Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dose calculation accuracy in particle therapy: Comparing carbon ions with protons.
Ruangchan, Sirinya; Palmans, Hugo; Knäusl, Barbara; Georg, Dietmar; Clausen, Monika.
Afiliación
  • Ruangchan S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Palmans H; Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Knäusl B; Division of Medical Physics, MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria.
  • Georg D; Medical Radiation Science, National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, UK.
  • Clausen M; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Med Phys ; 48(11): 7333-7345, 2021 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34482555
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This work presents the validation of an analytical pencil beam dose calculation algorithm in a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) for carbon ions by measurements of dose distributions in heterogeneous phantom geometries. Additionally, a comparison study of carbon ions versus protons is performed considering current best solutions in commercial TPS.

METHODS:

All treatment plans were optimized and calculated using the RayStation TPS (RaySearch, Sweden). The dose distributions calculated with the TPS were compared with measurements using a 24-pinpoint ionization chamber array (T31015, PTW, Germany). Tissue-like inhomogeneities (bone, lung, and soft tissue) were embedded in water, while a target volume of 4 x 4 x 4 cm3 was defined at two different depths behind the heterogeneities. In total, 10 different test cases, with and without range shifter as well as different air gaps, were investigated. Dose distributions inside as well as behind the target volume were evaluated.

RESULTS:

Inside the target volume, the mean dose difference between calculations and measurements, averaged over all test cases, was 1.6% for carbon ions. This compares well to the final agreement of 1.5% obtained in water at the commissioning stage of the TPS for carbon ions and is also within the clinically acceptable interval of 3%. The mean dose difference and maximal dose difference obtained outside the target area were 1.8% and 13.4%, respectively. The agreement of dose distributions for carbon ions in the target volumes was comparable or better to that between Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations and measurements for protons. Percentage dose differences of more than 10% were present outside the target area behind bone-lung structures, where the carbon ion calculations systematically over predicted the dose. MC dose calculations for protons were superior to carbon ion beams outside the target volumes.

CONCLUSION:

The pencil beam dose calculations for carbon ions in RayStation were found to be in good agreement with dosimetric measurements in heterogeneous geometries for points of interest located within the target. Large local discrepancies behind the target may contribute to incorrect dose predictions for organs at risk.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Protones / Terapia de Protones Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Med Phys Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Austria

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Protones / Terapia de Protones Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: Med Phys Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Austria