Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of national prenatal screening on the time of diagnosis and outcome of pregnancies affected with common trisomies, a cohort study in the Northern Netherlands.
Bouman, Katelijne; Bakker, Marian K; Birnie, Erwin; Ter Beek, Lies; Bilardo, Caterina M; van Langen, Irene M; de Walle, Hermien E K.
Afiliación
  • Bouman K; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Bakker MK; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.k.bakker@umcg.nl.
  • Birnie E; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Obstetrics, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. m.k.bakker@umcg.nl.
  • Ter Beek L; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Bilardo CM; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • van Langen IM; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Obstetrics, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • de Walle HE; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Genetics, PO Box 30001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 17(1): 4, 2017 01 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28056858
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To evaluate the impact of the introduction of prenatal screening on time of detection and pregnancy outcome for trisomy 21 (T21), trisomy 18 (T18) and trisomy 13 (T13).

METHODS:

We performed a retrospective, population-based cohort study in the Northern Netherlands including 503 trisomy cases born between 2005 and 2012. Screening tests and invasive procedures, timing of diagnosis and pregnancy outcome were compared between the period before (2005-2006) and after introduction (2007-2012) using X 2 tests.

RESULTS:

There was an increase in proportion of women who had a prenatal screening and/or invasive test, from 62% in 2005-2006 to 84% in 2010-2012 (p < 0.01), while the proportion of prenatally diagnosed cases did not change (60% overall). In women < =35 years 47% of the cases were diagnosed prenatally vs 73% in women >35 years (p < 0.01). More T13/T18 cases were diagnosed <24 weeks after introduction (62% vs 84%; p < 0.01). In T13/T18 intra-uterine death decreased (26% vs 15%), while terminations increased 55% vs 72%.

CONCLUSION:

The introduction of prenatal screening had limited impact on the time of detection and outcome of the most common trisomies. The introduction of the 20-week anomaly scan has resulted in more trisomy cases diagnosed <24 weeks and a shift from fetal death to terminations.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Diagnóstico Prenatal / Factores de Tiempo / Tamizaje Masivo / Trastornos de los Cromosomas / Política de Salud Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Asunto de la revista: OBSTETRICIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Diagnóstico Prenatal / Factores de Tiempo / Tamizaje Masivo / Trastornos de los Cromosomas / Política de Salud Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Evaluation_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Asunto de la revista: OBSTETRICIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos