[Application of dual-channel contrast-enhanced ultrasound in classification of hilar cholangiocarcinoma and diagnosis of etiology of low biliary obstruction].
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi
; 101(17): 1262-1268, 2021 May 11.
Article
en Zh
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-34865396
ABSTRACT
Objective:
To investigate the clinical value of dual-channel contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCUS) in the classification of hilar cholangiocarcinoma and the diagnosis of the etiology of low obstructive jaundice.Methods:
The data of 114 patients with obstructive jaundice examined by the Department of Ultrasound of Lanzhou University Second Hospital from October 2018 to February 2020 were retrospectively collected. There were 60 males and 54 females, aged 37~84 (63±10) years. All patients underwent preoperative transvenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), intraoperative puncture needles, postoperative ultrasound-guided percutaneous transhepatic cholangiocarcinography (UG-PTC) and three-dimensional ultrasound cholangiography (3D-USC) through an external drainage tube, known as DCUS. The classification of hilar cholangiocarcinoma and the nature of low biliary tract obstruction were determined according to the characteristics of DCUS images. All patients who have received DCUS underwent magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and X-ray cholangiography. X-ray cholangiography was used as the gold standard for classification of hilar cholangiocarcinoma, and the accuracy of US, CEUS and DCUs was analyzed. Low obstructive jaundice was characterized by surgical pathology as the gold standard, and the diagnostic efficacy of conventional ultrasound (US), CEUS and DCUs was analyzed. At the same time, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the efficacy of MRI+MRCP and DCUS in determination of the nature of low biliary obstruction.Results:
The coincidence rates of US, CEUS, and DCUS in the classification of hilar cholangiocarcinoma and X-ray cholangiography were 75.6% (34/45), 82.2% (37/45), and 93.3% (42/45), respectively. The coincidence rates of US, CEUS, and DCUS in the determination of the nature of low biliary obstruction and surgical pathology were 56.5% (39/69), 82.6% (57/69), and 85.5% (59/69), respectively. Compared with conventional ultrasound, CEUS had no statistically significant difference in the diagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (P=0.438), and DCUS had statistically significant difference in the diagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (P=0.039).ROC curve analysis suggested that the cut-off value of MRI+MRCP grade and DCUS grade for diagnosing benign and malignant low biliary obstruction were both 2.5; the area under the curve (AUC) were 0.897 and 0.906, respectively (both P<0.01); sensitivity were 77.5% and 93.1%, respectively; and the specificity were 87.5% and 82.8%, respectively.Conclusion:
The value of DCUS in the classification of hilar cholangiocarcinoma and the qualitative diagnosis of low biliary tract obstruction was comparable to that of X-ray cholangiography and MRCP. DCUS had important clinical application value in the classification of hilar cholangiocarcinoma and the etiological diagnosis of low obstructive jaundice.
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Asunto principal:
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares
/
Colestasis
/
Tumor de Klatskin
Tipo de estudio:
Diagnostic_studies
/
Etiology_studies
/
Observational_studies
/
Prognostic_studies
/
Qualitative_research
Límite:
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Idioma:
Zh
Revista:
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi
Año:
2021
Tipo del documento:
Article
País de afiliación:
China