Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The American College of Radiology contrast-enhanced ultrasound Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System and its modified version in diagnosing hepatocellular carcinoma via Sonazoid: a meta-analysis.
Cao, Jiazhi; Wang, Hong; Ruan, Xiaomiao; Yang, Jingwen; Ren, Youxiang; Ling, Wenwu.
Afiliación
  • Cao J; Department of Medical Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Wang H; Department of Medical Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Ruan X; Department of Medical Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Yang J; Department of Medical Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Ren Y; Department of Medical Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
  • Ling W; Department of Medical Ultrasound, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Quant Imaging Med Surg ; 14(7): 4555-4566, 2024 Jul 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39022290
ABSTRACT

Background:

The American College of Radiology (ACR) developed the contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) for pure blood contrast agents, but Sonazoid was not included. Modifications to LI-RADS have been proposed for Sonazoid. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to identify and compare the diagnostic efficacy of the two LI-RADS algorithms of Sonazoid.

Methods:

We searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases from databases inception to August 31, 2023, to find original studies on the ACR LI-RADS and/or modified LI-RADS algorithm with Sonazoid used as the contrast agent in patients with high-risk hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A bivariate random-effects model was used. Data pooling, meta-regression, and sensitivity analysis were performed for meta-analysis. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the methodological quality, and the Deeks funnel plot asymmetry test was used to evaluate the publication bias.

Results:

A meta-analysis of 10 studies with 1,611 observations was conducted. The pooled data for ACR LI-RADS category 5 (LR-5) and modified LR-5 were respectively as follows pooled sensitivity, 0.70 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64-0.75] and 0.81 (95% CI 0.76-0.86) (P<0.05); pooled specificity, 0.90 (95% CI 0.82-0.94) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.81-0.91) (P>0.05); and pooled area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.84 and 0.91. The diagnostic performance of LI-RADS category M (LR-M) of the two algorithms was comparable. Study heterogeneity was observed.

Conclusions:

The results indicated that modified LR-5 algorithm demonstrated improved diagnostic sensitivity compared with the ACR LR-5 algorithm of Sonazoid, with differences observed between the different versions. Further research is needed to validate and explore the optimal diagnostic criteria for HCC using Sonazoid. Before the database search was conducted, this study was registered on PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews; CRD42023455220).
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Idioma: En Revista: Quant Imaging Med Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Idioma: En Revista: Quant Imaging Med Surg Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China