Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bleeding Complications in Patients Undergoing Intrathecal Drug Delivery System Implantation.
Warner, Nafisseh S; Bendel, Markus A; Warner, Matthew A; Strand, Jacob J; Gazelka, Halena M; Hoelzer, Bryan C; Mauck, William D; Lamer, Tim J; Kor, Daryl J; Moeschler, Susan M.
Afiliación
  • Warner NS; Departments of Anesthesiology.
  • Bendel MA; Pain Medicine.
  • Warner MA; Departments of Anesthesiology.
  • Strand JJ; Pain Medicine.
  • Gazelka HM; Departments of Anesthesiology.
  • Hoelzer BC; Critical Care Medicine.
  • Mauck WD; Palliative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Lamer TJ; Departments of Anesthesiology.
  • Kor DJ; Pain Medicine.
  • Moeschler SM; Palliative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Pain Med ; 18(12): 2422-2427, 2017 Dec 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28340041
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Intrathecal drug delivery systems (IDDSs) have dramatically improved analgesia and the functional status of cancer patients and those with chronic pain states. However, given the close proximity to the neuraxis and frequent concomitant use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications, this intervention is not without risk. The goal of this investigation was to determine the incidence of bleeding complications following IDDS placement.

METHODS:

This is a retrospective review from 2005 through 2014 of adult patients undergoing IDDS implantation or revision at a tertiary care center. The primary outcome was a bleeding-related neurological complication requiring emergency medicine, neurology, or neurosurgical evaluation within 31 days.

RESULTS:

A total of 247 procedures were performed on 216 unique patients. Patients received aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) within seven days of needle placement for 64 procedures (25.9%). A preprocedural platelet count or international normalized ratio (INR) was available within 30 days for 138 procedures (55.9%). Of these, two patients had a platelet count lower than 100 x 109/L and one patient had an INR of 1.5 or higher at the time of the procedure. One neurological complication was identified (0.4%) that was not related to procedural bleeding. Similarly, three patients (1.2%) received a periprocedural red blood cell transfusion, none of which were related to procedural bleeding.

CONCLUSION:

No cases of bleeding-related neurological complications were identified following IDDS placement or revision, including in those receiving aspirin or NSAIDs. Future investigations with larger numbers are needed to further explore the safety of antithrombotic therapy continuation or discontinuation periprocedurally.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Bombas de Infusión Implantables / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos / Manejo del Dolor / Hemorragia Tipo de estudio: Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Pain Med Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Complicaciones Posoperatorias / Bombas de Infusión Implantables / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos / Manejo del Dolor / Hemorragia Tipo de estudio: Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Pain Med Asunto de la revista: NEUROLOGIA / PSICOFISIOLOGIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article