Does lower use of academic affiliation by university faculty in top U.S. newspapers contribute to misinformation about abortion?

BACKGROUND: University faculty are considered trusted sources of information to disseminate accurate information to the public that abortion is a common, safe and necessary medical health care service. However, misinformation persists about abortion's alleged dangers, commonality, and medical necessity. METHODS: Systematic review of popular media articles related to abortion, gun control (an equally controversial topic), and cigarette use (a more neutral topic) published in top U.S. newspapers between January 2015 and July 2020 using bivariate analysis and logistic regression to compare disclosure of university affiliation among experts in each topic area. RESULTS: We included 41 abortion, 102 gun control, and 130 smoking articles, which consisted of 304 distinct media mentions of university-affiliated faculty. Articles with smoking and gun control faculty experts had statistically more affiliations mentioned (90%, n = 195 and 88%, n = 159, respectively) than abortion faculty experts (77%, n = 54) (p = 0.02). The probability of faculty disclosing university affiliation was similar between smoking and gun control (p = 0.73), but between smoking and abortion was significantly less (Ave Marginal Effects - 0.13, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Fewer faculty members disclose their university affiliation in top U.S. newspapers when discussing abortion. Lack of academic disclosure may paradoxically make these faculty appear less 'legitimate.' This leads to misinformation, branding abortion as a 'choice,' suggesting it is an unessential medical service. With the recent U.S. Supreme Court landmark decision, Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, and subsequent banning of abortion in many U.S. states, faculty will probably be even less likely to disclose their university affiliation in the media than in the past.

Mifepristone induced liver injury in a patient with Cushing syndrome: a case report and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Mifepristone, also known as RU-486, is an anti-progestational steroid with similar chemical structure to anabolic steroids. Given as a single dose in conjunction with misoprostol, mifepristone is used to induce medical abortion. Mifepristone administered chronically at a higher dose is also approved for the management of hypercortisolism. There have been only 2 reported cases of mifepristone associated liver injury, in both cases, in the setting of Cushing syndrome. We report a third patient with Cushing syndrome with mifepristone induced liver injury with unique histological findings that provide insight to the pathophysiology of liver injury in mifepristone and anabolic steroids. CASE PRESENTATION: Patient is a 63-year-old Caucasian female Cushing disease with no prior history of liver disease. She was started on mifepristone and semaglutide. Ninety days after initiating mifepristone, she developed deep jaundice, severe pruritus, fatigue, and nausea. Liver tests revealed a mixed hepatocellular/cholestatic pattern. Viral and autoimmune serologies were negative and there was no biliary dilatation on imaging. Liver biopsy showed severe cholestasis but no bile duct injury. Focal endothelialitis was present within a central venule. Cholestatic symptoms persisted for one month after presentation before slowly subsiding. Four months after stopping mifepristone, the patient's symptoms completely resolved, and liver tests became normal. Compilation of Roussell Uclaf Causality Assessment Method score indicated probable causality. CONCLUSIONS: Mifepristone shares a similar chemical structure as synthetic anabolic/androgenic steroids and there are many similarities in the clinical presentation of liver injury. This case and the 2 other reported cases share similar clinical characteristics. The observation of endothelialitis in our patient may provide a mechanistic link between mifepristone, or anabolic steroids in general, and the development of vascular complications such as peliosis.

The diagnostic value of transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography plus serum ß-HCG dynamic monitoring in intrauterine residue after medical abortion.

To probe the diagnostic value of transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography plus serum ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-HCG) dynamic monitoring in intrauterine residue after medical abortion.In total, 200 pregnant women undergoing medical abortion in our institution from January 2017 to December 2019 were picked, and assigned to either group A (n = 75, with residue) or group B (n = 125, without residue). We detected serum ß-HCG, progesterone (P), follicle stimulating estrogen (FSH) levels and ultrasonic indicators endometrial thickness (ET), peak systolic velocity (PSV), resistance index (RI) values, dissected correlation of indicators using logistic linear regression analysis, and prospected the diagnostic value of relevant indicators in intrauterine residue after medical abortion utilizingreceiver operating characteristic curve.At 7 days after abortion (T3), total vaginal bleeding and visual analogue scalescore in group A were saliently higher in contrast to group B ( P < .05). At 72 hours after abortion (T2) and T3, serum ß-HCG, P and FSH levels declined strikingly in both groups, but group B held plainly higher decrease rate than group A ( P HC.05). At T3, ET and PSV levels in both groups considerably waned, whereas RI levels notedly waxed, and group B owned markedly higher decrease/increase than group A ( P wa.05). At T3, serum ß-HCG in group A possessed positive association with serum P, FSH, intrauterine ET, PSV levels separately ( P HC.05), whereas negative link with RI levels ( P , .05). The specificity and sensitivity of ß-HCG, P, FSH, ß-HCG/ET, ß-HCG/PSV and ß-HCG/RI in the diagnosis of intrauterine residue after medical abortion were high ( P < .05).Serum ß-HCG dynamic monitoring plus transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography is of great value in diagnosing intrauterine residue after medical abortion. Serum ß-HCG, P, FSH levels can be combined with the results of intrauterine ET, PSV, RI values, so as to boost the diagnostic accuracy of the intrauterine residue after medical abortion.

Acute complications with same-day versus overnight cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation at 14 to 16 weeks.

OBJECTIVE: Evaluate if same-day cervical preparation is associated with a clinically acceptable complication rate compared with overnight osmotic dilators for dilation and evacuation (D&E). STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective, noninferiority, cohort study compared complication rates for same-day versus overnight cervical preparation with D&E between 14 and 16 weeks gestation. Cervical preparation was achieved with misoprostol, osmotic dilators, or both. Our primary outcome was the acute complication rate, defined as: hemorrhage (≥500 mL); hospitalization or hospital transfer; transfusion; or unplanned procedure occurring within 24 hours of the index procedure. Secondarily we evaluated nonmajor (re-aspiration, suture repair of cervical laceration, uterine tamponade, or emergency department only transfer) and major (transfusion, uterine artery embolization, abdominal surgery, or hospital admission) complications separately. Inverse probability of treatment weighting using the propensity score was used to perform an adjusted analysis, taking into account age, ethnicity, clinic location, insurance, gestational age, gravidity, and prior pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: We analyzed 1,319 subjects (n = 864 same-day, n = 455 overnight). Same-day cervical preparation patients were more likely to have Medicaid and a prior vaginal delivery. In both unadjusted and adjusted analyses, acute complication rates for same-day were noninferior to overnight preparation (unadjusted 0.93% vs 1.98%, difference of -1.05%, CI: -2.48% to 0.38%; adjusted difference -0.50%, CI: -1.45 to 0.44%). Only one major complication in the same-day group, a cervical laceration resulting in hemorrhage requiring transfusion, occurred in the entire sample. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective review, same-day cervical preparation was noninferior to overnight preparation for D&E between 14 and 16 weeks gestation, both with low complication rates. IMPLICATIONS: For early second trimester dilation and evacuation, same-day cervical preparation should be considered a safe alternative to overnight cervical preparation.

MORPHOLOGICAL RESEARCH OF ADHESIONS IN PATIENTS WITH TUBOPERITONEAL INFERTILITY.

OBJECTIVE: The aim: To study history, clinical manifestations and histological structure of adhesions in patients with tuboperitoneal infertility. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: 66 women with tuboperitoneal infertility and 30 healthy women were studied. The criterion for inclusion in the study was the presence of adhesions of the 2nd and 3rd degrees by J. Hulka et al. classification. During laparoscopy adhesions were sampled. Serial histological sections after preparation were stained with hematoxylin and eosin, picrofuxin according to van Gizon and fuxelin according to Hart. RESULTS: Results: The study showed that patients with tuboperitoneal infertility, unlike the control group, had surgery on the abdominal cavity and pelvic organs much more often, as well as inflammatory diseases of the reproductive organs. The majority of women in the control group had childbirth in history, whereas among the patients with infertility ectopic pregnancies and abortions prevailed. All examined women had adhesions that were confirmed during laparoscopy. The study showed that ultrasound is not an informative method to confirm this pathology. A histological study of adhesions revealed the presence of differences in their structure depending on the etiological factor (surgery or inflammation). CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Necessary to take into account the presence or absence of a chronic inflammatory process while developing approaches for the secondary prevention of the formation of adhesions in women with tuboperitoneal infertility at the stage of postoperative rehabilitation and infertility treatment.

Decidual macrophages in recurrent spontaneous abortion.

Recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) is defined as two or more pregnancy loss, affecting the happiness index of fertility couples. The mechanisms involved in the occurrence of RSA are not clear to date. The primary problem for the maternal immune system is how to establish and maintain the immune tolerance to the semi-allogeneic fetuses. During the pregnancy, decidual macrophages mainly play an important role in the immunologic dialogue. The purpose of this study is to explore decidual macrophages, and to understand whether there is a connection between these cells and RSA by analyzing their phenotypes and functions. Pubmed, Web of Science and Embase were searched. The eligibility criterion for this review was evaluating the literature about the pregnancy and macrophages. Any disagreement between the authors was resolved upon discussion and if required by the judgment of the corresponding author. We summarized the latest views on the phenotype, function and dysfunction of decidual macrophages to illuminate its relationship with RSA.

Secondary Infertility due to Fetal Bone Retention A systematic literature review.

Prolonged intrauterine retention of fetal bones during an abortion procedure can lead to secondary infertility. This review aimed to raise awareness among obstetric/gynaecologists about the possibility of this condition. A total of 17 case reports, seven case series and one retrospective study were included in this review, with 75 patients in total. Overall, 60% had a pregnancy termination in the second trimester, while 20% had a termination during the first trimester. Hysteroscopic resection was used to remove the intrauterine fetal bones in 69% of patients. In total, 59% of patients conceived following the procedure, 1% conceived despite the presence of intrauterine bones, 24% could not conceive at the time of the study and 16% had an unknown outcome. Transvaginal ultrasound was used for diagnosis in 41 (55%) patients, while pelvic ultrasound was used in 21 (28%) patients. In conclusion, secondary infertility is a common occurrence after a dilation and curettage procedure partially due to fetal bone retention. The gold standard for an accurate diagnosis and treatment is hysteroscopy.

Interpregnancy interval and adverse pregnancy outcomes among pregnancies following miscarriages or induced abortions in Norway (2008-2016): A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization recommends to wait at least 6 months after miscarriage and induced abortion before becoming pregnant again to avoid complications in the next pregnancy, although the evidence-based underlying this recommendation is scarce. We aimed to investigate the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes-preterm birth (PTB), spontaneous PTB, small for gestational age (SGA) birth, large for gestational age (LGA) birth, preeclampsia, and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)-by interpregnancy interval (IPI) for births following a previous miscarriage or induced abortion. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a cohort study using a total of 49,058 births following a previous miscarriage and 23,707 births following a previous induced abortion in Norway between 2008 and 2016. We modeled the relationship between IPI and 6 adverse pregnancy outcomes separately for births after miscarriages and births after induced abortions. We used log-binomial regression to estimate unadjusted and adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In the adjusted model, we included maternal age, gravidity, and year of birth measured at the time of the index (after interval) births. In a sensitivity analysis, we further adjusted for smoking during pregnancy and prepregnancy body mass index. Compared to births with an IPI of 6 to 11 months after miscarriages (10.1%), there were lower risks of SGA births among births with an IPI of <3 months (8.6%) (aRR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.79, 0.92, p < 0.01) and 3 to 5 months (9.0%) (aRR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83, 0.97, p = 0.01). An IPI of <3 months after a miscarriage (3.3%) was also associated with lower risk of GDM (aRR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.75, 0.96, p = 0.01) as compared to an IPI of 6 to 11 months (4.5%). For births following an induced abortion, an IPI <3 months (11.5%) was associated with a nonsignificant but increased risk of SGA (aRR 1.16, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.36, p = 0.07) as compared to an IPI of 6 to 11 months (10.0%), while the risk of LGA was lower among those with an IPI 3 to 5 months (8.0%) (aRR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.72, 0.98, p = 0.03) compared to an IPI of 6 to 11 months (9.4%). There was no observed association between adverse pregnancy outcomes with an IPI >12 months after either a miscarriage or induced abortion (p > 0.05), with the exception of an increased risk of GDM among women with an IPI of 12 to 17 months (5.8%) (aRR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.40, p = 0.02), 18 to 23 months (6.2%) (aRR 1.24, 95% CI: 1.02, 1.50, p = 0.03), and ≥24 months (6.4%) (aRR 1.14, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.34, p = 0.10) compared to an IPI of 6 to 11 months (4.5%) after a miscarriage. Inherent to retrospective registry-based studies, we did not have information on potential confounders such as pregnancy intention and health-seeking bahaviour. Furthermore, we only had information on miscarriages that resulted in contact with the healthcare system. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that conceiving within 3 months after a miscarriage or an induced abortion is not associated with increased risks of adverse pregnancy outcomes. In combination with previous research, these results suggest that women could attempt pregnancy soon after a previous miscarriage or induced abortion without increasing perinatal health risks.

An Unexpected Death Due to a Subclinical Pheochromocytoma After an Induced Abortion.

ABSTRACT: Deaths due to hypertensive crisis can be unexplained because of the impossibility to identify-before the decease-the specific cause of the crisis. In these cases, autopsy and microscopic examinations are needed. It can happen that the request to conduct these examinations can be submitted to forensic pathologists by prosecutors to ascertain medical malpractice claims. Indeed, we report the case of a 36-year-old woman who died after a minimally invasive medical procedure because of the occurrence of a severe hypertensive crisis. After death, the woman's relatives raised formal complaint for medical malpractice. For this reason, the prosecutor ordered to perform an autopsy. Examining the abdominal cavity, the forensic pathologists identified the left adrenal gland as expanded; in correspondence with organ's medulla, there was a gray and noncapsulated mass. Immunohistochemistry was performed: the microscopic samples were diffusely positive for chromogranin A, suggesting the diagnosis of a subclinical pheochromocytoma. In light of the above, medical malpractice was excluded. This case highlights that forensic pathologists should be aware that, in case of unexpected deaths due to hypertensive crisis, adrenal glands should be always accurately evaluated, performing specific immunohistochemistry study to exclude the presence of a pheochromocytoma.

Clinical Update on Uses for Mifepristone in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Importance: Mifepristone (RU-486) is a selective progesterone receptor modulator that has antagonist properties on the uterus and cervix. Mifepristone is an effective abortifacient, prompting limitations on its use in many countries. Mifepristone has many uses outside of induced abortion, but these are less well known and underutilized by clinicians because of challenges in accessing and prescribing this medication. Objectives: To provide clinicians with a history of the development of mifepristone and mechanism of action and safety profile, as well as detail current research on uses of mifepristone in both obstetrics and gynecology. Evidence Acquisition: A PubMed search of mifepristone and gynecologic and obstetric conditions was conducted between January 2018 and December 2021. Other resources were also searched, including guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society of Family Planning. Results: Mifepristone is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for first-trimester medication abortion but has other off-label uses in both obstetrics and gynecology. Obstetric uses that have been investigated include management of early pregnancy loss, intrauterine fetal demise, treatment of ectopic pregnancy, and labor induction. Gynecologic uses that have been investigated include contraception, treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding, and as an adjunct in treatment of gynecologic cancers. Conclusions and Relevance: Mifepristone is a safe and effective medication both for its approved use in first-trimester medication abortion and other off-label uses. Because of its primary use as an abortifacient, mifepristone is underutilized by clinicians. Providers should consider mifepristone for other indications as clinically appropriate.

Treating Cancer in Pregnant Patients After Roe v Wade Overturned.

This medical news feature discusses the challenges of treating pregnant patients diagnosed with cancer following the reversal of Roe v Wade.

Mifepristone: A Safe Method of Medical Abortion and Self-Managed Medical Abortion in the Post-Roe Era.

BACKGROUND: The U.S. Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision on June 24, 2022 effectively overturned federal constitutional protections for abortion that have existed since 1973 and returned jurisdiction to the states. Several states implemented abortion bans, some of which banned abortion after 6 weeks and others that permit abortion under limited exceptions, such as if the health or the life of the woman is in danger. Other states introduced bills that define life as beginning at fertilization. As a result of these new and proposed laws, the future availability of mifepristone, one of two drugs used for medical abortion in the United States, has become the topic of intense debate and speculation. AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY: Although its safety and effectiveness has been confirmed by many studies, the use of mifepristone has been politicized regularly since its approval. Areas of future study include mifepristone for induction termination and fetal demise in the third trimester and the management of leiomyoma. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Society of Family Planning, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the World Health Organization. THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES: The use of no-touch medical abortion, which entails providing a medical abortion via a telehealth platform without a screening ultrasound or bloodwork, expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic, and studies have confirmed its safety. With the Dobbs decision, legal abortion will be less accessible and, consequently, self-managed abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol will become more prevalent. CONCLUSIONS: Mifepristone and misoprostol are extremely safe medications with many applications. In the current changing political climate, physicians and pregnancy-capable individuals must have access to these medications.

Interest in and Uptake of Postabortion Long-Acting Reversible Contraception After Counseling at a Free-Standing Abortion Care Ambulatory Surgery Center, Atlanta, Georgia, 2017‒2018.

We sought to determine the impact of brief previsit counseling on long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) interest and uptake immediately after abortion. We conducted a randomized controlled trial at a free-standing abortion care ambulatory surgery center in metro-Atlanta, Georgia (2017-2018). Among 1270 women, a brief previsit counseling intervention increased interest in LARC by 4.5 percentage points, and interest in LARC after the intervention increased uptake by 9.6 percentage points. Providing brief previsit counseling significantly increased postabortion LARC uptake. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(9):1257-1260. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.306940).

Efficacy of Analgesic Propofol/Esketamine and Propofol/Fentanyl for Painless Induced Abortion: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background: Patients have widely accepted abortion as a remedy for contraceptive failure all over the world. Esketamine is a new anesthetic, sedative, and analgesic drug. Fentanyl is an opioid receptor agonist and a commonly used sedative. It is necessary to choose appropriate sedative drugs for painless abortion. Methods: We selected 238 cases of painless induced abortion from January 2020 to January 2022. We collected surgical parameters, the performance of sedation, and postoperative scales with complications before and after the operation. SPSS 21.0 was used to analyze data. Results: Surgical indicators between intervention and control groups had no difference; the preoperative indicators including intraoperative bispectral index (BIS), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) had no difference between the two groups. But after surgery, experiment groups had a higher value than the control group in these four indicators. The incidence of postoperative complications including nausea and vomit had no significant difference while the experiment group had a lower r-value than the control group in hypotension, bradycardia, decreased oxygen saturation, and respiratory depression. The postoperative VAS score and Ramsay score in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group. Conclusion: Since esketamine had better sedation performance, reduce the risk of cardiovascular and respiratory depression during sedation, and reduce the pain scale compared with fentanyl, we supported that propofol/esketamine is a good choice for patients receiving a painless induced abortion, and it is a sedation plan worth promoting and further analysis.

Abortion Knowledge Among Advanced Practice Clinicians in Colorado.

INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to quantify abortion law and care knowledge among Colorado advanced practice clinicians. METHODS: We conducted a stratified random survey of advanced practice clinicians, oversampling women's health and rural clinicians. We assessed sample characteristics, positions on abortion legality, and knowledge of abortion law and care. Mean knowledge scores were compared by sample characteristics. Survey responses were compared by provision of pregnancy options counseling and positions on abortion legality. Linear regression models were used to examine knowledge scores. RESULTS: A total of 513 participants completed the survey; the response rate was 21%. Abortion law knowledge questions (mean score, 1.7/7.0) ranged from 12% (physician-only law) to 45% (parental consent law) correct. For five of seven questions, "I don't know" was the most frequently chosen response. Abortion care knowledge questions (mean score, 2.8/8.0) ranged from 19% (abortion prevalence) to 60% (no elevated risk of breast cancer) correct. For four of eight questions, "I don't know" was the most frequently chosen response. Practicing in all other areas (e.g., family practice) was associated with lower abortion law and care knowledge than practicing in women's health. Providing options counseling was positively associated with abortion knowledge (law, ß = 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10-0.78; care, ß = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.08-0.95). Compared with participants who believe abortion should be legal in all circumstances, those who believe abortion should be illegal in all circumstances had similar abortion law knowledge (ß = -0.03; 95% CI, -0.65 to 0.59), but lower abortion care knowledge (ß = -1.85; 95% CI, -2.34 to -1.36). CONCLUSIONS: Abortion knowledge is low among Colorado advanced practice clinicians and education is needed.