Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Combination therapy improves prostate cancer survival for patients with potentially lethal prostate cancer: The impact of Gleason pattern 5.
Liss, Adam L; Abu-Isa, Eyad I; Jawad, Maha S; Feng, Felix Y; Vance, Sean M; Winfield, Raymond J; Narayana, Vrinda; Sandler, Howard M; McLaughlin, P William; Hamstra, Daniel A.
Afiliação
  • Liss AL; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Abu-Isa EI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Providence Hospital, Novi, MI.
  • Jawad MS; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Feng FY; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Vance SM; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
  • Winfield RJ; Department of Urology, Providence Hospital, Novi, MI.
  • Narayana V; Department of Radiation Oncology, Providence Hospital, Novi, MI.
  • Sandler HM; Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
  • McLaughlin PW; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Providence Hospital, Novi, MI.
  • Hamstra DA; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. Electronic address: dhamm@umich.edu.
Brachytherapy ; 14(4): 502-10, 2015.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25911994
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To investigate the impact of Gleason pattern 5 (GP5) prostate cancer after either external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or the combination of EBRT with low-dose rate brachytherapy boost (combo). METHODS AND MATERIALS Between 1998 and 2008, 467 patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk prostate cancer were treated with EBRT (n = 326) or combo (low-dose rate to 90-108 Gy using I-125 followed by EBRT) (n = 141). Freedom from biochemical failure, freedom from metastasis (FFM), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival were evaluated.

RESULTS:

Combo patients were younger (66 vs. 72 years, p < 0.001) and had fewer comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity index 3.7 vs. 4.4, p < 0.001). EBRT patients had higher tumor stages (T3-4 30% vs. 21%, p = 0.03) and lower Gleason scores (8-10 61% vs. 75%, p = 0.01). Androgen deprivation therapy use was similar between cohorts (85% vs. 87%, p = 0.5), but EBRT patients had longer androgen deprivation therapy use (median 14 vs. 12 months, p = 0.05). GP5 predicted worse FFM (p < 0.001, hazard ratio [HR] 3.3, 95% confidence interval [CI]1.8-6.2]) and CSS (p < 0.001, HR 5.9, 95% CI 2.7-12.9) for the EBRT group, but not for the combo group (p = 0.86, HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.1-2.4 for metastasis and p = 0.5, HR 1.6, 95% CI 0.33-8.0 for CSS). In those with GP5 (n = 143), combo was associated with improved outcomes in all endpoints. On univariate analysis, 5-year outcomes for combo vs. EBRT were as follows freedom from biochemical failure 89% vs. 65%, FFM 89% vs. 67%, CSS 93% vs. 78%, and overall survival 88% vs. 67% (p < 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSION:

Combo was associated with improved outcomes for men with GP5 prostate cancer. This highlights the importance of local therapy, especially in patients with the highest pathologic grade disease.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Prostata / Tratamento / Radioterapia Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Braquiterapia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Brachytherapy Assunto da revista: RADIOTERAPIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Coleções: 01-internacional Temas: Geral / Tipos_de_cancer / Prostata / Tratamento / Radioterapia Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Braquiterapia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Brachytherapy Assunto da revista: RADIOTERAPIA Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article