Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What Is (Un)Flavored? A Scoping Review of the Conceptualization of Flavored Cigarillos.
Pike Moore, Stephanie; Osborn, Catherine; Suratkal, Jessica; Vasu, Pranav; Koopman Gonzalez, Sarah; Trapl, Erika.
Afiliación
  • Pike Moore S; Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Osborn C; Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Suratkal J; Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Vasu P; Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Koopman Gonzalez S; Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
  • Trapl E; Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Nicotine Tob Res ; 26(9): 1120-1131, 2024 Aug 22.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38401171
INTRODUCTION: To identify how flavor is conceptualized with respect to cigarillos to illuminate areas of concordance and discordance and provide a pathway for the harmonization of tobacco flavor measurement. AIMS AND METHODS: Three methods were used to identify research measuring flavors respective to cigarillo products including: (1) querying research databases using key words "cigarillo," "tobacco" and "flavor"/'flavour,' (2) sub-sampling of the eligible literature with backward and forward reference searching, and (3) a bibliographic search of key experts. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Inclusion criteria required manuscripts to be available in English, published prior to 3/1/2022, be original and peer-reviewed, and include a measure of flavor pertaining to cigarillo products. A total of 163 manuscripts met these criteria and were subsequently evaluated. RESULTS: Cigarillo flavor determinations were made based on the presence of flavoring agents, sensory characteristics, marketing or package characteristics, pre-defined lists, the absence of any of these, and/or were undefined. Individual flavors and their related classifications were not altogether mutually exclusive due to differences in conceptualization which has evolved over time. CONCLUSIONS: Flavor measures continue to evolve, likely in response to both tobacco control policies and industry shifts. There is a lack of standardization in flavor conceptualization that can be ameliorated through intentional integration of multiple forms of research such as identifying patterns of flavoring agents and/or marketing strategies that elicit a specific flavor profile. By doing this, we may more comprehensively evaluate the impact of flavors, their constituents, and related marketing strategies on broader population health. IMPLICATIONS: There are discrepancies in the conceptualization of flavor in tobacco and nicotine products. The lack of standardized, definitive language limits our ability to comprehensively evaluate the population-level health impact of flavors in addition to our ability to effectively inform, implement, and enforce policies restricting flavors in tobacco and nicotine products.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Productos de Tabaco / Aromatizantes Tipo de estudio: Literature_review / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Nicotine tob res Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Productos de Tabaco / Aromatizantes Tipo de estudio: Literature_review / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Nicotine tob res Asunto de la revista: SAUDE PUBLICA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos