Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An overview of adverse events reported by participants in CDC's anthrax vaccine and antimicrobial availability program.
Martin, Stacey W; Tierney, Bruce C; Aranas, Aaron; Rosenstein, Nancy E; Franzke, Laura H; Apicella, Louis; Marano, Nina; McNeil, Michael M.
Afiliação
  • Martin SW; Anthrax Vaccine Safety Team, Epidemiology and Surveillance Division, National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA. ZMT0@CDC.GOV
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 14(6): 393-401, 2005 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15717323
PURPOSE: The CDC's Anthrax Vaccine and Antibiotic Availability Program was implemented under an Investigational New Drug (IND) application to provide additional post-exposure prophylaxis for individuals potentially exposed to Bacillus anthracis in the fall of 2001. Participants were provided with two options: (1) 40 additional days of antimicrobial prophylaxis (i.e., ciprofloxacin, doxycycline, or amoxicillin); or (2) 40 additional days of antimicrobial prophylaxis plus three doses of anthrax vaccine adsorbed (AVA). METHODS: Participants were monitored for adverse events (AEs). Participants were asked to complete 2-week AE diaries for 6 weeks post-enrollment, and approximately 2 months after enrollment, active surveillance was conducted through telephone interviews with 1113 (64%) participants. RESULTS: A total of 1727 of approximately 10 000 previously prophylaxed persons enrolled to receive 40 additional days of antibiotics. Of these, 199 opted at enrollment to receive three doses of AVA in addition to the additional 40 days of antibiotic. Overall, 28% of participants reported at least one AE on their diaries. Results varied by surveillance mechanism, the diary data indicated differences in the proportion reporting AEs between participants receiving antibiotic only and participants receiving antibiotic and AVA. However, during the active 2-month telephone follow-up, the rates of AEs reported for both the antibiotic only and antibiotic plus AVA treatment regimens were similar. Additionally, ciprofloxacin and doxycycline had similar AE profiles, with only rigors reported significantly more often among ciprofloxacin recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the rates of AEs experienced by all participants were acceptable given the seriousness of potential B. anthracis exposure.
Assuntos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bacillus anthracis / Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos / Vacinas contra Antraz / Experimentação Humana / Antraz / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Assunto da revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / TERAPIA POR MEDICAMENTOS Ano de publicação: 2005 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos
Buscar no Google
Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Bacillus anthracis / Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos / Vacinas contra Antraz / Experimentação Humana / Antraz / Antibacterianos Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Assunto da revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / TERAPIA POR MEDICAMENTOS Ano de publicação: 2005 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos