Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Caregiver burden and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer in the Nurses' Health Studies.
Barnard, Mollie E; Poole, Elizabeth M; Huang, Tianyi; Sood, Anil K; Kubzansky, Laura D; Tworoger, Shelley S.
Afiliación
  • Barnard ME; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Poole EM; Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Huang T; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Sood AK; Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
  • Kubzansky LD; Departments of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
  • Tworoger SS; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Am J Epidemiol ; 2024 Jul 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38973733
ABSTRACT
Psychosocial stress may increase ovarian cancer risk and accelerate disease progression. We examined the association between caregiver burden, a common stressor, and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer. We prospectively followed 67,724 women in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS; 1992-2012) and 70,720 women in the NHSII (2001-2009) who answered questions on informal caregiving (i.e., caregiving outside of work). Women who reported no informal caregiving were considered non-caregivers while, among women who provided care outside of work, caregiver burden was categorized by time spent caregiving and perceived stress from caregiving. For the 34% of women who provided informal care for ≥15 hours per week, 42% described caregiving as moderately to extremely stressful. Pooled multivariate analyses indicated no difference in ovarian cancer risk for women providing ≥15 hours of care per week compared to non-caregivers (hazard ratio (HR)=0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-1.18), and no association was evident for women who reported moderate or extreme stress from caregiving compared to non-caregivers (HR=0.96; 95% CI 0.75-1.22). Together with prior work evaluating job strain and ovarian cancer risk, our findings suggest that, when evaluating a stressor's role in cancer risk, it is critical to consider how the stressor contributes to the overall experience of distress.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Idioma: En Revista: Am J Epidemiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Idioma: En Revista: Am J Epidemiol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos