Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Proposed diagnostic and prognostic markers of primary malignant hepatic vascular neoplasms.
Yoo, Youngeun; Shin, Jinho; Jun, Eunsung; Koh, Eun-Young; Shin, Hwa Jeong; Kang, Hyo Jeong.
Afiliación
  • Yoo Y; Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
  • Shin J; Department of Medicine, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Jun E; Department of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul, Seoul, Republic of Korea. eunsungjun@amc.seoul.kr.
  • Koh EY; Department of Convergence Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, University of Ulsan College of Medicine Seoul, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Shin HJ; Department of Research Support Team, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kang HJ; Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea. d100478hjk@gmail.com.
Diagn Pathol ; 19(1): 68, 2024 May 13.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741104
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Primary malignant hepatic vascular tumors with various malignant potentials include epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (EHE) and angiosarcoma (AS), which may overlap pathologically. This study aimed to compare the pathological findings of hepatic EHE with those of AS, in association with patient outcomes.

METHODS:

Fifty-nine histologically confirmed patients with 34 EHE and 25 AS were admitted to a tertiary hospital from 2003 to 2020. Their EHE and AS pathological features were compared. Immunohistochemistry for CD31, ERG, CAMTA-1, TFE3, P53, and Ki-67 labeling was performed on paraffin-embedded blocks. Markers, along with histological findings, were analyzed for the purposes of diagnostic and prognostic significance by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS:

CAMTA-1 was 91.2% positive in EHE, but negative in AS (p = < 0.001). AS was significantly correlated to an aberrant p53 expression, high Ki-67 labeling, and high mitotic activity, compared to EHE (all, p = < 0.001). EHE can be classified as low grade (LG) and high grade (HG) using the prognostic values of mitotic activity and ki-67 labeling (sensitivity = 1, specificity = 1). Low grade-EHE showed significantly better overall survival than high grade-EHE (p = 0.020).

CONCLUSIONS:

Immunohistochemistry for CAMTA-1, P53, and Ki-67 labeling may help distinguish EHE and AS in histologically ambiguous cases, especially small biopsied tissue. Moreover, the combination of mitotic activity and Ki-67 labeling can be a prognostic factor for EHE with various clinical features.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Biomarcadores de Tumor / Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide / Hemangiosarcoma / Neoplasias Hepáticas Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Diagn Pathol Asunto de la revista: PATOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Biomarcadores de Tumor / Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide / Hemangiosarcoma / Neoplasias Hepáticas Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Diagn Pathol Asunto de la revista: PATOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article