Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review and meta-analysis of somatic and germline DNA sequence biomarkers of esophageal cancer survival, therapy response and stage.
Findlay, J M; Middleton, M R; Tomlinson, I.
Afiliação
  • Findlay JM; Molecular and Population Genetics, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford; Oxford OesophagoGastric Centre.
  • Middleton MR; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK.
  • Tomlinson I; Molecular and Population Genetics, Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford; NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: jfindlay@well.ox.ac.uk.
Ann Oncol ; 26(4): 624-644, 2015 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25214541
INTRODUCTION: There is an urgent need for biomarkers to help predict prognosis and guide management of esophageal cancer. This review identifies, evaluates and meta-analyses the evidence for reported somatic and germline DNA sequence biomarkers of outcome and stage. METHODS: A systematic review was carried out of the PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases (20 August 2014), in conjunction with the ASCO Level of Evidence scale for biomarker research. Meta-analyses were carried out for all reported markers associated with outcome measures by more than one study. RESULTS: Four thousand and four articles were identified, 762 retrieved and 182 studies included. There were 65 reported markers of survival or recurrence 12 (18.5%) were excluded due to multiple comparisons. Following meta-analysis, significant associations were seen for six tumor variants (mutant TP53 and PIK3CA, copy number gain of ERBB2/HER2, CCND1 and FGF3, and chromosomal instability/ploidy) and seven germline polymorphisms: ERCC1 rs3212986, ERCC2 rs1799793, TP53 rs1042522, MDM2 rs2279744, TYMS rs34743033, ABCB1 rs1045642 and MTHFR rs1801133. Twelve germline markers of treatment complications were reported; 10 were excluded. Two tumor and 15 germline markers (11 excluded) of chemo (radio)therapy response were reported. Following meta-analysis, associations were demonstrated for mutant TP53, ERCC1 rs11615 and XRCC1 rs25487. There were 41 tumor/germline reported markers of stage; 27 (65.9%) were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Numerous DNA markers of outcome and stage have been reported, yet few are backed by high-quality evidence. Despite this, a small number of variants appear reliable. These merit evaluation in prospective trials, within the context of high-throughput sequencing and gene expression.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Esofago Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: DNA de Neoplasias / Neoplasias Esofágicas / Biomarcadores Tumorais / Mutação em Linhagem Germinativa / Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Esofago Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: DNA de Neoplasias / Neoplasias Esofágicas / Biomarcadores Tumorais / Mutação em Linhagem Germinativa / Polimorfismo de Nucleotídeo Único Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article