Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
MR angiography-planned prostatic artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: single-center retrospective study in 56 patients.
Vogl, Thomas J; Zinn, Annette; Elhawash, Elsayed; Alizadeh, Leona S; Nour-Eldin, Nour-Eldin A; Naguib, Nagy N N.
Afiliación
  • Vogl TJ; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Zinn A; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Elhawash E; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Alizadeh LS; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Nour-Eldin NA; Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cairo University Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
  • Naguib NNN; Department of Radiology, AMEOS Hospital Halberstadt, Halberstadt, Germany;Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Alexandria University Hospital, Alexandria, Egypt.
Diagn Interv Radiol ; 27(6): 725-731, 2021 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34792026
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

We aimed to evaluate the advantages of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)-planned prostatic artery embolization (PAE) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS:

In this retrospective study, MRAs of 56 patients (mean age, 67.23±7.73 years; age range, 47-82 years) who underwent PAE between 2017 and 2018 were evaluated. For inclusion, full information about procedure time and radiation values must have been available. To identify prostatic artery (PA) origin, three-dimensional MRA reconstruction with maximum intensity projection was conducted in every patient. In total, 33 patients completed clinical and imaging follow-up and were included in clinical evaluation.

RESULTS:

There were 131 PAs with a second PA in 19 pelvic sides. PA origin was correctly identified via MRA in 108 of 131 PAs (82.44%). In patients in which MRA allowed a PA analysis, a significant reduction of the fluoroscopy time (-27.0%, p = 0.028) and of the dose area product (-38.0%, p = 0.003) was detected versus those with no PA analysis prior to PAE. Intervention time was reduced by 13.2%, (p = 0.25). Mean fluoroscopy time was 30.1 min, mean dose area product 27,749 µGy•m2, and mean entrance dose 1553 mGy. Technical success was achieved in all 56 patients (100.0%); all patients were embolized on both pelvic sides. The evaluated data documented a significant reduction in IPSS (p < 0.001; mean 9.67 points).

CONCLUSION:

MRA prior to PAE allowed the identification of PA in 82.44% of the cases. MRA-planned PAE is an effective treatment for patients with BPH.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Embolización Terapéutica Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Diagn Interv Radiol Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / RADIOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Embolización Terapéutica Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Diagn Interv Radiol Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / RADIOLOGIA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania