Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Short screener for suicidal behaviour in primary care - a systematic review]. / Kurze Screener für Suizidalität in der Allgemeinmedizin : Eine systematische Übersichtsarbeit.
Lukaschek, Karoline; Frank, Milena; Halfter, Kathrin; Schneider, Antonius; Gensichen, Jochen.
Afiliación
  • Lukaschek K; - Institut für Allgemeinmedizin -, Campus Innenstadt d. LMU München, Pettenkoferstraße 8 a, 80336, München, Germany. karoline.lukaschek@med.uni-muenchen.de.
  • Frank M; Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinik der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.
  • Halfter K; Institut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, München, Germany.
  • Schneider A; Institut für Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
  • Gensichen J; Institut für Allgemeinmedizin, LMU München, München, Germany.
MMW Fortschr Med ; 163(Suppl 6): 9-18, 2021 Dec.
Article en De | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34817784
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

We summarize the available studies reporting diagnostic accuracy of brief instruments for suicidal behaviour in primary care.

METHOD:

Databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychINFO, PSYNDEX, and Cochrane Library were searched without any time constraints. Risk of bias and applicability concerns were assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. The certainty of evidence was rated via GRADEpro. We included studies on primary care patients or participants from the general population. Suicidal behaviour was the defined target condition. With respect to the applicability in a primary care setting we included only studies assessing brief screening instruments; a brief instrument was defined as having no more than 12 items. We assessed sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value.

RESULTS:

A total of 12,460 studies were identified; of those, n = 7 fulfilled all strong criteria and were included. The range of sensitivity was 0.26-1.00, specificity was 0.64-0.99, positive predictive value 0.06-0.91, negative predictive value 0.83-1.00. Risk of bias was rated moderate and concerns regarding applicability acceptable. A required sensitivity of at least 0.80 and specificity of 0.50 with a moderate to high GRADE rating was achieved by 8 of 11 index tests.

CONCLUSIONS:

Brief screening instruments can support ruling-out suicidality, but are less suitable for ruling-in. They may support general practitioners in an initial assessment, but in case of a positive test result, a valid diagnostic assessment should be done by a structured clinical interview.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Atención Primaria de Salud / Ideación Suicida Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: De Revista: MMW Fortschr Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Atención Primaria de Salud / Ideación Suicida Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: De Revista: MMW Fortschr Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania