Is mesh fixation necessary in laparoendoscopic techniques for M3 inguinal defects? An experimental study.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although international guidelines recommend not fixing the mesh in almost all cases of laparoendoscopic repairs, in case of large direct hernias (M3) mesh fixation is recommended to reduce recurrence risk. Despite lack of high-quality evidence, the recommendation was upgraded to strong by expert panel. The authors conducted a research experiment to verify the hypothesis that it is possible to preserve the mesh in the operating field in large direct hernias (M3) without the need to use fixing materials. METHOD: The authors conducted an experiment with scientists from Universities of Technology in a model that reflects the conditions in the groin area. By simulating conditions of the highest possible intra-abdominal pressure, they examined the mesh behavior within the groin and its ability to dislocate under the forces generated by this pressure. The experiment involved six spatial implants and one flat macroporous mesh. RESULTS: Heavyweight spatial meshes and lightweight spatial-individualized meshes showed no tendency to dislocate or move directly to the orifice, which was considered a rapid hernia recurrence. Lightweight meshes, both spatial and flat, underwent significant migration and shifting toward the hernial orifices. CONCLUSION: Based on the results, we believe that mesh fixation is not the only alternative to preventing recurrence in complex defects. Similar effects can be achieved using a larger, more rigid, and anatomically fitted implant. The type of implant (rather than its fixation) seems to be a key factor from the point of view of mechanics and biophysics. Clinical trials confirming the results in vivo will allow to supplement or amend the guidelines for the treatment of large inguinal hernias.