Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Primary rhinoplasty in patients with bilateral cleft lip: Longitudinal results and comparison between closed and semi-open approaches.
Saito, Takafumi; Tu, Junior Chun-Yu; Chou, Pang-Yun; Lo, Lun-Jou.
Afiliación
  • Saito T; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Craniofacial Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Tu JC; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Craniofacial Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Chou PY; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Craniofacial Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
  • Lo LJ; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Craniofacial Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan. Electronic address: lunjoulo@cgmh.org.tw.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 89: 117-124, 2024 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38176136
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although several studies have shown that primary rhinoplasty in patients with cleft lip provides good outcomes with limited effect on nasal growth, the surgical procedure remains to be standardized. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of primary semi-open rhinoplasty with Tajima reverse-U incision, compared with that of closed rhinoplasty.

METHODS:

Consecutive nonsyndromic patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (n = 52) who underwent primary semi-open rhinoplasty between 2001 and 2016 were reviewed. Patients who underwent primary closed rhinoplasty (n = 61) and control group individuals were recruited for comparison. Computer-based standardized measurements of 2D photographs and panel assessments by laypersons were collected and statistically analyzed.

RESULTS:

In the comparative analysis at preschool age, semi-open rhinoplasty significantly improved the typical nasal deformities, including transversely oriented wide nostrils, short columella, and de-projected nasal tip, more effectively than closed rhinoplasty. Without major drawbacks, these parameters in the semi-open group were well maintained closer to those in the control group till skeletal maturity. After primary rhinoplasty, 54% of patients in the closed group and 4% in the semi-open group underwent intermediate rhinoplasty at preschool age.

CONCLUSION:

This study showed that the patients who underwent primary semi-open rhinoplasty achieved long-term and persistent outcomes that were closer to the normal nasal morphology compared with the patients treated with closed rhinoplasty, while avoiding intermediate rhinoplasty during the preschool to adolescent periods.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Rinoplastia / Enfermedades Nasales / Labio Leporino / Fisura del Paladar Límite: Adolescent / Child, preschool / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Rinoplastia / Enfermedades Nasales / Labio Leporino / Fisura del Paladar Límite: Adolescent / Child, preschool / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Taiwán