Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Spot-scanning beam proton therapy vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy for ipsilateral head and neck malignancies: a treatment planning comparison.
Kandula, Shravan; Zhu, Xiaorong; Garden, Adam S; Gillin, Michael; Rosenthal, David I; Ang, Kie-Kian; Mohan, Radhe; Amin, Mayankkumar V; Garcia, John A; Wu, Richard; Sahoo, Narayan; Frank, Steven J.
Afiliação
  • Kandula S; Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Med Dosim ; 38(4): 390-4, 2013.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23916884
ABSTRACT
Radiation therapy for head and neck malignancies can have side effects that impede quality of life. Theoretically, proton therapy can reduce treatment-related morbidity by minimizing the dose to critical normal tissues. We evaluated the feasibility of spot-scanning proton therapy for head and neck malignancies and compared dosimetry between those plans and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans. Plans from 5 patients who had undergone IMRT for primary tumors of the head and neck were used for planning proton therapy. Both sets of plans were prepared using computed tomography (CT) scans with the goals of achieving 100% of the prescribed dose to the clinical target volume (CTV) and 95% to the planning TV (PTV) while maximizing conformity to the PTV. Dose-volume histograms were generated and compared, as were conformity indexes (CIs) to the PTVs and mean doses to the organs at risk (OARs). Both modalities in all cases achieved 100% of the dose to the CTV and 95% to the PTV. Mean PTV CIs were comparable (0.371 IMRT, 0.374 protons, p = 0.953). Mean doses were significantly lower in the proton plans to the contralateral submandibular (638.7 cGy IMRT, 4.3 cGy protons, p = 0.002) and parotid (533.3 cGy IMRT, 48.5 cGy protons, p = 0.003) glands; oral cavity (1760.4 cGy IMRT, 458.9 cGy protons, p = 0.003); spinal cord (2112.4 cGy IMRT, 249.2 cGy protons, p = 0.002); and brainstem (1553.52 cGy IMRT, 166.2 cGy protons, p = 0.005). Proton plans also produced lower maximum doses to the spinal cord (3692.1 cGy IMRT, 2014.8 cGy protons, p = 0.034) and brainstem (3412.1 cGy IMRT, 1387.6 cGy protons, p = 0.005). Normal tissue V10, V30, and V50 values were also significantly lower in the proton plans. We conclude that spot-scanning proton therapy can significantly reduce the integral dose to head and neck critical structures. Prospective studies are underway to determine if this reduced dose translates to improved quality of life.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Prevencao_e_fatores_de_risco / Agentes_cancerigenos / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos / Tratamento / Radioterapia Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada / Terapia com Prótons / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Med Dosim Assunto da revista: RADIOTERAPIA Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Prevencao_e_fatores_de_risco / Agentes_cancerigenos / Tipos_de_cancer / Outros_tipos / Tratamento / Radioterapia Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada / Terapia com Prótons / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Med Dosim Assunto da revista: RADIOTERAPIA Ano de publicação: 2013 Tipo de documento: Article