Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating Harms in the Assessment of Net Benefit: A Framework for Newborn Screening Condition Review.
Goldenberg, Aaron J; Comeau, Anne Marie; Grosse, Scott D; Tanksley, Susan; Prosser, Lisa A; Ojodu, Jelili; Botkin, Jeffrey R; Kemper, Alex R; Green, Nancy S.
Afiliación
  • Goldenberg AJ; Department of Bioethics, Case Western Reserve University, School of Medicine, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106-4976, USA.
  • Comeau AM; New England Newborn Screening Program, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 305 South St., Jamaica Plain, MA, 02130, USA.
  • Grosse SD; National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, Atlanta, GA, 30341, USA.
  • Tanksley S; Laboratory Services Section, Newborn Screening Laboratory, Texas Department of State Health Services, PO Box 149347, MC 1947, Austin, TX, 78714-9347, USA.
  • Prosser LA; CHEAR Unit, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
  • Ojodu J; Health Management and Policy, SPH CHEAR Unit, Pediatrics, University of Michigan Health System, 300 N Ingalls St, Rm 6E14, SPC 5456, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
  • Botkin JR; Association of Public Health Laboratories, 8515 Georgia Avenue, Suite 700, Silver Spring, MD, 20910, USA.
  • Kemper AR; Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah, 75 South 2000 East #108, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112-8930, USA.
  • Green NS; Department of Pediatrics, Duke University/Duke Clinical Research Institute, 2400 Pratt Street Rm 0311, Terrace Level, NP, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
Matern Child Health J ; 20(3): 693-700, 2016 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26833040
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children ("Advisory Committee") makes recommendations to the HHS Secretary regarding addition of new conditions to the national Recommended Uniform Screening Panel for newborns. The Advisory Committee's decision-making process includes assessing the net benefit of screening for nominated conditions, informed by systematic evidence reviews generated by an independent Condition Review Workgroup. The evidence base regarding harms associated with screening for specific conditions is often more limited than that for benefits. PROCEDURES The process for defining potential harms from newborn screening reviewed the frameworks from other public health evidence-based review processes, adapted to newborn screening by experts in systematic review, newborn screening programs and bioethics, with input from and approval by the Advisory Committee. MAIN

FINDINGS:

To support the Advisory Committee's review of nominated conditions, the Workgroup has developed a standardized approach to evaluation of harms and relevant gaps in the evidence. Types of harms include the physical burden to infants; psychosocial and logistic burdens to families from screening or diagnostic evaluation; increased risk of medical treatment for infants diagnosed earlier than children with clinical presentation; delayed diagnosis from false negative results; psychosocial harm from false positive results; uncertainty of clinical diagnosis, age of onset or clinical spectrum; and disparities in access to diagnosis or therapy.

CONCLUSIONS:

Estimating the numbers of children at risk, the magnitude, timing and likelihood of harms will be integrated into Workgroup reports to the Advisory Committee.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud / Tamizaje Masivo / Tamizaje Neonatal / Comités Consultivos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Infant / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: Matern Child Health J Asunto de la revista: PERINATOLOGIA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud / Tamizaje Masivo / Tamizaje Neonatal / Comités Consultivos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Infant / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: Matern Child Health J Asunto de la revista: PERINATOLOGIA Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos