Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Circulating Immune Cell and Outcome Analysis from the Phase II Study of PD-L1 Blockade with Durvalumab for Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Glioblastoma.
Nayak, Lakshmi; Standifer, Nathan; Dietrich, Jorg; Clarke, Jennifer L; Dunn, Gavin P; Lim, Michael; Cloughesy, Timothy; Gan, Hui K; Flagg, Elizabeth; George, Elizabeth; Gaffey, Sarah; Hayden, Julia; Holcroft, Christina; Wen, Patrick Y; Macri, Mary; Park, Andrew J; Ricciardi, Toni; Ryan, Aileen; Schwarzenberger, Paul; Venhaus, Ralph; Reyes, Melissa de Los; Durham, Nicholas M; Creasy, Todd; Huang, Raymond Y; Kaley, Thomas; Reardon, David A.
Afiliación
  • Nayak L; Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Standifer N; Integrated Bioanalysis, Clinical Pharmacology and Safety Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, South San Francisco, California.
  • Dietrich J; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Clarke JL; Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Dunn GP; Department of Neurosurgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
  • Lim M; Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Cloughesy T; Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Gan HK; Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Flagg E; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • George E; Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
  • Gaffey S; Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Hayden J; Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Holcroft C; PROMETRIKA, LLC, New York, New York.
  • Wen PY; Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Macri M; Ludwig Cancer Research, New York, New York.
  • Park AJ; Ludwig Cancer Research, New York, New York.
  • Ricciardi T; Ludwig Cancer Research, New York, New York.
  • Ryan A; Ludwig Cancer Research, New York, New York.
  • Schwarzenberger P; Ludwig Cancer Research, New York, New York.
  • Venhaus R; Ludwig Cancer Research, New York, New York.
  • Reyes ML; Translational Medicine Oncology, Early and Early Oncology, R&D, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
  • Durham NM; Translational Medicine Oncology, Early and Early Oncology, R&D, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
  • Creasy T; Translational Medicine Oncology, Early and Early Oncology, R&D, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
  • Huang RY; Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Kaley T; Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
  • Reardon DA; Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Clin Cancer Res ; 28(12): 2567-2578, 2022 06 13.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35395080
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

PD-L1 is upregulated in glioblastoma and supports immunosuppression. We evaluated PD-L1 blockade with durvalumab among glioblastoma cohorts and investigated potential biomarkers. PATIENTS AND

METHODS:

MGMT unmethylated newly diagnosed patients received radiotherapy plus durvalumab (cohort A; n = 40). Bevacizumab-naïve, recurrent patients received durvalumab alone (cohort B; n = 31) or in combination with standard bevacizumab (cohort B2; n = 33) or low-dose bevacizumab (cohort B3; n = 33). Bevacizumab-refractory patients received durvalumab plus bevacizumab (cohort C; n = 22). Primary endpoints were OS-12 (A), PFS-6 (B, B2, B3), and OS-6 (C). Exploratory biomarkers included a systematic, quantitative, and phenotypic evaluation of circulating immune cells; tumor mutational burden (TMB); and tumor immune activation signature (IAS).

RESULTS:

No cohort achieved the primary efficacy endpoint. Outcome was comparable among recurrent, bevacizumab-naïve cohorts. No unexpected toxicities were observed. A widespread reduction of effector immune cell subsets was noted among recurrent patients compared with newly diagnosed patients that was partially due to dexamethasone use. A trend of increased CD8+Ki67+ T cells at day 15 was noted among patients who achieved the primary endpoint and were not on dexamethasone. Neither TMB nor IAS predicted outcome.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients with recurrent glioblastoma have markedly lower baseline levels of multiple circulating immune cell subsets compared with newly diagnosed patients. An early increase in systemic Ki67+CD8+ cells may warrant further evaluation as a potential biomarker of therapeutic benefit among patients with glioblastoma undergoing checkpoint therapy. Dexamethasone decreased immune cell subsets. PD-L1 blockade and combination with standard or reduced dose bevacizumab was ineffective.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Dexametasona / Glioblastoma / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Cancer Res Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Dexametasona / Glioblastoma / Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Clin Cancer Res Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article