Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Imaging for breast pain: A useful paradigm to promote breast cancer screening and reduce unnecessary breast imaging.
Capiro, Nina; Sayre, James; Fischer, Cheryce; Sadigh, Gelareh.
Afiliación
  • Capiro N; Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America. Electronic address: ncapiro@mednet.ucla.edu.
  • Sayre J; Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
  • Fischer C; Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
  • Sadigh G; Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA, United States of America.
Clin Imaging ; 114: 110253, 2024 Oct.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39146826
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Identify the proportion of patients presenting for diagnostic breast imaging with clinically insignificant breast pain who are eligible for screening mammography and analyze the impact of routing these patients to screening on resource utilization, healthcare spending and cancer detection.

METHODS:

We retrospectively reviewed 100 consecutive women ≥40 years old without a history of breast cancer who underwent diagnostic mammogram and breast ultrasound for clinically insignificant breast pain from 1/2022 to 4/2022. Patients were screen-eligible if their last bilateral mammogram was over 12 months prior to presentation. Patients with only screening views during diagnostic mammography were assumed to have a negative/benign screening mammogram. Costs were calculated using the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Physician Fee Schedule.

RESULTS:

68 of 100 patients with breast pain were screen-eligible at time of diagnostic imaging. With a screen first approach, 47/68 would have had negative/benign screening mammograms, allowing for the availability of 47 diagnostic breast imaging appointments. The current workflow led to 100 diagnostic mammograms and ultrasounds, 29 follow-up ultrasounds, and 10 image-guided biopsies, with a total cost of $42,872.41. With a screen first approach, there would have been 68 screening mammograms, 53 diagnostic mammograms and ultrasounds, 10 follow-up ultrasounds, and 9 image-guided biopsies, with a total cost of $34,231.60. Two cancers were identified, both associated with suspicious mammographic findings. None would have been missed in a screen-first approach.

DISCUSSION:

Identifying screen-eligible patients with clinically insignificant breast pain and routing them to screening mammogram improves radiology resource allocation and decreases healthcare spending without missing any cancers.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Mamografía / Ultrasonografía Mamaria / Detección Precoz del Cáncer Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Imaging / Clin. imaging / Clinical imaging Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama / Mamografía / Ultrasonografía Mamaria / Detección Precoz del Cáncer Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Imaging / Clin. imaging / Clinical imaging Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article