Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery consensus statement on laparoscopic adjustable gastric band management.
Benson-Davies, Sue; Rogers, Ann M; Huberman, Warren; Sann, Nathaniel; Gourash, William F; Flanders, Karen; Ren-Fielding, Christine.
Afiliación
  • Benson-Davies S; Department of Surgery, Sanford School of Medicine, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota.
  • Rogers AM; Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Bariatric Surgery, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
  • Huberman W; Department of Psychiatry, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York.
  • Sann N; Advanced Surgical Partners of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia.
  • Gourash WF; Department of Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive Bariatric and General Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  • Flanders K; Massachusetts General Hospital Weight Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Ren-Fielding C; New York University Langone Medical Center, Division of Bariatric Surgery and Weight Management, New York, New York. Electronic address: christine.ren-fielding@nyulangone.org.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 18(9): 1120-1133, 2022 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35981951
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Laparoscopic adjustable gastric band (LAGB) management continues to be an important part of many metabolic and bariatric surgery practices.

OBJECTIVES:

To replace the existing American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) LAGB adjustment credentialing guidelines for physician extenders with consensus statements that reflect the current state of LAGB management.

SETTING:

ASMBS Integrated Health Clinical Issues Committee.

METHODS:

A modified Delphi process using a 2-stage consensus approach was conducted on LAGB management. Thirty-four consensus statements were developed following a literature search on a wide range of LAGB topics. A 5-point Likert scale was implemented to measure consensus agreement with a Delphi panel of 39 expert participants who were invited and agreed to participate in 2 rounds of Delphi questionnaires. Consensus was set a priori at 75% agreement, defined as the proportion of participants responding with agreement (i.e., 4 or 5) or disagreement (i.e., 1 or 2) on the Likert scale.

RESULTS:

Consensus was reached on 74% (25 of 34) of the LAGB management statements. In Delphi round 1, 95% (37 of 39) of the participants responded to 34 consensus statements; 21 of the statements (62%) met the 75% criteria for consensus. Thirty-one participants (80%) responded in round 2, shifting the agreement on 4 more statements to the 75% threshold.

CONCLUSION:

The ASMBS consensus statement on LAGB management is intended to guide practice with current evidence-based knowledge and professional experience. The ASMBS is not a credentialing body and does not seek to guide credentialing with this document.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Laparoscopía / Cirugía Bariátrica Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Surg Obes Relat Dis Asunto de la revista: METABOLISMO Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Laparoscopía / Cirugía Bariátrica Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Surg Obes Relat Dis Asunto de la revista: METABOLISMO Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article