Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Urgent Breast-Related Consults Seen by Acute Care Surgery at a Safety Net Hospital.
Sargent, Rachel E; Schellenberg, Morgan; Owattanapanich, Natthida; Chen, Allen; Chen, Eric; Sener, Stephen F; Inaba, Kenji.
Afiliación
  • Sargent RE; Division of Acute Care Surgery, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Schellenberg M; Division of Surgical Oncology, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Owattanapanich N; Division of Acute Care Surgery, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Chen A; Division of Acute Care Surgery, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Chen E; Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Sener SF; Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Inaba K; Division of Surgical Oncology, LAC+USC Medical Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Am Surg ; 89(5): 1574-1579, 2023 May.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34978482
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Classically, urgent breast consults are seen by Breast Surgery or Surgical Oncology (BS/SO). At our safety net hospital, Acute Care Surgery (ACS) performs all urgent surgical consultations, including initial assessment of breast consults with coordinated BS/SO follow-up. The objective was to determine safety of ACS initial assessment of acute breast pathology.

METHODS:

All urgent breast-related consultations were included (2016-2019). Demographics, consult indications, and investigations/interventions were captured. Outcomes were compared between patients assessed by ACS versus both ACS and BS/SO at presentation.

RESULTS:

234 patients met study criteria, with median age 39 years. Patients were primarily Hispanic (82%) women (96%). Most were not seen by BS/SO at presentation (69%), although BS/SO assessment was more frequent among patients ultimately diagnosed with cancer (8% vs 1%, P = .012). No patient had delay >90 days to core biopsy from presentation. Outcomes including time to cancer diagnosis (14 vs 8 days, P = .143) and outpatient BS/SO assessment (16 vs 13 days, P = .528); loss to follow-up (25% vs 21%, P = .414); and ED recidivism (24% vs 18%, P = .274) were comparable between patients seen by ACS versus ACS/BS/SO at index presentation.

CONCLUSION:

Urgent breast consults at our safety net hospital typically underwent initial assessment by ACS with outpatient evaluation by BS/SO. Time to follow-up and cancer diagnosis, loss to follow-up, and ED recidivism were similar after index presentation assessment by ACS versus ACS and BS/SO. In a resource-limited environment, urgent breast consults can be safely managed in the acute setting by ACS with coordinated outpatient BS/SO follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Derivación y Consulta / Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Am Surg Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Derivación y Consulta / Proveedores de Redes de Seguridad Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Am Surg Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos