Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
RapidPlan knowledge based planning: iterative learning process and model ability to steer planning strategies.
Fogliata, A; Cozzi, L; Reggiori, G; Stravato, A; Lobefalo, F; Franzese, C; Franceschini, D; Tomatis, S; Scorsetti, M.
Afiliación
  • Fogliata A; Radiotherapy Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy. antonella.fogliata@humanitas.it.
  • Cozzi L; Radiotherapy Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
  • Reggiori G; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Rozzano, Italy.
  • Stravato A; Radiotherapy Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
  • Lobefalo F; Radiotherapy Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
  • Franzese C; Radiotherapy Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
  • Franceschini D; Radiotherapy Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
  • Tomatis S; Radiotherapy Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
  • Scorsetti M; Radiotherapy Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Radiat Oncol ; 14(1): 187, 2019 Oct 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31666094
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To determine if the performance of a knowledge based RapidPlan (RP) planning model could be improved with an iterative learning process, i.e. if plans generated by an RP model could be used as new input to re-train the model and achieve better performance.

METHODS:

Clinical VMAT plans from 83 patients presenting with head and neck cancer were selected to train an RP model, CL-1. With this model, new plans on the same patients were generated, and subsequently used as input to train a novel model, CL-2. Both models were validated on a cohort of 20 patients and dosimetric results compared. Another set of 83 plans was realised on the same patients with different planning criteria, by using a simple template with no attempt to manually improve the plan quality. Those plans were employed to train another model, TP-1. The differences between the plans generated by CL-1 and TP-1 for the validation cohort of patients were compared with respect to the differences between the original plans used to build the two models.

RESULTS:

The CL-2 model presented an improvement relative to CL-1, with higher R2 values and better regression plots. The mean doses to parallel organs decreased with CL-2, while D1% to serial organs increased (but not significantly). The different models CL-1 and TP-1 were able to yield plans according to each original strategy.

CONCLUSION:

A refined RP model allowed the generation of plans with improved quality, mostly for parallel organs at risk and, possibly, also the intrinsic model quality.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador / Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada / Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Radiat Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / RADIOTERAPIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador / Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada / Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Radiat Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS / RADIOTERAPIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia