Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The Effect of Blood Flow Restriction Therapy on Shoulder Function Following Shoulder Stabilization Surgery: A Case Series.
McGinniss, John H; Mason, John S; Morris, Jamie B; Pitt, Will; Miller, Erin M; Crowell, Michael S.
Afiliación
  • McGinniss JH; Baylor University - Keller Army Community Hospital Division I Sports Physical Therapy Fellowship.
  • Mason JS; Baylor University - Keller Army Community Hospital Division I Sports Physical Therapy Fellowship.
  • Morris JB; Baylor University - Keller Army Community Hospital Division I Sports Physical Therapy Fellowship.
  • Pitt W; Baylor University - Keller Army Community Hospital Division I Sports Physical Therapy Fellowship.
  • Miller EM; Baylor University - Keller Army Community Hospital Division I Sports Physical Therapy Fellowship.
  • Crowell MS; Baylor University - Keller Army Community Hospital Division I Sports Physical Therapy Fellowship.
Int J Sports Phys Ther ; 17(6): 1144-1155, 2022.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36873568
ABSTRACT

Background:

Traumatic shoulder instability is a common injury in athletes and military personnel. Surgical stabilization reduces recurrence, but athletes often return to sport before recovering upper extremity rotational strength and sport-specific abilities. Blood flow restriction (BFR) may stimulate muscle growth without the need for heavy resistance training post-surgically. Hypothesis/

Purpose:

To observe changes in shoulder strength, self-reported function, upper extremity performance, and range of motion (ROM) in military cadets recovering from shoulder stabilization surgery who completed a standard rehabilitation program with six weeks of BFR training. Study

Design:

Prospective case series.

Methods:

Military cadets who underwent shoulder stabilization surgery completed six weeks of upper extremity BFR training, beginning post-op week six. Primary outcomes were shoulder isometric strength and patient-reported function assessed at 6-weeks, 12-weeks, and 6-months postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included shoulder ROM assessed at each timepoint and the Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (CKCUEST), the Upper Extremity Y-Balance Test (UQYBT), and the Unilateral Seated Shotput Test (USPT) assessed at the six-month follow-up.

Results:

Twenty cadets performed an average 10.9 BFR training sessions over six weeks. Statistically significant and clinically meaningful increases in surgical extremity external rotation strength (p < 0.001; mean difference, .049; 95% CI .021, .077), abduction strength (p < 0.001; mean difference, .079; 95% CI .050, .108), and internal rotation strength (p < 0.001; mean difference, .060; CI .028, .093) occurred from six to 12 weeks postoperatively. Statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements were reported on the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (p < 0.001; mean difference, 17.7; CI 9.4, 25.9) and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (p < 0.001; mean difference, -31.1; CI -44.2, -18.0) from six to 12 weeks postoperatively. Additionally, over 70 percent of participants met reference values on two to three performance tests at 6-months.

Conclusion:

While the degree of improvement attributable to the addition of BFR is unknown, the clinically meaningful improvements in shoulder strength, self-reported function, and upper extremity performance warrant further exploration of BFR during upper extremity rehabilitation. Level of Evidence 4, Case Series.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Idioma: En Revista: Int J Sports Phys Ther Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Idioma: En Revista: Int J Sports Phys Ther Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article