Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Multicenter observational study comparing sedation/analgesia protocols for laser photocoagulation treatment of retinopathy of prematurity.
Sato, Y; Oshiro, M; Takemoto, K; Hosono, H; Saito, A; Kondo, T; Aizu, K; Matsusawa, M; Futamura, Y; Asami, T; Terasaki, H; Hayakawa, M.
Afiliación
  • Sato Y; Division of Neonatology, Center for Maternal-Neonatal Care, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Oshiro M; Department of Pediatrics, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daiichi Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Takemoto K; Department of Pediatrics, Anjo Kosei Hospital, Anjo, Aichi, Japan.
  • Hosono H; Department of Pediatrics, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Aichi, Japan.
  • Saito A; Department of Pediatrics, Konan Kosei Hospital, Konan, Aichi, Japan.
  • Kondo T; Division of Neonatology, Center for Maternal-Neonatal Care, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Aizu K; Department of Pediatrics, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya Daiichi Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Matsusawa M; Division of Neonatology, Center for Maternal-Neonatal Care, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
  • Futamura Y; Department of Pediatric Cardiology and Neonatology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Gifu, Japan.
  • Asami T; Department of Neonatology, Toyota Memorial Hospital, Toyota, Aichi, Japan.
  • Terasaki H; Department of Pediatrics, Okazaki City Hospital, Okazaki, Aichi, Japan.
  • Hayakawa M; Department of Ophthalmology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
J Perinatol ; 35(11): 965-9, 2015 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26355942
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study was to identify the best sedation/analgesia protocol for laser photocoagulation (PC) of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). STUDY

DESIGN:

This multicenter observational study included five hospitals, each using a specific sedation/analgesia protocol local anesthesia with oxybuprocaine hydrochloride (Group L); intravenous pentazocine (Group P); intravenous fentanyl (Group F); air, oxygen and sevoflurane (AOS) inhalation (Group I). The groups were compared for pain responses, vital signs and adverse events.

RESULTS:

Heart rates and systemic blood pressures were elevated by PC in Groups L and P and Groups L, P and F, respectively. Moreover, poor analgesic efficacy was recognized in Groups L, P and F. In contrast, Group I experienced hypothermia, enteral feeding intolerance and apnea more frequently.

CONCLUSION:

From the viewpoint of sedation/pain relief, AOS anesthesia should be the best protocol. However, considering all the various factors together, the most reasonable one can be varied based on the patient's condition and hospital.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Dimensión del Dolor / Retinopatía de la Prematuridad / Recien Nacido Prematuro / Sedación Consciente / Fotocoagulación Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Newborn País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Perinatol Asunto de la revista: PERINATOLOGIA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Dimensión del Dolor / Retinopatía de la Prematuridad / Recien Nacido Prematuro / Sedación Consciente / Fotocoagulación Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Newborn País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Perinatol Asunto de la revista: PERINATOLOGIA Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón