities, the authors calculated the reference and alternative scenarios that compared the different treatment options in a three-year timeline. The principal analysis estimated an incremental budget impact of approximately BRL 126 million (U$ 32 million) for one vial of hyaluronate a year and BRL 252 million (USD 64 million) for two vials a year. Diacerein, an oral chondroprotector, assessed as an alternative, showed a budget impact of BRL 334 million (USD 86 million) in relation to standard treatment, representing a 24% cost increase compared to two vials a year of hyaluronate, making it less economically advantageous. Viscosupplementation can provide better quality of life for patients, reduce costs for the health system, and optimize the flow of care in health services. The estimates presented in this study can assist administrators in the best use of resources and thus in decision-making on the technology's incorporation.


A osteoartrite de joelho afeta cerca de 3,8% da população mundial e se manifesta por dor, edema, rigidez e redução da função articular, impactando na qualidade de vida do paciente. O tratamento consiste na modalidade farmacológica, não farmacológica e cirúrgica. A viscossuplementação (ácido hialurônico intra-articular) se propõe a oferecer alívio dos sintomas e a possibilidade de adiamento da cirurgia. Este estudo estimou o impacto orçamentário entre a associação desse medicamento e o tratamento não cirúrgico (tratamento padrão), sob a perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde. Com base no pressuposto de que 5% dos portadores da doença seguem para tratamento e nos custos diretos das modalidades: farmacológica e não farmacológica foram calculados os cenários de referência e alternativos que compararam as diferentes opções de tratamento para um horizonte temporal de três anos. A análise principal estimou um impacto orçamentário incremental de aproximadamente R$ 126 milhões (1 ampola anual) e R$ 252 milhões (2 ampolas anuais). Já a diacereína, um condroprotetor oral, avaliada como uma opção alternativa, mostrou um impacto de R$ 334 milhões no orçamento em relação ao tratamento padrão, o que proporciona um aumento de 24% no custo em relação ao uso de 2 ampolas anuais de ácido hialurônico, tornando-a economicamente menos vantajosa. A viscossuplementação pode proporcionar maior qualidade de vida ao paciente, redução de custos para o sistema e otimização do fluxo de atendimento nas unidades de saúde. As estimativas apresentadas neste estudo podem auxiliar o gestor quanto à melhor utilização dos recursos financeiros e consequente tomada de decisão quanto à incorporação da tecnologia.


La osteoartritis de rodilla afecta a cerca de un 3,8% de la población mundial y se manifiesta por dolor, edema, rigidez y reducción de la función articular, impactando en la calidad de vida del paciente. El tratamiento consiste en la modalidad farmacológica, no farmacológica y quirúrgica. La viscosuplementación (ácido hialurónico intraarticular) se propone ofrecer un alivio de los síntomas y la posibilidad de un aplazamiento de la cirugía. Este estudio estimó el impacto presupuestario entre la asociación de este medicamento y el tratamiento no quirúrgico (tratamiento estándar), desde la perspectiva del Sistema Único de Salud. Basándonos en el supuesto de que un 5% de los portadores de la enfermedad siguen el tratamiento y en los costos directos de las modalidades tanto farmacológica, como no farmacológica, se calcularon los escenarios de referencia y alternativos que compararon las diferentes opciones de tratamiento para un horizonte temporal de tres años. El análisis principal estimó un impacto presupuestario incremental de aproximadamente BRL 126 millones (1 ampolla anual) y BRL 252 millones (2 ampollas anuales). En el caso de la diacereína, un condroprotector oral, evaluado como una opción alternativa, mostró un impacto de BRL 334 millones en el presupuesto, respecto al tratamiento estándar, lo que proporciona un aumento de un 24% en el costo, en relación con el uso de 2 ampollas anuales de ácido hialurónico, haciéndola económicamente menos ventajosa. La viscosuplementación puede proporcionar mayor calidad de vida al paciente, reducción de costes para el sistema y la optimización del flujo de atención en las unidades de salud. Las estimaciones presentadas en este estudio pueden ayudar al gestor en lo referente a una mejor utilización de los recursos financieros y, consecuentemente, en la toma de decisiones respecto a la incorporación de tecnología.


Assuntos
Ácido Hialurônico/uso terapêutico , Osteoartrite do Joelho/tratamento farmacológico , Viscossuplementação/economia , Viscossuplementos/uso terapêutico , Brasil/epidemiologia , Orçamentos , Humanos , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Osteoartrite do Joelho/epidemiologia , Prevalência
20.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 14(1): 314, 2019 Sep 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31533754

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid (HA) and a novel, on-site conjugate of HA with autologous fibrinogen in platelet-rich plasma (HA-PRP) in a canine model of osteoarthritis (OA) METHODS: Twelve beagle dogs underwent a unilateral resection of the cranial cruciate ligament (CrCL) of the stifle joint. Clinical and radiographic signs of OA were confirmed in all dogs 8 weeks following CrCL resection and prior to treatment. The dogs were randomized into three groups: saline (n = 4), HA (n = 4), and HA-PRP (n = 4). Each dog received intra-articular injections of the respective substance into the affected joint at pre-determined time points. The dogs were assessed for adverse effects for 3 days after each injection and for lameness, pain, range of motion, kinetics, and radiographic OA severity prior to treatment and 3 months after injection. OA severity as determined by radiographic examination was not significantly different among the groups at any time point. The dogs were then humanely euthanatized and the stifle joint assessed by gross and histological examinations. RESULTS: Dogs treated with four weekly injections of HA or two biweekly injections of HA-PRP were significantly (p < 0.05) better than dogs treated with four weekly injections of saline at 2-, 4-, and 12-week time points based on a comfortable range of motion (CROM) and clinical lameness score. Gait analysis measuring symmetry and weight distribution on pressure sensor walkway showed significantly (p < 0.05) improved limb function for dogs treated with HA and HA-PRP compared with dogs treated with saline yet with better clinical outcome for the HA-PRP-treated group at 12 and 20 weeks follow-up. Gross and histological analysis of synovium and articular cartilage demonstrated significant (p < 0.05) improvement by both treatments groups compared to controls. There was however significantly (p < 0.05) less damage to the cartilage in the HA-PRP group compared to the HA-treated group. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that while injection of HA and HA-PRP may be sufficient for short-term amelioration of the symptoms associated with OA, treatment with HA-PRP conjugates may be superior, providing significantly better long-term cartilage preservation.


Assuntos
Artrite Experimental/tratamento farmacológico , Ácido Hialurônico/administração & dosagem , Osteoartrite/tratamento farmacológico , Viscossuplementação/métodos , Viscossuplementos/uso terapêutico , Animais , Artrite Experimental/complicações , Artrite Experimental/diagnóstico por imagem , Artrite Experimental/patologia , Cartilagem Articular/patologia , Cães , Fibrinogênio/administração & dosagem , Fibrinogênio/efeitos adversos , Fibrinogênio/uso terapêutico , Marcha , Análise da Marcha/métodos , Ácido Hialurônico/efeitos adversos , Ácido Hialurônico/uso terapêutico , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Coxeadura Animal/etiologia , Osteoartrite/complicações , Osteoartrite/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteoartrite/patologia , Plasma Rico em Plaquetas , Radiografia , Distribuição Aleatória , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Joelho de Quadrúpedes/diagnóstico por imagem , Membrana Sinovial/patologia , Viscossuplementação/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA