Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide versus sitagliptin after 52 weeks in type 2 diabetes in a randomized controlled trial (AWARD-5).
Nauck, Michael; Weinstock, Ruth S; Umpierrez, Guillermo E; Guerci, Bruno; Skrivanek, Zachary; Milicevic, Zvonko.
Afiliação
  • Nauck M; Diabeteszentrum Bad Lauterberg, Bad Lauterberg, Germany.
  • Weinstock RS; Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY.
  • Umpierrez GE; Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
  • Guerci B; Diabetology, Nutrition, and Metabolic Disorders, University of Lorraine, Brabois Hospital, Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, FranceCenter of Clinical Investigation ILCV, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nancy, Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France.
  • Skrivanek Z; Lilly Diabetes, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Milicevic Z; Lilly Diabetes, Eli Lilly and Company, Vienna, Austria milicevic_zvonko@lilly.com.
Diabetes Care ; 37(8): 2149-58, 2014 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24742660
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To compare the efficacy and safety of two doses of once-weekly dulaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, to sitagliptin in uncontrolled, metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. The primary objective was to compare (for noninferiority and then superiority) dulaglutide 1.5 mg versus sitagliptin in change from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at 52 weeks. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

METHODS:

This multicenter, adaptive, double-blind, parallel-arm study randomized patients (N = 1,098; mean baseline age 54 years; HbA1c 8.1% [65 mmol/mol]; weight 86.4 kg; diabetes duration 7 years) to dulaglutide 1.5 mg, dulaglutide 0.75 mg, sitagliptin 100 mg, or placebo (placebo-controlled period up to 26 weeks). The treatment period lasted 104 weeks, with 52-week primary end point data presented.

RESULTS:

The mean HbA1c changes to 52 weeks were (least squares mean ± SE) -1.10 ± 0.06% (-12.0 ± 0.7 mmol/mol), -0.87 ± 0.06% (9.5 ± 0.7 mmol/mol), and -0.39 ± 0.06% (4.3 ± 0.7 mmol/mol) for dulaglutide 1.5 mg, dulaglutide 0.75 mg, and sitagliptin, respectively. Both dulaglutide doses were superior to sitagliptin (P < 0.001, both comparisons). No events of severe hypoglycemia were reported. Mean weight changes to 52 weeks were greater with dulaglutide 1.5 mg (-3.03 ± 0.22 kg) and dulaglutide 0.75 mg (-2.60 ± 0.23 kg) compared with sitagliptin (-1.53 ± 0.22 kg) (P < 0.001, both comparisons). The most common gastrointestinal treatment-emergent adverse events in dulaglutide 1.5- and 0.75-mg arms were nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting.

CONCLUSIONS:

Both dulaglutide doses demonstrated superior glycemic control versus sitagliptin at 52 weeks with an acceptable tolerability and safety profile.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pirazinas / Triazóis / Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão / Fragmentos Fc das Imunoglobulinas / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Peptídeos Semelhantes ao Glucagon / Hipoglicemiantes / Metformina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Care Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pirazinas / Triazóis / Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão / Fragmentos Fc das Imunoglobulinas / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Peptídeos Semelhantes ao Glucagon / Hipoglicemiantes / Metformina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Care Ano de publicação: 2014 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha