Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Gadolinium retention in gliomas and adjacent normal brain tissue: association with tumor contrast enhancement and linear/macrocyclic agents.
Kiviniemi, Aida; Gardberg, Maria; Ek, Paul; Frantzén, Janek; Bobacka, Johan; Minn, Heikki.
Afiliación
  • Kiviniemi A; Department of Radiology, Division of Medical Imaging, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Kiinamyllynkatu 4-8, FI-20521, Turku, Finland. aida.kiviniemi@utu.fi.
  • Gardberg M; Department of Pathology, University of Turku, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • Ek P; Johan Gadolin Process Chemistry Centre, Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.
  • Frantzén J; Department of Neurosurgery and Division of Clinical Neurosciences, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
  • Bobacka J; Johan Gadolin Process Chemistry Centre, Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.
  • Minn H; Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.
Neuroradiology ; 61(5): 535-544, 2019 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30710184
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To quantitate gadolinium deposits in gliomas and adjacent normal brain specimens, and to evaluate their association with tumor contrast enhancement and the type of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) used.

METHODS:

A total of 69 patients with primary glioma who underwent contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prior to surgery were included in this retrospective study. Gadolinium was measured from histologically viable tumor, normal brain, and necrosis within the sample, when available, using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Tumor contrast enhancement was categorized as none, minimal, or noticeable. Differences in gadolinium deposits by contrast enhancement and GBCA type were assessed.

RESULTS:

Seven patients received linear GBCA and 62 macrocyclic, respectively. At the time of surgery, gadolinium deposits were detected in 39 out of 69 (57%) tumor samples, 8 out of 13 (62%) normal brain, and 12 out of 14 (86%) necrotic specimens. Gadolinium was detected in both enhancing and non-enhancing tumors, but was greatest in gliomas with noticeable enhancement (p = 0.02). Administration of linear agents gadodiamide and gadopentetate dimeglumine resulted in significantly higher tumor gadolinium relative to macrocyclic gadoterate meglumine (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively). Normal brain and necrosis also showed higher gadolinium after exposure to linear gadodiamide (both p < 0.05). In multivariate regression, GBCA type (linear/macrocyclic) was the most powerful predictor of tumor gadolinium retention (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

Gadolinium can be detected in both enhancing and non-enhancing gliomas, neighboring normal brain, and necrosis. Gadolinium retention is higher after exposure to linear GBCAs compared with the macrocyclic gadoterate meglumine.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Encéfalo / Neoplasias Encefálicas / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Medios de Contraste / Glioma Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Neuroradiology Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Finlandia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Encéfalo / Neoplasias Encefálicas / Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Medios de Contraste / Glioma Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Neuroradiology Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Finlandia