Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Long-term effect of implant-abutment connection type on marginal bone loss and survival of dental implants.
Kim, Young-Min; Lee, Jong-Bin; Um, Heung-Sik; Chang, Beom-Seok; Lee, Jae-Kwan.
Afiliación
  • Kim YM; Department of Periodontology and Research Institute of Oral Sciences, Gangneung-Wonju National University College of Dentistry, Gangneung, Korea.
  • Lee JB; Department of Periodontology and Research Institute of Oral Sciences, Gangneung-Wonju National University College of Dentistry, Gangneung, Korea.
  • Um HS; Department of Periodontology and Research Institute of Oral Sciences, Gangneung-Wonju National University College of Dentistry, Gangneung, Korea.
  • Chang BS; Department of Periodontology and Research Institute of Oral Sciences, Gangneung-Wonju National University College of Dentistry, Gangneung, Korea.
  • Lee JK; Department of Periodontology and Research Institute of Oral Sciences, Gangneung-Wonju National University College of Dentistry, Gangneung, Korea. periojk@gwnu.ac.kr.
J Periodontal Implant Sci ; 52(6): 496-508, 2022 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36468468
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

This study aimed to compare the long-term survival rate and peri-implant marginal bone loss between different types of dental implant-abutment connections.

METHODS:

Implants with external or internal abutment connections, which were fitted at Gangneung-Wonju National University Dental Hospital from November 2011 to December 2015 and followed up for >5 years, were retrospectively investigated. Cumulative survival rates were evaluated for >5 years, and peri-implant marginal bone loss was evaluated at 1- and 5-year follow-up examinations after functional loading.

RESULTS:

The 8-year cumulative survival rates were 93.3% and 90.7% in the external and internal connection types, respectively (P=0.353). The mean values of marginal bone loss were 1.23 mm (external) and 0.72 mm (internal) (P<0.001) after 1 year of loading, and 1.20 mm and 1.00 mm for external and internal abutment connections, respectively (P=0.137) after 5 years. Implant length (longer, P=0.018), smoking status (heavy, P=0.001), and prosthetic type (bridge, P=0.004) were associated with significantly greater marginal bone loss, and the use of screw-cement-retained prosthesis was significantly associated (P=0.027) with less marginal bone loss.

CONCLUSIONS:

There was no significant difference in the cumulative survival rate between implants with external and internal abutment connections. After 1 year of loading, marginal bone loss was greater around the implants with an external abutment connection. However, no significant difference between the external and internal connection groups was found after 5 years. Both types of abutment connections are viable treatment options for the reconstruction of partially edentulous ridges.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Idioma: En Revista: J Periodontal Implant Sci Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Idioma: En Revista: J Periodontal Implant Sci Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article