Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
No Difference in the Phenotypic Expression of Frailty among Elderly Patients Recently Diagnosed with Cancer Vs Cancer Free Patients.
El Haddad, K; Rolland, Y; Gérard, S; Mourey, L; Sourdet, S; Vellas, B; Stephan, E; Abellan Van Kan, G; de Souto Barreto, P; Balardy, L.
Afiliación
  • El Haddad K; K. EL Haddad, Institut du Vieillissement, Gérontopôle, Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, 37 Allées Jules Guesde, 31000 Toulouse, France. E-mail: kamal.elhaddad@hotmail.com, Tel: +33561145657; fax: +33561145640.
J Nutr Health Aging ; 24(2): 147-151, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32003403
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To examine frailty determinants differences in patients with a recent diagnosis of cancer compared to non-cancer patients among older adult. Revealing those differences will allow us to individualize the exact frailty management in those patients diagnosed with cancer.

DESIGN:

This is an observational cross-sectional, monocentric study.

SETTING:

Patients were evaluated at the Geriatric Frailty Clinic (GFC), in the Toulouse University Hospital, France, between October 2011 and February 2016.

PARTICIPANTS:

1996 patients aged 65 and older were included (1578 patients without cancer and 418 patients with solid and hematological cancer recently diagnosed). MEASUREMENTS Frailty was established according to the frailty phenotype. The frailty phenotype measures five components of frailty weight loss, exhaustion, low physical activity, weakness and slow gait. Frailty phenotype was categorized as robust, pre-frail and frail.

RESULTS:

In a multinomial logistic regression, cancer, compared to the non-cancer group, is not associated with an increased likelihood of being classified as pre frail (RRR 0.9, 95% CI [0.5 ; 1.6 ], p 0.9) or frail (RRR 1.2, 95% CI [0.7 ; 2.0], p 0.4) rather than robust. When considering each Fried criterion, a significant higher odd of weight loss was observed in older patients with cancer compared to the non-cancer patients (OR 2.3, 95% CI [1.8; 3.0], p <0.001) but no statistically significant differences was found among the four other Fried criteria. Sensitivity analysis on the frailty index showed that cancer was not associated with a higher FI score compared to non-cancer (ß 0.002, 95%CI [-0.009; 0.01], p 0.6).

CONCLUSION:

In this real-life study evaluating elderly patients with and without cancer, we didn't confirm our hypothesis, in fact we found that cancer was not associated with frailty severity using both a phenotypic model and a deficit accumulation approach. Cancer may contribute, at least additively, to the development of frailty, like any other comorbidity, rather than a global underlying condition of vulnerability.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Anciano Frágil / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Nutr Health Aging Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO / GERIATRIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Anciano Frágil / Neoplasias Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Nutr Health Aging Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO / GERIATRIA Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article