Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Initial Safety and Feasibility of Steerable Ureteroscopic Renal Evacuation: A Novel Approach for the Treatment of Urolithiasis.
Sur, Roger L; Agrawal, Shashank; Eisner, Brian H; Haleblian, George E; Ganpule, Arvind P; Sabnis, Ravindra B; Desai, Mahesh R; Preminger, Glenn M.
Afiliación
  • Sur RL; Department of Urology, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, California, USA.
  • Agrawal S; Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India.
  • Eisner BH; Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Newton Wellesley Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Haleblian GE; Department of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Ganpule AP; Division of Laparoscopy and Robotic Surgery, Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India.
  • Sabnis RB; Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India.
  • Desai MR; Department of Urology, Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital, Nadiad, India.
  • Preminger GM; Division of Urologic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
J Endourol ; 36(9): 1161-1167, 2022 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35331002
ABSTRACT

Background:

There is a need to reliably render urolithiasis patients completely stone free with minimal morbidity. We report on the initial safety and feasibility with steerable ureteroscopic renal evacuation (SURE) in a prospective study using basket extraction as a comparison. Materials and

Methods:

A pilot randomized controlled study was conducted comparing SURE with basket extraction postlaser lithotripsy. SURE is performed using the CVAC™ Aspiration System, a steerable catheter (with introducer). The safety and feasibility of steering CVAC throughout the collecting system under fluoroscopy and aspirating stone fragments as it was designed to do were evaluated. Fluoroscopy time, change in hemoglobin, adverse events through 30 days, total and proportion of stone volume removed at 1 day, intraoperative stone removal rate, and stone-free rate (SFR) at 30 days through CT were compared.

Results:

Seventeen patients were treated (n = 9 SURE, n = 8 Basket). Baseline demographics and stone parameters were not significantly different between groups. One adverse event occurred in each group (self-limiting ileus for SURE and urinary tract infection for Basket). No mucosal injury and no contrast extravasation were observed in either group. The CVAC catheter was steered throughout the collecting system and aspirated fragments. There was no significant difference in fluoroscopy time, procedure time, change in hemoglobin, or stone removal rate between groups. SURE removed more and a greater proportion of stone volume at day 1 vs baskets (202 mm3 vs 91 mm3, p < 0.01 and 84% vs 56%, p = 0.022). SURE achieved 100% SFR at 30 days vs 75% for baskets, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.20).

Conclusions:

This initial study suggests SURE is safe, feasible, and may be more effective in stone removal postlaser lithotripsy compared to basketing. More development is needed, and larger clinical studies are underway.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Cálculos Ureterales / Urolitiasis Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Endourol Asunto de la revista: UROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Cálculos Ureterales / Urolitiasis Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Endourol Asunto de la revista: UROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos