Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Repeat left atrial catheter ablation: cardiac magnetic resonance prediction of endocardial voltage and gaps in ablation lesion sets.
Harrison, James L; Sohns, Christian; Linton, Nick W; Karim, Rashed; Williams, Steven E; Rhode, Kawal S; Gill, Jaswinder; Cooklin, Michael; Rinaldi, C Aldo; Wright, Matthew; Schaeffter, Tobias; Razavi, Reza S; O'Neill, Mark D.
Afiliação
  • Harrison JL; From the Division of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London (J.L.H., C.S., N.W.L., R.K., S.E.W., K.S.R., J.G., C.A.R., M.W., T.S., R.S.R., M.D.O.), Department of Cardiology (J.L.H., N.W.L., S.E.W., J.G., M.C., C.A.R., M.W, M.D.O.), Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation T
  • Sohns C; From the Division of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London (J.L.H., C.S., N.W.L., R.K., S.E.W., K.S.R., J.G., C.A.R., M.W., T.S., R.S.R., M.D.O.), Department of Cardiology (J.L.H., N.W.L., S.E.W., J.G., M.C., C.A.R., M.W, M.D.O.), Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation T
  • Linton NW; From the Division of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London (J.L.H., C.S., N.W.L., R.K., S.E.W., K.S.R., J.G., C.A.R., M.W., T.S., R.S.R., M.D.O.), Department of Cardiology (J.L.H., N.W.L., S.E.W., J.G., M.C., C.A.R., M.W, M.D.O.), Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation T
  • Karim R; From the Division of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London (J.L.H., C.S., N.W.L., R.K., S.E.W., K.S.R., J.G., C.A.R., M.W., T.S., R.S.R., M.D.O.), Department of Cardiology (J.L.H., N.W.L., S.E.W., J.G., M.C., C.A.R., M.W, M.D.O.), Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation T
  • Williams SE; From the Division of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London (J.L.H., C.S., N.W.L., R.K., S.E.W., K.S.R., J.G., C.A.R., M.W., T.S., R.S.R., M.D.O.), Department of Cardiology (J.L.H., N.W.L., S.E.W., J.G., M.C., C.A.R., M.W, M.D.O.), Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation T
  • Rhode KS; From the Division of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London (J.L.H., C.S., N.W.L., R.K., S.E.W., K.S.R., J.G., C.A.R., M.W., T.S., R.S.R., M.D.O.), Department of Cardiology (J.L.H., N.W.L., S.E.W., J.G., M.C., C.A.R., M.W, M.D.O.), Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation T
  • Gill J; From the Division of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London (J.L.H., C.S., N.W.L., R.K., S.E.W., K.S.R., J.G., C.A.R., M.W., T.S., R.S.R., M.D.O.), Department of Cardiology (J.L.H., N.W.L., S.E.W., J.G., M.C., C.A.R., M.W, M.D.O.), Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation T
  • Cooklin M; From the Division of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London (J.L.H., C.S., N.W.L., R.K., S.E.W., K.S.R., J.G., C.A.R., M.W., T.S., R.S.R., M.D.O.), Department of Cardiology (J.L.H., N.W.L., S.E.W., J.G., M.C., C.A.R., M.W, M.D.O.), Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation T
  • Rinaldi CA; From the Division of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London (J.L.H., C.S., N.W.L., R.K., S.E.W., K.S.R., J.G., C.A.R., M.W., T.S., R.S.R., M.D.O.), Department of Cardiology (J.L.H., N.W.L., S.E.W., J.G., M.C., C.A.R., M.W, M.D.O.), Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation T
  • Wright M; From the Division of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London (J.L.H., C.S., N.W.L., R.K., S.E.W., K.S.R., J.G., C.A.R., M.W., T.S., R.S.R., M.D.O.), Department of Cardiology (J.L.H., N.W.L., S.E.W., J.G., M.C., C.A.R., M.W, M.D.O.), Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation T
  • Schaeffter T; From the Division of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London (J.L.H., C.S., N.W.L., R.K., S.E.W., K.S.R., J.G., C.A.R., M.W., T.S., R.S.R., M.D.O.), Department of Cardiology (J.L.H., N.W.L., S.E.W., J.G., M.C., C.A.R., M.W, M.D.O.), Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation T
  • Razavi RS; From the Division of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London (J.L.H., C.S., N.W.L., R.K., S.E.W., K.S.R., J.G., C.A.R., M.W., T.S., R.S.R., M.D.O.), Department of Cardiology (J.L.H., N.W.L., S.E.W., J.G., M.C., C.A.R., M.W, M.D.O.), Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation T
  • O'Neill MD; From the Division of Imaging Sciences & Biomedical Engineering, King's College London (J.L.H., C.S., N.W.L., R.K., S.E.W., K.S.R., J.G., C.A.R., M.W., T.S., R.S.R., M.D.O.), Department of Cardiology (J.L.H., N.W.L., S.E.W., J.G., M.C., C.A.R., M.W, M.D.O.), Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation T
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol ; 8(2): 270-8, 2015 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25593109
BACKGROUND: Studies have reported an inverse relationship between late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) signal intensity and left atrial (LA) endocardial voltage after LA ablation. However, there is controversy regarding the reproducibility of atrial LGE CMR and its ability to identify gaps in ablation lesions. Using systematic and objective techniques, this study examines the correlation between atrial CMR and endocardial voltage. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty patients who had previous ablation for atrial fibrillation and represented with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation or atrial tachycardia underwent preablation LGE CMR. During the ablation procedure, high-density point-by-point Carto voltage maps were acquired. Three-dimensional CMR reconstructions were registered with the Carto anatomies to allow comparison of voltage and LGE signal intensity. Signal intensities around the left and right pulmonary vein antra and along the LA roof and mitral lines on the CMR-segmented LA shells were extracted to examine differences between electrically isolated and reconnected lesions. There were a total of 6767 data points across the 20 patients. Only 119 (1.8%) of the points were ≤ 0.05 mV. There was only a weak inverse correlation between either unipolar (r = -0.18) or bipolar (r = -0.17) voltage and LGE CMR signal intensities with low voltage occurring across a large range of signal intensities. Signal intensities were not statistically different for electrically isolated and reconnected lesions. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that there is only a weak point-by-point relationship between LGE CMR and endocardial voltage in patients undergoing repeat LA ablation. Using an objective method of assessing gaps in ablation lesions, LGE CMR is unable to reliably predict sites of electrical conduction.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial / Taquicardia Supraventricular / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Ablação por Cateter / Endocárdio / Átrios do Coração / Sistema de Condução Cardíaco Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial / Taquicardia Supraventricular / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Ablação por Cateter / Endocárdio / Átrios do Coração / Sistema de Condução Cardíaco Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Assunto da revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article