Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis for percutaneous nephrolithotomy and risk of infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Talizin, Thalita Bento; Danilovic, Alexandre; Torricelli, Fabio Cesar Miranda; Marchini, Giovanni S.; Batagello, Carlos; Vicentini, Fabio C.; Nahas, William Carlos; Mazzucchi, Eduardo.
Afiliação
  • Talizin, Thalita Bento; Universidade de São Paulo. Hospital das Clínicas. São Paulo. BR
  • Danilovic, Alexandre; Universidade de São Paulo. Hospital das Clínicas. São Paulo. BR
  • Torricelli, Fabio Cesar Miranda; Universidade de São Paul. Faculdade de Medicina. Disciplina de Urologia. São Paulo. BR
  • Marchini, Giovanni S.; Universidade de São Paul. Faculdade de Medicina. Disciplina de Urologia. São Paulo. BR
  • Batagello, Carlos; Universidade de São Paulo. Hospital das Clínicas. São Paulo. BR
  • Vicentini, Fabio C.; Universidade de São Paul. Faculdade de Medicina. Disciplina de Urologia. São Paulo. BR
  • Nahas, William Carlos; Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo. Divisão de Urologia. São Paulo. BR
  • Mazzucchi, Eduardo; Universidade de São Paul. Faculdade de Medicina. Disciplina de Urologia. São Paulo. BR
Int. braz. j. urol ; 50(2): 152-163, Mar.-Apr. 2024. tab, graf
Article em En | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1558066
Biblioteca responsável: BR1.1
ABSTRACT
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

The aim of this study is to perform a high-quality meta-analysis using only randomized controlled trials (RCT) to better define the role of postoperative antibiotics in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Materials and

Methods:

A literature search for RCTs in EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science up to May 2023 was conducted following the PICO framework Populationadult patients who underwent PCNL; Intervention—postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis until nephrostomy tube withdrawal; Control—single dose of antibiotic during the induction of anesthesia; and Outcome—systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) or sepsis and fever after PCNL. The protocol was registered on the PROSPERO database (CRD42022361579). We calculated odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A random-effects model was employed, and the alpha risk was defined as < 0.05.

Results:

Seven articles, encompassing a total of 629 patients, were included in the analysis. The outcome of SIRS or sepsis was extracted from six of the included studies, while the outcome of postoperative fever was extracted from four studies. The analysis revealed no statistical association between the use of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis until nephrostomy tube withdrawal and the occurrence of SIRS/sepsis (OR 1.236, 95% CI 0.731 - 2.089, p=0.429) or fever (OR 2.049, 95% CI 0.790 - 5.316, p=0.140).

Conclusion:

Our findings suggest that there is no benefit associated with the use of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis until nephrostomy tube withdrawal in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We recommend that antibiotic prophylaxis should be administered only until the induction of anesthesia in PCNL.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: LILACS Idioma: En Revista: Int. braz. j. urol Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: LILACS Idioma: En Revista: Int. braz. j. urol Assunto da revista: UROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil