Strategies for Mechanical Right Ventricular Support During Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Refractory right ventricular failure at the time of left ventricular assist device implantation requires treatment with supplemental mechanical circulatory support. However, the optimal strategy for support remains unknown. METHODS: All patients undergoing first-time durable left ventricular assist device implantation with a contemporary device were selected from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Database (2011 to 2019). Patients requiring right ventricular assist device (RVAD) or venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) were included in the analysis. Patients were stratified by RVAD or VA-ECMO and by timing of placement (intraoperative vs postoperative). RESULTS: In all, 18 423 left ventricular assist device implants were identified, of which 940 (5.1%) required RVAD (n = 750) or VA-ECMO (n = 190) support. Patients receiving an RVAD more frequently had preoperative inotrope requirement (76% vs 62%, P < .01) and severe tricuspid regurgitation (20% vs 13%, P < .01). The RVAD patients had lower rates of postoperative renal failure (40% vs 51%, P = .02) and limb ischemia (4% vs 13%, P < .01), as well as significantly less operative mortality (41% vs 54%, P < .01). After risk adjustment with propensity score analysis, support with VA-ECMO was associated with a higher risk of mortality (risk ratio 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.21 to 1.77; P < .01) compared with patients receiving an RVAD. Importantly, institution of right ventricular support postoperatively was associated with higher mortality (1.43, P < .01) compared with intraoperative initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe right ventricular failure in the setting of durable left ventricular assist device implantation may benefit from the use of RVAD over VA-ECMO. Regardless of the type of support, initiation at the index operation was associated with improved outcomes.