Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized, double-masked parallel-group, multicenter clinical study evaluating the efficacy and safety of the biosimilar candidate AVT06 compared to the reference product aflibercept in participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Agostini, Hansjürgen; Baumane, Kristine; Balciuniene, Vilma Jurate; Ozols, Kaspars; Soni, Riken; Hamdi, Sabrina; Cirillo, Silvia; Rai, Masna; Otto, Hendrik; Leutz, Steffen; Sattar, Abid; Berti, Fausto.
Afiliación
  • Agostini H; Eye Center, University Medical Center Freiburg, Germany.
  • Baumane K; Riga East University Hospital Clinic Bikernieki, Ophthalmology Clinic, Riga, Latvia.
  • Balciuniene VJ; Hospital of Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kauno Klinikos, Kaunas, Lithuania.
  • Ozols K; North Kurzeme Regional Hospital, Latvia.
  • Soni R; Alvotech Swiss AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Hamdi S; Alvotech Swiss AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Cirillo S; Alvotech Swiss AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Rai M; Alvotech Swiss AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Otto H; Alvotech Swiss AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Leutz S; Alvotech Swiss AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Sattar A; Alvotech Swiss AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Berti F; Alvotech Swiss AG, Zurich, Switzerland.
Expert Opin Biol Ther ; 25(7): 773-787, 2025 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-40512025
BACKGROUND: This study compared efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity, and safety between AVT06, proposed biosimilar to reference product (RP) aflibercept (Eylea®), in participants with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). METHODS: In this randomized, double-masked, multicenter, active-controlled trial, treatment naïve participants received intravitreal injections of AVT06 or RP (2 mg) over 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to Week 8 in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). Secondary endpoints included BCVA improvements and changes in Central Subfield Thickness (CST). PK, immunogenicity, and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: The 90% and 95% confidence intervals (-0.60, 2.14 and -0.86, 2.40, respectively) in least squares mean difference in BCVA letter score from baseline to Week 8 were contained within the pre-specified equivalence margin of ETDRS BCVA letter score of [-3.5 to 3.5], supporting the demonstration of comparative efficacy. Secondary efficacy outcomes were also comparable. PK analyses supported systemic safety. There were no clinically meaningful differences in immunogenicity profiles. Safety profiles were similar; most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild and unrelated to the study drug. CONCLUSIONS: Results supported a demonstration of comparable efficacy between AVT06 and RP aflibercept. Similar PK, immunogenicity, and safety profiles were also shown. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier is NCT05155293; ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu identifier is 2021-003651-42.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión / Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis / Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular / Biosimilares Farmacéuticos / Degeneración Macular Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Expert opin biol ther Asunto de la revista: BIOLOGIA / TERAPEUTICA Año: 2025 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Asunto principal: Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusión / Inhibidores de la Angiogénesis / Receptores de Factores de Crecimiento Endotelial Vascular / Biosimilares Farmacéuticos / Degeneración Macular Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Expert opin biol ther Asunto de la revista: BIOLOGIA / TERAPEUTICA Año: 2025 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Alemania