Prognostic value of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, transient elastography and blood-based fibrosis markers in patients with chronic liver disease.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Liver cT1 , liver T1 , transient elastography (TE) and blood-based biomarkers have independently been shown to predict clinical outcomes but have not been directly compared in a single cohort of patients. Our aim was to compare these tests' prognostic value in a cohort of patients with compensated chronic liver disease. METHODS: Patients with unselected compensated liver disease aetiologies had baseline assessments and were followed up for development of clinical outcomes, blinded to the imaging results. The prognostic value of non-invasive liver tests at prespecified thresholds was assessed for a combined clinical endpoint comprising ascites, variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation and mortality. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-seven patients (61% male) with median age of 54 years were followed up for 693 patient-years (median (IQR) 43 (26-58) months). The main diagnoses were NAFLD (41%), viral hepatitis (VH, 25%) and alcohol-related liver disease (ArLD; 14%). During follow-up 14 new clinical events, and 11 deaths occurred. Clinical outcomes were predicted by liver cT1  > 825ms with HR 9.9 (95% CI 1.29-76.4, P = .007), TE > 8kPa with HR 7.8 (95% CI 0.97-62.3, P = .02) and FIB-4 > 1.45 with HR 4.09 (95% CI 0.90-18.4, P = .05). In analysis taking into account technical failure and unreliability, liver cT1  > 825 ms could predict clinical outcomes (P = .03), but TE > 8kPa could not (P = .4). CONCLUSIONS: We provide further evidence that liver cT1 , TE and serum-based biomarkers can predict clinical outcomes, but when taking into account technical failure/unreliability, TE cut-offs perform worse than those of cT1 and blood biomarkers.