Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative overall survival of CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapy in advanced breast cancer.
Kappel, Coralea; Elliott, Mitchell J; Kumar, Vikaash; Nadler, Michelle B; Desnoyers, Alexandra; Amir, Eitan.
Afiliación
  • Kappel C; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Elliott MJ; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Kumar V; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Nadler MB; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  • Desnoyers A; Hôpital Charles-Lemoyne, Greenfield Park, QC, Canada.
  • Amir E; Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. eitan.amir@uhn.ca.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 3129, 2024 02 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38326452
ABSTRACT
Individual trials of abemaciclib, palbociclib, and ribociclib show a similar impact on progression-free survival yet differing statistical significance for overall survival (OS). A robust comparative evaluation of OS, safety, and tolerability of the three drugs is warranted. A systematic literature search identified phase 3 randomized clinical trials reporting OS of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) in combination with endocrine therapy in ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Trial-level data on OS and common and serious adverse events (AE) were extracted for each drug. In the absence of direct comparisons, a network meta-analysis was performed to evaluate pairwise comparative efficacy, safety, and tolerability of each of the CDK4/6i. Seven studies comprising of 4415 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up was 73.3 months (range 48.7-97.2 months). There were no statistically significant differences in OS between any of the CDK4/6i. Compared to palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib both showed significantly higher GI toxicity (grade 1-2 vomiting OR 1.87 [95% CI 1.37-2.56] and OR 2.27 [95% CI 1.59-3.23] respectively). Compared to palbociclib, abemaciclib was associated with more grade 3-4 diarrhea OR 118.06 [95% CI 7.28-1915.32]. In contrast, palbociclib was associated with significantly more neutropenia than ribociclib and abemaciclib but significantly lower risk of grade 3-4 infections. Abemaciclib had significantly less grade 3-4 transaminitis and grade 3-4 neutropenia than ribociclib. Treatment discontinuation and death due to AE were significantly higher with abemaciclib than palbociclib and ribociclib. There is no statistically significant difference in OS between CDK4/6i despite differing statistical significance levels of individual trials. Real-world data analyses may help to identify if there is a meaningful inter-drug difference in efficacy. Significant differences between CDK4/6i are observed for safety and tolerability outcomes.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Sci Rep Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá