Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Stereotactic radiosurgery practice patterns for brain metastases in the United States: a national survey.
Blomain, Erik Scott; Kim, Hyun; Garg, Shivank; Bhamidipati, Deepak; Guo, Jenny; Kalchman, Ingrid; McAna, John; Shi, Wenyin.
Afiliación
  • Blomain ES; Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
  • Kim H; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, 111 South 11th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
  • Garg S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, 111 South 11th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
  • Bhamidipati D; Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
  • Guo J; Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
  • Kalchman I; Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
  • McAna J; Jefferson College of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
  • Shi W; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, 111 South 11th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
J Radiat Oncol ; 7(3): 241-246, 2018 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30416676
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as an important modality for the treatment of intracranial metastases. There are currently few established guidelines delineating indications for SRS use and fewer still regarding plan evaluation in the treatment of multiple brain metastases.

METHODS:

An 18 question electronic survey was distributed to radiation oncologists at National Cancer Institute (NCI) designated cancer centers in the USA (60). Centers without radiation oncologists were excluded. Physicians who indicated that they do not prescribe SRS were excluded from the remaining survey questions. Sign test and Chi-square test were used to determine if responses differed significantly from random distribution.

RESULTS:

One hundred sixteen of the 697 radiation oncologists surveyed completed the questionnaire, representing 51 institutions. Sixty-two percent reported treating patients with brain metastases using SRS. Radiation oncologists prescribing SRS most commonly treat CNS (66.2%) and lung (49.3%) malignancies. SRS was used more frequently for < 10 brain metastases (73.7%; p < 0.0001) and whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for > 10 brain metastases (82.5%; p < 0.0001). The maximum number of lesions physicians were willing to treat with SRS without WBRT was 1-4 (40.4%) and 5-10 (42.4%) (p < 0.0001 compared to 11-15, 16-20 and no limit). The most important criteria for choosing SRS or WBRT were number of lesions (p < 0.0001) and performance status (p = 0.016). The most common margin for SRS was 0 mm (49.1%; p = 0.0021). The most common dose constraints other than critical structure was conformity index (84.2%) and brain V12 (61.4%). The LINAC was the most common treatment modality (54.4%) and mono-isocenter technique for multiple brain metastases was commonly used (43.9%; p = 0.23). Most departments do not have a policy for brain metastases treatment (64.9%; p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS:

This is one of the first national surveys assessing the use of SRS for brain metastases in clinical practice. These data highlight some clinical considerations for physicians treating brain metastases with SRS.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: J Radiat Oncol Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: J Radiat Oncol Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos