Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Infection Control Professionals' Views on the Handling of MRSA-Colonised Healthcare Workers]. / Der Umgang mit MRSA bei Beschäftigten im Gesundheitsdienst aus Sicht der Krankenhaushygiene.
Peters, C; Dulon, M; Lietz, J; Nienhaus, A.
Afiliación
  • Peters C; Institut für Versorgungsforschung in der Dermatologie und bei Pflegeberufen (CVcare), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg.
  • Dulon M; Berufsgenossenschaft für Gesundheitsdienst und Wohlfahrtspflege (BGW), Grundlagen der Prävention und Rehabilitation, Hamburg.
  • Lietz J; Institut für Versorgungsforschung in der Dermatologie und bei Pflegeberufen (CVcare), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg.
  • Nienhaus A; Institut für Versorgungsforschung in der Dermatologie und bei Pflegeberufen (CVcare), Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf (UKE), Hamburg.
Gesundheitswesen ; 79(8-09): 648-654, 2017 Aug.
Article en De | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27300093
ABSTRACT

Background:

Colonisation with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a particular challenge for medical staff and their facilities, with a key role being played by physicians alongside infection control and hospital hygiene professionals.

Methods:

In 2014, infection control and hygiene staff were surveyed on the handling of hospital staff with MRSA colonisation. The questionnaire queried on MRSA management in hospitals and on the cooperation between hygiene staff and hospital physicians and was compared to a survey of physicians' experience with the care of MRSA-positive hospital staff.

Results:

124 hospital hygiene professionals participated in the survey. General screenings of staff members were reported mainly for cases of MRSA outbreak. Temporary colonisation is differentiated from permanent colonisation (47%). 2 unsuccessful attempts at decolonisation are normally regarded as an indicator for a permanent colonisation. Generally there was cooperation between hospital physicians and hygiene staff. The responsibility for screening and decolonisation of staff members is shared by both groups with the groups placing emphasis on different focal points. Different approaches for the handling of MRSA-positive staff were reported and recommendations for the work ability vary from merely observing the standard hygiene regulation to refraining from close patient contact or even complete absence from work.

Conclusion:

MRSA colonisation in hospital staff is being dealt with in different manners. Infection control and hospital hygiene professionals are equally involved in the treatment. Clear regulations would benefit the handling of MRSA in staff members.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Infecciones Estafilocócicas / Actitud del Personal de Salud / Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles / Desinfección / Infección Hospitalaria / Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Profesional a Paciente / Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Screening_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: De Revista: Gesundheitswesen Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Infecciones Estafilocócicas / Actitud del Personal de Salud / Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles / Desinfección / Infección Hospitalaria / Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Profesional a Paciente / Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Screening_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: De Revista: Gesundheitswesen Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article