Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A comparison of the analgesia efficacy and side effects of paravertebral compared with epidural blockade for thoracotomy: an updated meta-analysis.
Ding, Xibing; Jin, Shuqing; Niu, Xiaoyin; Ren, Hao; Fu, Shukun; Li, Quan.
Afiliación
  • Ding X; Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Department of Anesthesiology, East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Jin S; Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Department of Anesthesiology, East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Niu X; Department of Anesthesiology, East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Ren H; Department of Anesthesiology, East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Fu S; Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
  • Li Q; Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Department of Anesthesiology, East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
PLoS One ; 9(5): e96233, 2014.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24797238
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The most recent systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the analgesic efficacy and side effects of paravertebral and epidural blockade for thoracotomy was published in 2006. Nine well-designed randomized trials with controversial results have been published since then. The present report constitutes an updated meta-analysis of this issue. SUMMARY OF

BACKGROUND:

Thoracotomy is a major surgical procedure and is associated with severe postoperative pain. Epidural analgesia is the gold standard for post-thoracotomy pain management, but has its limitations and contraindications, and paravertebral blockade is increasingly popular. However, it has not been decided whether the analgesic effect of the two methods is comparable, or whether paravertebral blockade leads to a lower incidence of adverse side effects after thoracotomy.

METHODS:

Two reviewers independently searched the databases PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library (last performed on 1 February, 2013) for reports of studies comparing post-thoracotomy epidural analgesia and paravertebral blockade. The same individuals independently extracted data from the appropriate studies.

RESULT:

Eighteen trials involving 777 patients were included in the current analysis. There was no significant difference in pain scores between paravertebral blockade and epidural analgesia at 4-8, 24, 48 hours, and the rates of pulmonary complications and morphine usage during the first 24 hours were also similar. However, paravertebral blockade was better than epidural analgesia in reducing the incidence of urinary retention (p<0.0001), nausea and vomiting (p = 0.01), hypotension (p<0.00001), and rates of failed block were lower in the paravertebral blockade group (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS:

This meta-analysis showed that PVB can provide comparable pain relief to traditional EPI, and may have a better side-effect profile for pain relief after thoracic surgery. Further high-powered randomized trials are to need to determine whether PVB truly offers any advantages over EPI.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Dolor Postoperatorio / Toracostomía / Analgesia Epidural / Manejo del Dolor Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Dolor Postoperatorio / Toracostomía / Analgesia Epidural / Manejo del Dolor Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: PLoS One Asunto de la revista: CIENCIA / MEDICINA Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China