Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes and Adverse Events in Patients with Cancer after Diagnosis of Immunotherapy-Associated Diabetes Mellitus: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Duvalyan, Eva; Brondfield, Sam; Rushakoff, Robert J; Anderson, Mark S; Quandt, Zoe.
Afiliación
  • Duvalyan E; School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
  • Brondfield S; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
  • Rushakoff RJ; Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
  • Anderson MS; Diabetes Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
  • Quandt Z; Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Cancers (Basel) ; 16(9)2024 Apr 25.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38730614
ABSTRACT
Immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-induced diabetes mellitus (CPI-DM) is a rare immune-related adverse event (irAE). Patients and providers fear that continuing CPIs puts patients at risk for additional irAEs and thus may discontinue therapy. Currently, there are little data to inform this decision. Therefore, this study aims to elucidate whether discontinuing CPIs after diagnosis of CPI-DM impacts the development of future irAEs and cancer outcomes such as progression and death. Patients who developed CPI-DM during cancer treatment at UCSF from 1 July 2015 to 5 July 2023 were analyzed for cancer outcomes and irAE development. Fisher's exact tests, Student t-tests, Kaplan-Meier methods, and Cox regression were used as appropriate. Of the 43 patients with CPI-DM, 20 (47%) resumed CPIs within 90 days of the irAE, 4 (9%) patients restarted after 90 days, and 19 (44%) patients never restarted. Subsequent irAEs were diagnosed in 9 of 24 (38%) who resumed CPIs and 3 of 19 (16%) who discontinued CPIs (p = 0.17). There was no significant difference in death (p = 0.74) or cancer progression (p = 0.55) between these two groups. While our single-institution study did not show worse cancer outcomes after discontinuing CPIs, many variables can impact outcomes, which our study was not adequately powered to evaluate. A nuanced approach is needed to decide whether to continue CPI treatment after a severe irAE like CPI-DM.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Idioma: En Revista: Cancers (Basel) Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos